|| Television ||
1 2 3 4 NEXT  Page 1 of 4

Modern Family's Moon Man

From bumping butts with a TV legend to being showered with equal praise by the stroller set and the bear community, Modern Family star Eric Stonestreet is thrilled to be pushing the gay movement forward.


ERIC STONESTREET MAIN X390 (JEFF NICHOLSON) | ADVOCATE.COM

Colin Firth may feel bad about taking gay roles away from gay actors, but Modern Family star Eric Stonestreet doesn’t share that guilt. On ABC’s Golden Globe-nominated mockumentary comedy series, which has been picked up for a second season, Stonestreet proudly plays Cameron, the more flamboyant half of a gay couple raising an adopted baby, opposite out actor Jesse Tyler Ferguson as Mitchell. Also known as Dr. Benson in the 2003 indie Girls Will Be Girls, the 38-year-old Kansas native spoke to Advocate.com about how he’s personally pushing the gay movement forward — with or without prime-time PDA.

Advocate.com: First of all, thanks for introducing the term “moon landing” to popular culture. What was it like to touch bare butt cheeks with Ed O’Neill?
Eric Stonestreet: [Laughs] I tweeted the day that episode aired that if you set goals, work hard, and always believe in yourself, you too can touch butts with a TV icon someday. It was blurred out on TV, but we really did touch butts. He was like, “You fine with this?” I was like, “I’m fine with it. Are you fine with it?” And he was like, “Yeah, let’s do this!” So we touched butts, and it was great.

Twitter obviously makes you easily accessible to fans. What kind of feedback have you gotten from gay viewers about Modern Family?
The response has been overwhelmingly positive. I had prepared myself that people might think Cameron was too flamboyant, too broad, or too stereotypical, but we’ve always felt we take it to that line but then twist it a bit. Gay couples have approached me at the Grove in Los Angeles just to say “thank you.” At Starbucks I was approached by two women pushing a stroller who said, “We’d like to introduce you to our baby.” I’ve been blown away, because I was expecting a little bit more blowback, if you will, than what we’ve received from the gay community and even from people who are opposed to gay rights.

Have you gotten negative feedback from right-wingers or religious zealots who don’t believe gays should adopt?
There is that out there, but I don’t pay attention to it and neither do the writers. This is the best way I can put it: If there are any crazy conservatives who have a problem with watching two men raise a baby with love and care, they can just turn the channel to CSI, watch people get raped and murdered, and they’ll be fine.

Do you feel like you personally have the power to influence or change conservative Middle American opinions on gay issues?
Absolutely. Our main goal is to make people laugh, and we don’t want to shove anything in anyone’s face, but for sure we acknowledge and appreciate the opportunity to also educate people. The writers, Jesse, and I have all talked about it and agree that the faster we can shuffle down the fact that these guys are gay, the better. We’ve been successful at just highlighting that these guys love each other, they’re in a committed relationship, they’re neurotic, they’re excitable, and they’re nervous about raising a baby and doing the right thing. The fact that they’re gay really goes in the background, which I think is a positive step. The sooner people stop thinking of people as gay and start thinking of people as people, the better off we are.

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. 1 2 3 4 NEXT  Page 1 of 4
Reader Comments
  • Name: Julie
    Date posted: 2/23/2010 4:01:41 AM
    Hometown: NYC

    Comment:

    Some of you are way too prickly. When they say "shuffled down" all they mean is that it portrays us as more than just "gay," and that the bulk of the story is just about their regular day-to-day lives. I sure look forward to the day when my homosexuality is not my most salient feature because even though I'm proud of who I am, there's are more important aspects of myself. This show is definitely a step in the right direction. Maybe it's not perfect, but it's a process and you can't make everyone happy. If a stereotypical couple is shown, then we're "stereotyping ourselves". If a non-stereotypical couple is shown, then we're "shoving ourselves back in the closet" or "trying too hard to seem straight." There are all kinds of us out there, and we can't all be represented at once. This show doesn't do too bad a job. At the very least we get to see two very different types of people who both identify as gay, so people are less prone to making sweeping generalizations that we're all the same.

  • Name: Bobby
    Date posted: 2/15/2010 6:56:11 PM
    Hometown: Miami

    Comment:

    Frankly, this is the first show that shows REAL looking gay couples rather than the gym-clones we're used to seeing. Yes, he's fat, yes, his blond boyfriend needs to shave. SO FUCKING WHAT? This show is a lot more realistic than Queer As Folk where every issue is resolved with mindblownig sex and where the ugliest gay happened to be Ted which happened to be athletic and had a six pack. In other words, TED WASN'T UGLY! Besides, Modern Family is not a political show, if they start talking about domestic partnerships, powers of attorney, same-sex marriage and all that crap then the show becomes boring political crap. You want boring political crap? Watch MSNBC - The Place for PROGRESSIVE Politics.

  • Name: Andrew
    Date posted: 2/13/2010 1:15:14 PM
    Hometown: Sacramento, CA

    Comment:

    I REALLY wanted to be offended by this show but, from what I've seen, the gay couple isn't any crazier than any of the other couples. And I haven't detected any malice like I did when I used to watch "In Living Color" years ago. It would be funny if the gay couple encountered some intolerant idiots and "went out of their way" to mind fuck some homophobes, in an over-the-top soap opera way. Perhaps, with the help of some produce or a gerbil. LOL The joke would be at the expense of the homophobes and NOT the gay characters. There could be a gay bashing incident and one gay character physically defends the other and is then denied hospital visitation rights, if it's appropriate for whatever state this show happens in. There ARE ways to work the issues into the show without being too preachy. NOW, when will we be getting a sequel to "Girls Will Be Girls?" Or at least the "Eric Stonestreet" edition? And perhaps some of the characters from GWBG can appear on "Modern Family."

