CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
New Hampshire governor Craig Benson says he needs another couple of weeks to decide what to do about his nominee to the Human Rights Commission. Three of the five members of the executive council oppose confirming Gary Daniels to the post because of antigay comments Daniels made when he was a state representative. Benson did not ask the council to vote on the nomination at a regular council meeting Wednesday. The governor said he has been focusing on the state budget and hasn't looked into the Daniels nomination in light of the opposition that arose after he nominated him last month. "I need some more time to address this," Benson told reporters. Benson said he was not aware of all Daniels's comments, which Daniels made while arguing against a bill that would extend civil rights protections to gay men and lesbians. "I was not aware of all of the comments he has made in any context, by and large," he said. "But I know he has the respect of a lot of people and has done a great job for the state of New Hampshire, so those credentials stood on their own." The bill that Daniels opposed was signed into law by Gov. Jeanne Shaheen. Benson emphasized that he is committed to upholding all state laws but declined to say whether he agrees with the gay rights legislation, noting that he commented on it during his campaign for governor: At a GOP candidates' forum in August, Benson was asked if he would try to repeal New Hampshire's ban on antigay discrimination. "I don't think we need to have laws that specify one person's preferences over somebody else's and treat them differently or treat them better," Benson said at the forum. "So no, I don't think we need any laws like that at all."
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Texas expands lawsuits against doctors accused of providing gender-affirming care to youth
December 11 2025 4:36 PM
How Sundance 2026 celebrates its queer legacy
December 11 2025 3:54 PM
George Santos’s exclusive D.C. Christmas party featured famous grifters & MAGA influence peddlers
December 11 2025 3:31 PM
Nancy Mace investigated for bad behavior at airport, blames transgender people
December 11 2025 1:11 PM
Pete Buttigieg mocks Trump Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy’s strange airport pull-up stunt
December 11 2025 1:00 PM
Appeals court mulls upholding ruling that struck down Pentagon’s HIV enlistment ban
December 11 2025 11:51 AM
Florida sues leading medical groups for supporting gender-affirming care
December 11 2025 11:02 AM
Behind Marjorie Taylor Greene's latest push to criminalize gender-affirming care
December 10 2025 9:09 PM
Queer actor Wenne Alton Davis, known for 'Maisel,' 'Normal Heart,' killed in NYC car crash
December 10 2025 5:14 PM
‘Proud’ pro-LGBTQ+ Democrat flips Republican state House seat in Georgia electoral upset
December 10 2025 4:05 PM
Texas city votes to overturn LGBTQ+ antidiscrimination protections
December 10 2025 4:03 PM
Pornhub's spicy stats prove just how horny 2025 was
December 10 2025 3:30 PM
'Heated Rivalry' stars thank WeHo gay bar for 'tweeting about our butts'
December 10 2025 2:55 PM



































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes