CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Wisconsin lawmakers and conservative groups are fighting for a constitutional amendment to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman. Fearing their rights and way of life are under attack, gay rights groups and their supporters are fighting to keep things as is. Both sides are gearing up for the final push in the debate over the proposed amendment, which will have a public hearing Tuesday in the state capitol. The amendment must be approved by consecutive two-year sessions of the legislature before it can go to voters in a statewide referendum. Lawmakers easily approved the amendment under first consideration last year, and groups on both sides of the debate acknowledge they are likely to approve it again. That means the next 11 months will see campaigns from both sides to win over voters in anticipation of a statewide referendum on the November general election ballot. Texas became the 19th state to approve a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage; none of the states that have put a proposed amendment on the ballot have seen it defeated. After Tuesday's public hearing, committees in both chambers are expected vote on the amendment. If lawmakers approve it again, Wisconsin voters will be asked for an up or down vote on whether to amend the constitution to limit marriage to one man and one woman while prohibiting legal recognition of any relationship "identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals." Voters cannot change the language of the amendment, and opponents are hoping to counter it on several fronts. One, they hope to show gay and lesbian couples and families to put a human face on what they say is an effort to discriminate. Two, they hope to play on concerns the amendment would prohibit granting any recognition to unmarried couples, such as health care benefits. Madison and Milwaukee have domestic-partner registries for same-sex couples that are largely symbolic. Several Wisconsin school districts also offer health care benefits for unmarried couples, as do two technical colleges. The state and University of Wisconsin system do not. Last year the city of Madison and Dane County released opinions from their lawyers saying the amendment could bar them from offering health insurance to domestic partners. Joshua Freker, spokesman for the gay rights group Action Wisconsin, which opposes the amendment, said opponents believe the amendment could have an even further reach than that. In Michigan, the attorney general issued a legal opinion that a similar amendment bars public employers from offering domestic-partner benefits. In Ohio, a judge ruled an amendment there prohibits the filing of domestic violence charges against unmarried people. "We want to make sure people know, even if they are uncertain about the question of marriage, that this amendment is more far-reaching than that," Freker said. The amendment does not clearly define at what point a relationship recognized by the state becomes "identical or substantially similar" to marriage. If the amendment were approved, lawsuits would likely ensue to define which relationships between nonmarried people could still be recognized. Should lawmakers approve the amendment, the Department of Justice will do an analysis to estimate what the impact would be. Both sides are now ramping up their efforts to lobby on the amendment, which surfaced after Gov. Jim Doyle vetoed legislation more than two years ago to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The governor argued that state law already limits marriage to a man and a wife, but amendment supporters have argued that a judge could overrule state statutes and force recognition of same-sex marriages as has happened in Massachusetts. Action Wisconsin, meanwhile, has grown to 14 staffers from two. It has been actively working with various religious organizations to oppose the amendment and has won support from several of them. "We want them to see this amendment will have an impact on real people that live in their communities," Freker said. (AP)
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
'Jeopardy!' champ Amy Schneider schools Pete Hegseth on drag in the military
November 07 2025 7:44 PM
Florida attorney general calls for cancellation of 'demonic' Christmas drag show in Pensacola
November 07 2025 5:16 PM
How the government shutdown is affecting LGBTQ+ people — and what bad legislation is upcoming
November 07 2025 4:43 PM
10 LGBTQ+ leaders who've changed the face of global politics
November 07 2025 10:15 AM
Nancy Pelosi, retiring from Congress, leaves a record as a champion of LGBTQ+ equality
November 06 2025 4:28 PM
10 queer slang words that defined the internet in 2025
November 06 2025 4:07 PM
Raven-Symoné shares her opinion on former co-star Bill Cosby
November 06 2025 4:04 PM
Supreme Court allows Trump administration's anti-trans and anti-nonbinary passport policy (for now)
November 06 2025 3:46 PM
D.C. 'sandwich guy' not guilty of assaulting a federal agent, jury finds
November 06 2025 3:44 PM
Why trans storytelling in film is more important than ever
November 06 2025 1:31 PM
Wisconsin bill would allow lawsuits against doctors that provide gender-affirming care
November 06 2025 12:57 PM
Nancy Pelosi, fierce LGBTQ+ ally, announces retirement
November 06 2025 9:04 AM
Is marriage equality at risk? Understanding Kim Davis's Supreme Court appeal
November 06 2025 7:05 AM
AOC says this is why Marjorie Taylor Greene turned on Trump
November 05 2025 6:20 PM
6 historic gayborhoods you should visit in 2026 that are still thriving
November 05 2025 3:40 PM
Trending stories
Recommended Stories for You

































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes