Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Iowa House Republicans pass a bill that will make the lives of transgender residents worse

Conservative lawmakers are attempting to take away protections that some local governments have put in place to prevent discrimination against their LGBTQ+ citizens.

The golden dome of the Iowa State Capitol is visible through wire slats on a suspension bridge over a river. In front of the capitol sit a church and apartment building.

The Iowa House of Representatives has passed a bill prohibiting local governments from including gender identity in non-discrimination ordinances.

Alex Potemkin/iStock via Getty Images

The Iowa House of Delegates passed a bill Thursday that would disallow local governments from including gender identity in their non-discrimination policies.

Keep up with the latest in LGBTQ+ news and politics. Sign up for The Advocate's email newsletter.


Protections for trans residents had already been struck from the Iowa Civil Rights Act in 2025. The new bill would prohibit counties or municipalities from adopting non-discrimination policies that are “broader” or “different” from those protected under state law.

Rep. Amie Wichtendahl, a Democrat representing the Cedar Rapids area, was sworn in as Iowa’s first out trans state legislator last year. Wichtendahl said the bill makes LGBTQ+ residents feel less safe in Iowa, pushing them toward “friendlier homes in neighboring states,” the Des Moines Register reports.

Related: Iowa passes bill stripping civil rights protections for transgender people, send to governor

Related: Iowa Considers 'License to Discriminate' Bill, Plus Restroom Restrictions

“It diminishes our ability to attract new workers,” Wichrendahl said. “This bill before us today makes a mockery of our state’s most sacred values.”

Similar efforts have surfaced in other Republican-led states. In Idaho, for example, GOP lawmakers have advanced legislation that would block cities and counties from enforcing LGBTQ-inclusive nondiscrimination ordinances that go beyond state law, effectively wiping out protections in more than a dozen municipalities that currently prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Advocates there warn the move would erase local civil rights safeguards covering roughly a third of the state’s population.

The Iowa bill originally focused on referring local civil rights complaints to the state’s Office of Civil Rights. But removing local protections around gender identity had been proposed by Gov. Kim Reynolds, a Republican, and folded into the bill by Republican state lawmakers. The amended bill passed 60-26, with 14 members absent or not voting.

“We’re not going to have everybody, and their mom decides they're going to have this civil rights code,” said Rep. Skyler Wheeler, a Republican representing the Hull area, according to the Des Moines Register. “It's unworkable for businesses, and it's just a crazy idea.”

Related: Iowa now allows anti-transgender discrimination

Related: Iowa Republicans Seek to End Marriage Equality in State

For years, blue pockets in Republican-majority states have adopted local ordinances to protect LGBTQ+ residents from discrimination that would be harder to achieve on a state level.

As of this month, 14 cities and one unincorporated community of Iowa had passed non-discrimination policies including protections for gender identity, according to the Iowa Capitol Dispatch. The state legislature’s efforts to restrict trans rights have been a point of concern for many LGBTQ+ Iowans and their allies, who staged large-scale protests last year at the statehouse.

Before becoming law, the bill must first pass the Iowa Senate and then be sent to the governor’s desk for final approval. State lawmakers like Wichtendahl warn that its passage would only further ostracize trans Iowans.

“Stand up for justice, stand up for freedom, and stand up for the rights of your citizens,” Wichtendahl said. “This state is long overdue for a check on its constitutional abuses and the reckless disregard for the rights and freedoms of its citizens.”

This article was written as part of the Future of Queer Media fellowship program at The Advocate, which is underwritten by a generous gift from Morrison Media Group. The program helps support the next generation of LGBTQ+ journalists.

FROM OUR SPONSORS

More For You