CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
The state of Texas may not recognize marriages for same-sex couples, but that didn't stop a judge in southeast Texas from granting a gay couple's divorce earlier this week. Judge Tom Mulvaney of the 279th district court signed a divorce decree on Monday for Beaumont residents Russell Smith, 26, and John Anthony, 34. Smith and Anthony were granted a license of civil union in Vermont in February 2002. Mulvaney said the case was a first for him, and others in the legal profession said they think it is the only such divorce outside Vermont. Smith, who petitioned for the divorce, said getting the divorce in Texas was expensive and strenuous. But getting the union dissolved in Vermont would have required Smith or Anthony to live in that state for at least a year before a final divorce hearing, the The [Beaumont] Enterprise reported. Smith said he had to get a legal divorce for financial reasons. The couple did not file joint income tax returns, but they did have joint auto and life insurance. The two also ran several businesses together, and the division of their assets and properties was done by agreement. Smith's lawyer, Ronnie Cohee, said that because the Vermont union was legally binding, it needed to be legally dissolved. She said her legal justification relied on the U.S. Constitution's "full faith and credit clause," which requires states to recognize marriages and other contracts from other states. Cohee also said that even though Texas law refers to a husband and wife when talking about marriage, state law refers to "parties" when addressing dissolution. Richard Carlson, a law professor at South Texas College of Law in Houston, said that because the divorce was sought by agreement, appeals in the case are unlikely. But if an appeal were to be made to a higher court, Carlson said, he would expect that court to simply not recognize the marriage as binding.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Upstate New York Methodist minister comes out as transgender to congregation during Sunday service
December 03 2025 9:24 AM
Transgender Army vet running for state delegate in red Maryland district is all about showing up
December 03 2025 7:00 AM
7 times Pete Hegseth was the definition of toxic masculinity
December 02 2025 5:46 PM
Man pleads guilty to murder of gay University of Mississippi student Jimmie 'Jay' Lee
December 02 2025 2:32 PM
Florida man partially paralyzed after neighbor allegedly shot him and used anti-LGBTQ+ slurs
December 02 2025 1:30 PM
Queer comedian Cameron Esposito has first baby with wife Katy Nishimoto
December 02 2025 12:49 PM
Trans National Guard employee in Illinois sues Trump over restroom ban
December 02 2025 11:59 AM
Oklahoma University instructor suspended for failing student’s unscientific anti-trans psychology essay
December 02 2025 11:03 AM
Here are all of Trump's political enemies that have been charged or investigated (so far)
December 02 2025 9:52 AM



































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes