

Remember how some
Democrats blamed LGBT people's push for
marriage equality for the 2004 election results?
Perhaps gays are now owed an apology.
The effort to defeat
Virginia's proposed constitutional amendment to ban
same-sex marriage apparently pulled thousands
of progressive voters out to the polls,
sending Democrat James Webb to the U.S. Senate by
the thinnest of margins and handing the upper
chamber to the Democrats for the next two years. A
10-to-1 spending edge by gays and their allies
depressed the final majority in favor of the
amendment to 57%, a far cry from the 75% support
that has typified amendment election results in the past.
A glance at the six
most populous left-of-center counties and
urban areas tells the story. Roughly 588,000
people voted on the marriage amendment in these
regions, with nearly 60%, or about 350,000,
people voting no. The other two relatively
uncontroversial ballot measures passed handily. But
they passed without the participation of
roughly 25,000 voters who weighed in on the marriage
amendment but took no stand on the other questions
one way or another.
Did those voters also
vote for James Webb? It appears they did. Webb
won the six regions 64%–36%, taking 377,000
out of 593,000 Senate votes cast in these locations.
Statewide, Webb beat
incumbent George Allen 1,175,606 to 1,166,277,
a difference of fewer than 10,000 votes.
(Ann Rostow, The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.