|| Commentary ||
1 2 3 NEXT  Page 1 of 3

Tripping Over a Leg Up

Is there such a thing as gay affirmative action? Could a well-meaning aid to the advancement of LGBTs result in more discrimination?


TRIPPING OVER A LEG UP X390 (TOMO COCOTOS) | ADVOCATE.COM

Last May, Aiden Quinn was texting his girlfriend while operating a moving vehicle—a dangerous activity under any circumstances, but especially reckless considering that Quinn wasn’t driving a mere automobile. As a trolley driver for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, which operates Boston’s subway and bus systems nicknamed the “T,” Quinn was at the helm of a train carrying dozens of people underground. Buried in his digital billets-doux, he wasn’t alert when the train sailed through a red light and rammed into the back of another trolley. Luckily, no one was killed, though nearly 50 people were injured, and the resulting lawsuits could cost the T millions.

Media attention slowly drew away from the details of the accident to something far more sensational: Quinn is female-to-male transgender. This immediately provided fodder for all manner of disparaging comments, and given the way in which transgenderism—something of which most Americans are utterly ignorant and view as peculiar—was suddenly thrust into the mainstream media spotlight, it was understandable that transgender organizations would go on the defensive. “Anything related to his gender identity would be irrelevant and further perpetuate unnecessary sensationalism,” read a statement from the Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition. “Media outlets should be reporting on the facts of the case and not using sensationalistic coverage of a person’s identity or former name when neither has a bearing on the case.”

Quinn’s trans identity had nothing to do with the collision; being transgender (or gay or female or black or left-handed) does not make one more likely to text while driving. But that doesn’t mean that his gender identity was utterly “irrelevant.” Indeed, Quinn’s transgenderism became fair game when the allegation arose that he had benefited from it to get his job in the first place. “[Quinn] was initially hired as a minority and used her [sic] transgender status,’” an MBTA source told ABC News. The MBTA rebutted that charge, saying that Quinn was hired through a job lottery, although the T does advertise itself as an “affirmative action employer.”

Consider the following: Quinn had received three speeding tickets and was involved in a motor vehicle accident during the seven years prior to the accident. Amazingly, these violations do not disqualify one from working for the T, which may say more about lax government hiring standards and the power of public employee unions in Massachusetts than it does about political correctness. But is it not fair to at least raise the question of whether Quinn would have been treated differently were he not transgender?

Regardless of the specifics surrounding this particular incident, the prospect of preferential hiring on the basis of homosexuality and transgender identity poses troubling questions. At this point it’s a largely hypothetical issue. In most states employers can fire or refuse to hire LGBTs solely because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. So the idea of asking for special preferences is more than akin to the metaphor of beggars acting like choosers. But in the country’s more “progressive” institutions, the notion of gay affirmative action is not so theoretical. At the 2006 annual meeting of the National Association for College Admission Counseling, the subject of affirmative action for gay students came up and found some adherents, including an admissions officer at Vermont’s prestigious Middlebury College. The school’s assistant director of admissions told the website Inside Higher Ed that gay students bring “a unique quality,” which is important as the school tries hard not “to be too homogeneous.” Don’t be surprised if, within the next few years, the nation’s top colleges add homosexuality to their list of applicant “attributes,” giving gay students the same leg up that athletes, children of alumni, and some racial minorities also enjoy.

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. 1 2 3 NEXT  Page 1 of 3
Reader Comments
  • Name: Nakhone the Agitator
    Date posted: 3/3/2010 2:22:50 AM
    Hometown: Los Angeles

    Comment:

    Go to www.socalvoice.net to read my article.

