

After a six-year battle to strengthen Utah's hate-crimes law, Rep. David Litvack got what he's been after: the overwhelming support of the house. House Bill 90, which underwent an overnight overhaul, passed the house on a 64–5 vote Thursday in Salt Lake City. It now moves to the senate, where little opposition is expected.
But the overhaul
stripped the bill of any mention of sexual orientation,
something opponents of the measure had been lobbying for.
Historically, the house objections centered on a list
of characteristics for which hate-crime victims
are typically targeted. Included in those was sexual
orientation; the Republican-led house argued that its
mention would create "special rights" for gay people.
Others argued that the bill might violate the First
Amendment, supposedly "punishing a person for their thoughts."
The new version of the bill removes the list of
traits and adds language that states the intent
of the bill is not to curb free speech. "That's all
we've ever asked for," said Gayle Ruzicka, president
of the conservative group Utah Eagle Forum, which has
fought the bill for at least six years. "It's the
right bill, it took out the groups and has the
aggravating factors," she said. "But it protects the
individual. Under this bill, I would be protected just as
much as if I were a member of a group."
This is only the second time hate-crimes legislation has passed the house. In 2003 a different version of the bill passed on a 38–35 vote after a lengthy, late-night debate. But it was recalled the next morning and then pulled from consideration by Litvack and a cosponsor after an attempt to gut it. No reconsideration is expected this time, said Litvack, a Democrat from Salt Lake City: "I think we're safe." (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.