A California
appeals court ruled that two fertility doctors had the right
to refuse to artificially inseminate a lesbian based on her
marital status because it would have violated their
religious beliefs. The ruling reversed a lower-court
decision that physicians Christine Brody and Douglas
Fenton could not use religion as a defense against a lawsuit
filed by Guadalupe Benitez.
The panel found
that the doctors were within their rights to base their
decision on Benitez's unmarried status because
discrimination based on marital status is not
prohibited by state law.
Benitez, 33, sued
the doctors and their small practice in Vista, Calif.,
in 2001, claiming their actions violated California's
antidiscrimination laws. Benitez was eventually
treated elsewhere and gave birth to a boy who is now 3
years old.
In her suit
Benitez claims that Brody told her in 1999 that her
religious beliefs prevented her from helping a
homosexual conceive a child by artificial insemination
but that other physicians at the practice would be
able to help her.
The next year,
Benitez said, she was told that both Brody and Fenton were
unable to help her because they did not feel comfortable
with her sexual orientation.
The doctors
contend they denied treatment because Benitez and her
registered domestic partner of 15 years were not married.
But Benitez's attorneys said she was denied because of
her sexual orientation, not her marital status.
An attorney for a
gay rights group said the decision would be appealed to
the California supreme court. "We fear this decision is
going to worsen the confusion in the minds of the
public about whether you can legally discriminate in
the name of religion," said Jennifer Pizer, attorney
for Lambda Legal. "The bottom line is that you should not be
able to treat patients in a discriminatory way."
The case appears
to be the first in the country in which a gay or lesbian
patient was allowed to sue doctors over charges that
treatment was denied based on sexual orientation. (AP)