
CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
The Dubuque Telegraph Herald has urged Iowans to vote no on whether to convene a new constitutional convention, which could facilitate an amendment rescinding marriage equality in the state.
"Were voters to approve a convention, gay marriage opponents figure, they might push through an amendment restricting marriage to one man and one woman and put it before voters," editorial staff wrote in a Sunday opinion piece. "It would be one thing if that were the only issue. But a 'yes' vote, which would throw open Iowa's entire constitution, is a perilous prospect."
Regardless of one's opinion on gay marriage in the state, the paper continued, constitutional conventions risk attracting "political donnybrooks."
"Once a convention opens, anything in the constitution could be put up for amendment or elimination. That might not be in Iowans' best interests," the editorial board wrote.
Read the full opinion piece here.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
BREAKING: Supreme Court to decide whether states can ban transgender women & girls from sports
July 03 2025 10:02 AM
True
Who was Jimmy Swaggart, the late, anti-LGBTQ+, disgraced televangelist?
July 02 2025 5:40 PM
The deadly 'big beautiful' budget bill will turn America into a morgue
July 02 2025 11:28 AM