
In an act of both
optimism and defiance, 60 gay and straight couples took
public commitment vows Sunday at the Unitarian Universalist
Church in Arlington, Va., The
Washington Post reported Monday.
Singing protest songs and walking in procession,
the couples gathered before a banner that read
“Marriage is a civil right.” Unitarian
reverend Richard Nugent presided over the crowd,
loudly voicing his support for universal marriage
rights. “Whether you are married in the eyes of the
law or only in the eyes of your family, this ceremony is for
you,” he said, according to the newspaper.
The ceremony coincides with the same-sex
marriage debate exploding in both Virginia and
neighboring Maryland. Virginia legislators are
currently considering a constitutional amendment defining
marriage as strictly the union of a man and a
woman. While there is currently a ban on any
recognition of same-sex unions in Virginia, Republican
legislators are pushing for a constitutional change so those
laws can’t be altered by judicial decisions.
Voters could be asked to decide on the matter in
November, the Post reported.
“To put it bluntly,” Nugent told
the crowd, “this amendment is mean-spirited,
arises out of political expediency, and fuels ungrounded
fear and bigotry.
On the other side of the spectrum, a Maryland
circuit court judge last week decided that the ban
on same-sex marriage was discriminatory. The case
will now head to an appeals court, and if the first
judge’s decision is upheld, same-sex marriage
could be legalized in the state.
Rhonda Buckner, who committed to her partner,
Diane Ullius, in the ceremony, said she is optimistic
that her home state of Virginia will one day follow
Maryland's lead. “There is no way the world can turn
back now,” she told the newspaper. “They
can make it miserable in the meantime, but they
can’t change progress.” (Advocate.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.