
Mission America, a Columbus, Ohio–based conservative group with strong ties to the antigay group Concerned Women of America, has filed a large Freedom of Information Act request for tens of thousands of documents about the state’s AIDS service organizations, reports Gay People’s Chronicle. Gay activists say the request was made to both intimidate organizations conducting HIV prevention work in the gay community as well as to put political pressure on lawmakers to stop funding AIDS programs targeting gay men.
Concerned Women of America, which teaches that “finding homosexuality repulsive is a natural human instinct,” opposes any publicly funded programs that in any way condone or support homosexuality, including HIV prevention instruction, reports the Chronicle.
“The millions of dollars spend on pointless education about condoms and safe sex don’t seem to change the behaviors of most homosexuals,” Mission America founder Linda Harvey says on the organization’s Web site. Her organization’s “Choice 4 Truth” program claims that gay organizations began exploiting the AIDS crisis in the 1980s—and continue to exploit it today—as a way to gain local, state, and federal funding to “promote the homosexual cause.”
Harvey is seeking state health department records from 2000 to 2005 about funding to AIDS service organizations, copies of all HIV prevention materials released by AIDS organizations, lobbying materials, and funding information about lobbying efforts on behalf of AIDS groups as well as state data on AIDS deaths by mode of transmission, numbers of new infections, and modes of transmission for new infections.
Earl Pike, executive director of the AIDS Taskforce of Greater Cleveland, suspects that a larger antigay conservative group, possibly Concerned Women of America, may be behind Harvey’s crusade against HIV prevention work in Ohio. “Your FOI request…evidences an advanced knowledge of HIV/AIDS that I can find nowhere else in the writings on your Web site,” Pike wrote in a letter to Harvey that accompanied more than 1,500 pages of documents about the organization, according to the Chronicle. “It is reasonable to suppose that you had some assistance in drafting this request. My question, then, is this: Who might you or Mission America have worked with to prepare and submit the request?”
Pike said in a March 22 press conference that he submitted the documents to Harvey to show his agency’s support of open access to public information and to highlight the transparency of his and other AIDS organizations in the state. He also said that no matter what the paperwork may show, he expects Harvey and Mission America will find any HIV prevention program that teaches anything other than abstinence to be questionable. The right-wing group will work to end public funding of such programs as condom instruction and distribution as well as those that conduct outreach to gay men in bathhouses and sex clubs, he says. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.