
The Boston archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church announced Friday it would turn its back on children who need homes rather than continue to consider gay parents as equal to straights, as Massachusetts state law demands. Once its current contract with the state expires, the church's Catholic Charities will stop providing adoption services in explicit protest of the state's refusal to allow it to discriminate against gay and lesbian potential parents, The Boston Globe reported.
Catholic Charities has provided hundreds of children with new homes during its approximately 20 years of work with the state, including a number of children placed with gay or lesbian parents.
The state's Catholic bishops, who oversee the charity, had asked for an exemption to the antidiscrimination law that demands the group treat all potential parents equally. Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, a Republican widely thought to have presidential aspirations, sided with the bishops but could not himself provide the exemption, which would have required legislative approval.
The church's crusade against equality for gays and lesbians and the state's insistence on equal treatment created "a dilemma we cannot resolve," the president and the chairman of Catholic Charities' board of trustees said in a statement. The group therefore elected to resolve the dilemma at the expense of homeless children. Despite that decision, the statement insisted, "At all times we sought to place the welfare of children at the heart of our work."
"Today's decision by Boston's Catholic Charities to cease their adoption assistance program that once secured safe, caring, and loving homes for hundreds of children is a tragedy for the children they served," countered Jennifer Chrisler, executive director of Family Pride, an advocacy group for LGBT-led families. "Rather than expanding the opportunities for children in need by allowing adoption by gay and lesbian couples whom credible research in the last 25 years has proved fully capable of raising well-adjusted children, they have opted instead to deny any children access to their long-standing tradition of excellent work in this field." (Advocate.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.