  • Name: Karen M.
    Date posted: 2/28/2010 9:13:11 PM
    Hometown: New York

    Comment:

    The paragraph on social programs during the 1960s was completely unnecessary and very inaccurate. Not only did this paragraph make little sense, but it was clearly not thoroughly researched. Buying into the racist "welfare mother" myth--a lazy, unwed black woman, having children to fatten her wallet--is like buying into the "gay men are child molesters" myth. A small handful of outliers do not define a population. Welfare rarely encouraged anyone to stay jobless and poor (welfare certainly doesn't make anyone wealthy), rather, overt and covert discrimination keep families in housing projects across generations. Also, kindly share your reference where you learned about the "massive infusions of money" that flowed into urban public schools, but failed to give students a way out, because that was never the trend in our country. I agree with you on one account in this paragraph; these programs certainly didn't help alleviate racism and discrimination. Passing legislation, including the Civil Rights Act, might alter systems in some ways but it doesn't change the biases of the people overseeing and acting within the systems. This is the case for racism and will be the case for heterosexism--Affirmative Action won't help individual biases one bit. So, while I also agree with your overall conclusion, you should be careful what arguments (and references) you use to get there.

  • Name: Lincoln Rose
    Date posted: 2/23/2010 3:51:36 AM
    Hometown: Seattle, WA

    Comment:

    "None of us ever needed affirmative action.." I love this whole idea that because you and a small group of your friends had everything handed to you and had a bunch of opportunity that gave you a clearer space to work hard and achieve from, that everyone else should be able to do as well as you've done without any problem. We are not all just like you. And most of us do NOT have higher incomes than straight people. That was a small, very select sample size run by a MARKETING firm. So of course wealthier people are going to answer that ad. I really wish people would stop repeating that myth. It makes invisible the lives of so many of us out here on food stamps, disability, welfare, or who really do work our tails off and still make less than 25,000/year. (As I did right before I got sick). I really wish that rich white gay men would stop universalizing and mouthing off like they speak for the whole community. To riff off my friend Chris: "Your anus is not a village."

  • Name: John Sebastian
    Date posted: 2/16/2010 9:39:19 AM
    Hometown: Minneapolis, MN

    Comment:

    "Could [gay affirmative action] result in more discrimination?" In a word, yes. Because, IMHO, "affirmative action" is another form of discrimination. A hiring decision should be based on the applicant's qualilfactions to do the job, period. Sexual orientation, gender, race, etc. - if not bona fide qualifications for the job in question - are irrelevant.

  • Name: Joseph G. Markle
    Date posted: 2/12/2010 10:58:40 PM
    Hometown: Reading, Pa

    Comment:

    Gay Marriage..Affirmative action? Alternative lifestyles now becoming respectable? What happened to group sex and outrageous gay ORGIES? ...FUN! TO HELL WITH GAY MARRIAGE AND PUBLIC REFERENDUMS! Who needs kids or joint tac returns....pillars of society...she's so repectable...This was supposed to be something new in the world...now its becoming....old hat and boring. I get more affection from my pets than all those guys on gay websites. Emails are never answered. Nobody calls me. I sleep alone for 50 years. Now, something like the French Revolution would work better..just round em up and execute them enmasse. And demolish the bastilles of America. I'd like to emmigrate but am too old.... Those adult toys for 10$ are more fun than all of you! And I did not like Brokeback Mountain, The Titanic or Avatar....sentimental kitsch! ...adieu to the 350,000 who died from AIDS...I remember...they had their fun!

  • Name: Mike Haverty
    Date posted: 2/12/2010 5:31:30 PM
    Hometown: Providence, Rhode Island

    Comment:

    Affirmative action for gay people would essentially admitt we GLBT people need a hand up because our credentials don't make the grade. Gay people are not as good as the majority of Americans which is false. Most gay people have more education and better incomes than their straight counterparts. ,The majority of my friends are college educated with good jobs and yes they are gay men. None of us ever needed affirmative action. I never needed any help from the government and consider people who do as weak. How is somebody going to tell if you are gay or not unless you want them to know it? Asking somebody if they are gay during a job interview is illegal so affirmative action for gay people is impractical and in general a stupid idea!

  • Name: Fredie A. Twiggs
    Date posted: 2/12/2010 2:21:16 PM
    Hometown: liveoak,fl

    Comment:

    What we need is our own NAACP-like organization. It would handle everything from poor media representation,presenting issues before all levels of government and providing a "this our reality" matterfact-ness to all slings and arrows of our neighbors. It also provide a sounding board for those of us who feel our voice will never be heard. The other issue of the job thing, If you are qualified and meet the requirements you shoud be entitleed to the fruits of your labors. Your happiness or acceptance is really depending the person facing the challenge.