  • Name: Charles
    Date posted: 2/13/2010 8:10:56 AM
    Hometown: st louis

    Comment:

    My partner of 28 years with two grandkids 5 and 9 whom are with us 3 days a week .. love this show just the way it is. we sit there and say that is you and laugh.. that is what it is all about.. being able to laugh at your self

  • Name: Not a fan
    Date posted: 2/12/2010 10:12:53 PM
    Hometown: Penisville, IN

    Comment:

    I cannot believe the queen actually said this: "the faster we can shuffle down the fact that these guys are gay, the better." Yep, jump back in that closet after peeking out. GOD FORBID we remind people there are gay people out there. DIDN'T WILL & GRACE COVER THAT ALREADY? He might as well have been saying, "the faster we can get back in the closet and have them forget these guys are gay, the better." SHUFFLE DOWN? I think not, you stupid, fat queen. You think your "flamboyance" is shuffling things down, you clueless hypocrite? Yep - it's supposed to be funny. Effeminate men are funny. Normal gay men who act normally just aren't funny, are they, Penelope? Don't get political - but make sure you lisp your S'es and be all limp wristed and you'll have them howling in the aisles. THIS SHOW IS A STEP BACKWARD AND IS OFFENSIVE AS HELL.

  • Name: Over it before I even watched it
    Date posted: 2/12/2010 10:05:30 PM
    Hometown: Penisville, IN

    Comment:

    Yes, thank you SO much for portraying gays as mincing, effeminate, vapid girlies. Hairy or not. That's what *I* was hoping the next gay character on TV would be... JUST WHAT WE NEED TO BREAK THOSE STEREOTYPES OF US being butch and manly and normal appearing. NO - WE NEED MORE GIRLY-MEN ON TV!

  • Name: Val
    Date posted: 2/11/2010 2:29:00 PM
    Hometown: Columbus

    Comment:

    I agree with what has been said about showing affection with each other. While I don't expect a network show to press the envelope and show the couple in bed together they could be a lot more affectionate without causing the network executives too many heart attacks. My partner and I have been together for 20 years and while we have settled into somewhat of a routine we do still show lots of affection and get pretty hot for each other. In those moments when one of us is going through a rough time we can count on each other for a hug or simply holding each others hand. C'mon ABC (and/or the actors) you have created a really heartfelt gay couple on network television. Go a step further and allow them to show genuine affection. You may be surprised at the positive response you get. Give you audience some credit.

  • Name: FakeName
    Date posted: 2/11/2010 12:23:00 AM
    Hometown: Anytown

    Comment:

    However difficult it may be for a couple with a baby to find time for sex, it's not at all hard to find ways for Cameron and Mitchell to be affectionate with each other. In "Up All Night" for example when Mitchell is expressing his fear that he'll be seen as the nagging parent and not be picked to walk Lily down the aisle, how hard could it have been to have the actors hold hands for part of that or for Cameron to run his hand down Mitchell's arm? There are moments like this to be found; it sounds like it may be up to the actors to find them.

  • Name: Fan
    Date posted: 2/10/2010 11:29:31 PM
    Hometown: Minnesota

    Comment:

    As a gay male couple with a two year old let me tell you that I can't remember the last time my husband and I displayed intimacy with each other! Sadly (really sadly), it's just a fact of life. Except for the 10 minutes we pencil in once a month in our bedroom, there is nothin! If those two were all over each other I would have been like.. right, whatever!

  • Name: Mark
    Date posted: 2/10/2010 9:54:52 PM
    Hometown: Wappingers Falls

    Comment:

    The Valentine's Day episode was disappointing tonight. The two straight couples had sexy dates, and the gay couple spent their time trying to get their nephew a date with a girl. Don't they deserve more than that?



Don't Miss
  • Best of Broadway How Broadway Does a Flea Market

    Find out why actress Kathleen Chalfant calls the annual Flea Market and Grand Auction in Times Square "the most glamorous flea market you've ever seen." It raised half a million dollars to fight HIV/AIDS.

  • News Is CPAC Illegally Discriminating Against Gays?

    Fred Karger once again isn't being allowed a table at one of the GOP's biggest annual gatherings, and this time he's threatening legal action because he believes he's being discriminated against because he's gay.

  • News Obama Makes the Case for Fairness
     

    He made the case for “a return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility” — a theme pertinent for an LGBT community facing disproportionate poverty rates and legal barriers to equal rights.

  • Film Mosquita y Mari’s Path to Sundance

    Director Aurora Guerrero talks to The Advocate about the making of her new film and how she believes mainstream media simplifies the lives of LGBT and Latino characters.

  • Film Young & Wild: A Director’s Perspective

    The director and cowriter of Young & Wild, a film about a teen struggling to reconcile her raging sexual drive with an evangelical upbringing, writes about making the film and her own life growing up lesbian in Chile.

  • Arts and Entertainment Hot Sheet

    The top 10 entertainment highlights on our gaydar this week: Ross Mathews takes over, Mrs. Danvers fondles again, while Halston and Carol Channing get documented.

  • Travel Slideshow Flag Gayest Cities in America, 2012

    It's no secret that megalopolises New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles have robust LGBT life — and we've even heard tell of little queer hoods like the Castro and P-Town. This isn't that list.

 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity
 
COVER 1055 X135 | ADVOCATE.COM
Today's Headlines