|| News ||
1 2 3 NEXT  Page 1 of 3

Story Updated : July 06, 2010 08:01:00 PM

Reaction: Civil Union Veto


HAWAII VETO X390 (FLICKR/CIVILBEAT) | ADVOCATE.COM

Hawaii governor Linda Lingle has vetoed legislation that would have legalized civil unions in her state, while gay rights groups seem to be readying a lawsuit over her decision.

"After months of listening to Hawaii’s citizens express to me in writing and in person their deeply held beliefs in supporting or opposing House Bill 444, I've decided to veto" the bill, Lingle said Tuesday at a press conference in Honolulu.

The Republican governor clearly wasn't swayed by 7,500 letters, postcards, and petition signatures in favor of the legislation that were delivered to her by gay rights groups. Lingle was also presented with the results of a 2009 poll showing public support for civil unions.

The state house passed the legislation in April, after the senate approved it in January. Lingle, an opponent of marriage equality, has stated she believes civil unions will lead to same-sex marriage.

Evan Wolfson, the executive director of the group Freedom to Marry, was one of the attorneys in the historic case in which Hawaii's supreme court ruled, in 1993, that denying gay couples the right to marry was unconstitutional (after years of back-and-forth in the courts, the state would eventually amend its constitution to allow legislators to ban same-sex marriage). In a statement Wolfson said, “In the 1990s, Hawaii began the ongoing international movement toward ending gay couples' exclusion from marriage and was the first U.S. state to create a legal status to provide some state-level recognition and protections for same-sex couples.

“In the historic Baehr case, the Hawaii supreme court acknowledged a constitutional mandate to treat same-sex couples equally. Governor Lingle's decision to veto the civil union bill is deeply disappointing and unnecessarily delays Hawaii's journey toward fairness and equality. Governor Lingle has rejected the will of the state legislature and the advice of countless business and faith leaders, and turned her back on the committed couples and Hawaii kin who have expressed their support for this measure. Freedom to Marry urges the Hawaii state legislature to overrule Governor Lingle's veto and take an important step toward fairness and equal protection for same-sex couples in Hawaii.” (Continued on following page)

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. 1 2 3 NEXT  Page 1 of 3
Reader Comments
  • Name: Buster von Arnswaldt
    Date posted: 7/10/2010 12:09:21 PM
    Hometown: Kurtistown, Hawaii

    Comment:

    While I am personally disappointed at Gov. Lingle's decision to veto HB444, I don't think that a boycott of Hawaii is proper. A boycott would not only hurt the state, but create animosity towards gay rights. Gay owned businesses will also suffer. The opposition is very well organized. I think a more organized effort is needed to get supporters and our local officials to become more vocal in their support of gender-based rights (equal protection under the law). As this issue will most likely go to ballot, we must make sure that our supporters make it to the polls to voice their support. We have a lot of people that support us, but they do not vote. We must keep this issue front and center, making sure that this does not fade away. The oppostion hears about it in their churches every Sunday. We must make sure that our friends and family don't fail to go to the polls when the time comes. Talk to your friends and family about enlisting their support in the voting booths. VOTE FOR EQUALITY.

  • Name: Hugh
    Date posted: 7/8/2010 7:35:38 PM
    Hometown: Dallas

    Comment:

    Ms. Lingle, How is it you are not aware that politicians like you were the reason that women were not allowed to own land, get a divorce, hold public office, or VOTE??? Have you heard of the Suffrage Movement? As well, it was politicians like you who engaged in the incremental and systematic dehumanization of European Jews that lead to their loss of property, civil rights, ability to work, and eventually their lives. Have you heard of the Nuremberg Laws? Politicians like you stood by while female children were sold into marriage or genitally mutilated. Have you heard of Sharia Law? You are now among a long list of political cowards who were lifted on board by other women and men greater than yourself, and then pulled the ladder up behind you. You are a voter, a politician, a divorcee, and a Jew. Absent more courageous people than yourself you wouldn't be allowed the first three, and the last would have gotten you gassed and incinerated. You are a shameless and unrepentant coward.

