Minnesotans Consider Next Step Toward Marriage Equality

At a summit over the weekend, some proposed bringing the issue up in the state legislature as early as January.

Trudy Ring

Trudy Ring is The Advocate’s senior politics editor and copy chief. She has been a reporter and editor for daily newspapers and LGBTQ+ weeklies/monthlies, trade magazines, and reference books. She is a political junkie who thinks even the wonkiest details are fascinating, and she always loves to see political candidates who are groundbreaking in some way. She enjoys writing about other topics as well, including religion (she’s interested in what people believe and why), literature, theater, and film. Trudy is a proud “old movie weirdo” and loves the Hollywood films of the 1930s and ’40s above all others. Other interests include classic rock music (Bruce Springsteen rules!) and history. Oh, and she was a Jeopardy! contestant back in 1998 and won two games. Not up there with Amy Schneider, but Trudy still takes pride in this achievement.

Read Full Bio

Trudy Ring

December 03 2012 7:44 PM EST

trudestress

We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.

Having turned back an anti-equality constitutional amendment, Minnesota marriage equality activists gathered Saturday to discuss their next move, including the possibility of introducing a marriage bill in the state legislature as early as January.

"We have a Democratic House, Senate and governor," said Ruth Larson, a participant in the Equality and Justice Summit in Minneapolis, according to Minnesota Public Radio. "Strike while the iron's hot."

Another attendee, Democratic state representative Alice Hausman, said that since work on the state's budget has to wait for revenue forecasts, due in February, lawmakers should consider marriage equality legislation in January.

"Some people say, 'Well, that means we get off track of the budget.' And we shouldn't have other issues dominate," Hausman said. "But if we don't deal with this immediately, I would argue it's going to dominate anyway because it hangs out there."

Not all party members and activists agreed that the time is right. "We're not close enough to win unless we move some legislators to make what for them might be a challenging decision," said activist Michelle Dibblee. "To do that they need to hear from constituents, and for those legislators to hear from constituents, we need to continue to organize. What we'll be doing over the course of the next six months is helping you all to connect more deeply in your communities, particularly in those places where we think there are legislators who need constituent pressure to be moved."