In the murder trial of three men charged in the death of Michael J. Sandy, a 29-year-old gay man believed to have been targeted by his killers via a gay chat room, New York State supreme court justice Jill Konviser-Levine has questioned whether hate was a motivation, reports The New York Times. The state Hate Crimes Act of 2000 provides lengthier prison sentences for murders committed "in whole or in substantial part because of a belief or perception regarding the race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability, or sexual orientation of a person."
"Bottom line, is animus an element of the crime?" Konviser-Levine wondered aloud, according to the Times.
Prosecutors and defense lawyers have debated the motivations of John Fox, 20; Ilya Shurov, 21; and Anthony Fortunato, 21, who are accused of leading Sandy to a parking garage in New York City's Sheepshead Bay section last October, beating him, and then chasing him into the street, where he was hit by a car whose driver then fled the scene. He died later in the hospital.
Defense lawyer Gerald J. Di Chirara asked Konviser-Levine to dismiss allegations of a hate crime because he said "the crimes alleged are not crimes of hate but rather crimes of opportunity." (The Advocate)















Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes
These are some of his worst comments about LGBTQ+ people made by Charlie Kirk.