  • Name: Mauimaleko
    Date posted: 7/8/2010 12:40:04 AM
    Hometown: Lahaina

    Comment:

    To Liam of Portland: Yes, she is twice divorced. But I don't expect that she will be seeking a civil union here in Hawaii for herself [and her "friend" in Las Vegas] anytime soon. Just wait a few years for the complete story to emerge on Ms. Lingle.

  • Name: Mauimaleko
    Date posted: 7/8/2010 12:33:15 AM
    Hometown: Lahaina

    Comment:

    I live in Hawai'i, and to all who do not, PLEASE BOYCOTT these islands. Tourism is a vital engine that drives the economy here, and a boycott will be tangible and felt. As a nationwide LGBT community, we boycotted Coors Beer and Colorado in the 1990s, and got them to do an about face. Please vote with your wallets and voice your opposition to this outrageous veto by Gov. Lingle.

  • Name: Liam
    Date posted: 7/8/2010 12:27:44 AM
    Hometown: Portland

    Comment:

    My reaction was complete outrage. The civil rights of LGBT people should never be left up to voters. Linda Lingle joined a long list of Republican bigots who are cruel and abusive to the LGBT community. This is what happens when a Republican is in power, they bash the LGBT community and they act like its something to be proud of. Shame on Linda Lingle (who by the way has been divorced twice). I guess if she can't make a marriage work she wants others to suffer.

  • Name: Bill
    Date posted: 7/7/2010 10:41:16 PM
    Hometown: Arlington

    Comment:

    @Midtown Atlanta Mark - Brilliant strategy. Everyone should call and let them know that we aren't going to Hawaii until they create a welcoming environment for all of us. Money talks, particularly in this economy.

  • Name: JW
    Date posted: 7/7/2010 10:10:19 PM
    Hometown: formerly Honolulu, now Los Angeles

    Comment:

    Hawai'i is a socially conservative, cloistered, and homophobic place. It functions like an isolated small town - corrupt old-boys-network government, stagnant leadership, resistance to change, and dislike of outsiders. Non-locals are treated with disdain, unless they're there to spend money. Then they smile until you turn your back. I grew up there. I have a prep school ring that would open many doors for me. But, I won't move home unless a parent is ill. Instead, I enjoy an out life here on the Mainland. It's not perfect, but at least progress is not a dirty word. On a positive note, the President of the Interfaith Alliance Hawai'i, was chaplain at my alma mater, and I see that he has been a very outspoken supporter of civil unions through this legislative process. I always did like you, Chaplain Heidel.

  • Name: Staci
    Date posted: 7/7/2010 8:54:56 PM
    Hometown: Pasadena, CA

    Comment:

    @Mike, we lack equal rights in our own home states (Illinois, Ohio and California). Unless you live in Iowa, DC, or New England, you don't have equal rights. And even then we don't on a federal level. Yet we flock to NYC and SF, even though we lack equal rights there. Where is that boycott? The legislature couldn't pass marriage due to a constitutional amendment so they did the next best thing. She vetoed it, but she is now termed out. Rather than boycott the state that had the courage to pass civil unions (with a Gay politician who introduced the bill), we should help Neil Abercrombie get elected as the next governor, as the legislature will repass civil unions and he has repeatedly stated he would sign the bill (unlike his two challengers). This was the act of one stupid woman, and I don't agree with boycotting when they are more progressive than most of the rest of our nation. But we can agree to disagree...

  • Name: Tyler
    Date posted: 7/7/2010 8:45:16 PM
    Hometown: San Luis Obispo

    Comment:

    She even admits that she 'personally' does not support same sex marriages or relationships, but then says it has nothing to do with her decision. She's a liar. It had everything to do with her decision. If she supported same sex marriages and she wouldn't have been able to veto it. This made it easy for her.

  • Name: mike
    Date posted: 7/7/2010 7:56:13 PM
    Hometown: chicago

    Comment:

    @ ed: If the only way to actually reach the Hawaii state legislature is through their tax payers who DO have special rights, then why shouldn't they be boycotted? Why should we spend our hard earned dollars in a state that does not recognize our rights? I fail to see your logic as anything but being a doormat.

 PREVIOUS 1 2 3 4 5 NEXT  


 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity