Indian Supreme Court Recognizes Third Gender
BY Sunnivie Brydum
April 15 2014 4:01 PM ET
The Supreme Court of India has just guaranteed the nation's transgender population a litany of rights, including equal access to education and employment, reports the BBC.
In a landmark ruling today, the high court declared that "it is the right of every human being to choose their gender," granting formal, legal recognition to Indians who identify as neither male nor female, or those who identify as transgender women, known as hijra. Members of this group occupy a peculiar space — they are often sought after to perform at elaborate ceremonies, but shunned from public life and enduring abject poverty, often turning to begging or sex work to survive.
The two-judge panel ordered the government to establish employment and education quotas for transgender citizens, similar to those that already exist for other minorities in the country.
"Recognition of transponders [sic] as a third gender is not a social or medical issue but a human rights issue," wrote Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan in the decision, according to the BBC. "Transgenders [sic] are also citizens of India," who must be "provided equal opportunity to grow. … The spirit of the Constitution is to provide equal opportunity to every citizen to grow and attain their potential, irrespective of caste, religion, or gender."
The ruling was declarative in stating that transgender Indians have a right to competent medical care and access to separate hospital wards and restrooms.
Trans advocates celebrated the victory, anticipating the wide-reaching positive impact it will have on this oft-downtrodden minority.
"We are quite thrilled by the judgment," Anita Shenoy, counsel for the National Legal Services Authority, which brought the case, told the BBC. "The court order gives legal sanctity to the third gender."
India has offered a modicum of recognition to its gender-nonconforming citizens since 2009, when voters were allowed to register their gender as "other" on ballots submitted to the Election Commission.
While Tuesday's ruling is an important step toward full equality for transgender Indians, the BBC notes that some may find themselves in a peculiar legal situation, given the country's recently reenacted ban on consensual sex acts between members of the same sex. Last December the Supreme Court struck down a 2009 Delhi High Court ruling that invalidated a colonial-era prohibition on gay sex, reinstating Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which imposes 10-year prison sentences on anyone committing "carnal intercourse against the order of nature with man, woman, or animal." The law has been widely interpreted to amount to a prohibition on any gay sex acts, regardless of the consent of the parties involved.
Although the Supreme Court initially denied a petition to reconsider that ruling, it announced earlier this month that it will reconsider its December ruling, responding to the ongoing demands of LGBT activists outraged by the decision.
- Op-ed: Male Gays and the Male Gaze
- Artist Spotlight: Carlos Barahona Possollo
- Op-ed: Madonna, My Father, and a Life Outside a Tiny Island
- Pope Francis Holds Private Meeting With Transgender Man and Fiancée
- A Best-Case, Worst-Case Look at the Supreme Court's Options
- Everything You Need to Know Now About Marriage Equality in Michigan