  • Name: justa man
    Date posted: 2/12/2010 12:31:10 PM
    Hometown: nashville, tn

    Comment:

    i agree, stonewaller, and further i so wish gays could get past being victims. the world does not owe us anything for being gay. we want to slap everyone in the face with our sexuality, then get mad when they bawk (ie:adam lambert and his "performance" on the american music awards). while we are free to do whatever we wish, we need to remember that such actions reflect on ALL of us not just the one acting out. then to turn around and make such statements as "i'm gay, get over it!" is completely unnecessary. gays have to be willing to live up to the same standards as everyone else if we are to be respected and treated like everyone else. we get mad because tv doesnt post gay themed commercials then we submit two guys mauling each other as a suitable ad for showing on the superbowl. we preach diversity and equality, yet we discriminate against straight people just as we say they discriminate against us. maybe we need to look in the mirror at ourselves a little more.....just sayin'

  • Name: Stonewaller
    Date posted: 2/12/2010 11:18:59 AM
    Hometown: Washington DC

    Comment:

    Jim As a veteran of the Black Civil Rights, Feminist and Gay Rights Movements, I could not agree with you more. Affirmative Action is a poor substitute for the societally supported assumption of individual responsibility. By the way, it is not only small minded majorities who question the qualifications of some minorities. Many fellow minority group members do so as well.

  • Name: Stonewaller
    Date posted: 2/12/2010 11:13:16 AM
    Hometown: Washington DC

    Comment:

    MARIO It is too bad that more of the world's people do not migrate to the bicultural utopia that is Canada instead of the American "den of iniquity" that is the most heterogeneous nation on earth. Hopefully in the coming years, more and more disenchanted LGBT will follow to Canada the Draft Dodgers of the Vietnam War era. We could do a lot more with less population. More than elsewhere within the US, the Norman influence may be felt in the state of Louisiana which in that sense at least is much like Quebec. Last I heard, LGBT were not running in their Levis to the levees. The Puritan influence can be felt more in the New England states such as Massachusetts, Vermont and New Hampshire where Same Sex Marriage is Legal French kissing is one thing; kissing the French is quite another. Just ask anybody who has received the requisite rebuke at the hands of a Frenchman when attempting to speak Francais -- an attack inflicted by no other linguistic group on the planet.



Don't Miss
  • Best of Broadway How Broadway Does a Flea Market

    Find out why actress Kathleen Chalfant calls the annual Flea Market and Grand Auction in Times Square "the most glamorous flea market you've ever seen." It raised half a million dollars to fight HIV/AIDS.

  • News Is CPAC Illegally Discriminating Against Gays?

    Fred Karger once again isn't being allowed a table at one of the GOP's biggest annual gatherings, and this time he's threatening legal action because he believes he's being discriminated against because he's gay.

  • News Obama Makes the Case for Fairness
     

    He made the case for “a return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility” — a theme pertinent for an LGBT community facing disproportionate poverty rates and legal barriers to equal rights.

  • Film Mosquita y Mari’s Path to Sundance

    Director Aurora Guerrero talks to The Advocate about the making of her new film and how she believes mainstream media simplifies the lives of LGBT and Latino characters.

  • Film Young & Wild: A Director’s Perspective

    The director and cowriter of Young & Wild, a film about a teen struggling to reconcile her raging sexual drive with an evangelical upbringing, writes about making the film and her own life growing up lesbian in Chile.

  • Arts and Entertainment Hot Sheet

    The top 10 entertainment highlights on our gaydar this week: Ross Mathews takes over, Mrs. Danvers fondles again, while Halston and Carol Channing get documented.

  • Travel Slideshow Flag Gayest Cities in America, 2012

    It's no secret that megalopolises New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles have robust LGBT life — and we've even heard tell of little queer hoods like the Castro and P-Town. This isn't that list.

 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity
 
COVER 1055 X135 | ADVOCATE.COM
Today's Headlines