In
the murder trial of three men charged in the death of
Michael J. Sandy, a 29-year-old gay man believed to
have been targeted by his killers via a gay chat room,
New York State supreme court justice Jill
Konviser-Levine has questioned whether hate was a
motivation, reports The New York Times. The state
Hate Crimes Act of 2000 provides lengthier prison
sentences for murders committed "in whole or in
substantial part because of a belief or
perception regarding the race, color, national origin,
ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age,
disability, or sexual orientation of a person."
"Bottom line, is
animus an element of the crime?" Konviser-Levine
wondered aloud, according to the Times.
Prosecutors and
defense lawyers have debated the motivations of John Fox,
20; Ilya Shurov, 21; and Anthony Fortunato, 21, who are
accused of leading Sandy to a parking garage in
New York City's Sheepshead Bay section last
October, beating him, and then chasing him into the
street, where he was hit by a car whose driver then fled the
scene. He died later in the hospital.
Defense lawyer
Gerald J. Di Chirara asked Konviser-Levine to dismiss
allegations of a hate crime because he said "the crimes
alleged are not crimes of hate but rather crimes of
opportunity." (The Advocate)
Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes