The Pennsylvania
state senate voted in favor of a proposed constitutional
amendment that would ban same-sex marriage Wednesday,
although in a blow to conservatives, it defeated an
additional proposal to ban civil unions. Earlier this
month, the Pennsylvania house approved both the marriage and
civil-unions bans, but in order to send any bill to voters
in 2007 as supporters hope to do, the two chambers
will have to unify their measures by August
7--and a two-month legislative recess begins next
week, the Associated Press reports.
The delay effectively means the earliest a
marriage or civil-unions ban could be put before
voters in a statewide referendum is 2008, since
Pennsylvania law requires any constitutional amendment to be
approved by the house and senate in Harrisburg in two
consecutive legislative sessions. A 1996 state law
already defines marriage as a union between a man and
a woman, but conservatives think an amendment to the
constitution is necessary to prevent courts from deciding otherwise.
But progressives, predictably, disagree. "If
we're concerned about the sanctity of marriage, I
don't know how it hurts your marriage...if
some gay couple in Philadelphia is living together," Senator
Vincent J. Fumo, D-Philadelphia, said according to the
AP. "Mind your own business, stay out of the bedroom."
Added Senator Jim Ferlo, D-Allegheny: "This
measure is disheartening, it is divisive, and it is
diversionary to say the least. The Pennsylvania
Constitution should not be tarnished with this measure."
(The Advocate)
Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes