Scroll To Top
World

Fate of
Connecticut marriage case in hands of state's high court

Fate of
Connecticut marriage case in hands of state's high court

Conn_capital_1

The long-simmering question of whether same-sex couples in Connecticut should be allowed to marry is now in the hands of seven state supreme court justices.

Support The Advocate
LGBTQ+ stories are more important than ever. Join us in fighting for our future. Support our journalism.

The long-simmering question of whether same-sex couples in Connecticut should be allowed to marry is now in the hands of seven state supreme court justices.

Arguments in the potentially groundbreaking case wrapped up in about three hours Monday, but it likely will be months before justices rule on the lawsuit that eight same-sex couples originally filed in August 2004.

The couples, who have been together between 13 and 31 years, allege that their guarantees of equal protection and due process were violated when they were denied marriage licenses in Madison Town Hall.

Their case also raises questions about whether the state's 2005 civil unions law--the first adopted nationwide without court pressure--helped or hurt same-sex couples in their quest for equality.

The plaintiffs want the court to rule that the state's marriage law discriminates against them because it applies only to heterosexual couples, therefore denying gay couples the financial, social, and emotional benefits of marriage.

''What is denied to these families is something that goes to the heart of equal protection, which is the right to be part of the fabric of society when they are just the same as other couples and other families,'' said their attorney, Bennett Klein.

The state argued Monday that Connecticut's civil unions law gives the couples the equality they seek and that the issue is a policy question best left to lawmakers rather than judges.

''All of those rights and benefits, at least under state law, have been granted,'' Asst. Atty. Gen. Jane Rosenberg said. ''From a legal perspective, there are no rights that have been taken away from that group, and, in fact, equal rights have now been given to that group.''

As several states consider civil union laws, the Connecticut case could have nationwide ramifications. People on both sides said Monday they are well aware of its significance.

''Our 9-year-old said it best: 'How is the world supposed to get better if nothing changes?' '' said Geraldine Artis of Clinton, who is a plaintiff along with her partner of 13 years, Suzanne Artis.

One recurring theme at Monday's hearing was whether gays and lesbians should be considered a protected group--a legal term for a segment of the population that, among other things, is particularly vulnerable to discrimination and lacks political power.

Peter Wolfgang, public policy director for the Family Institute of Connecticut, which opposes same-sex marriage, said that claim is weak. He cited the existence of Connecticut's civil unions law, the growing number of openly gay lawmakers in powerful positions, and a recent legislative committee vote in favor of same-sex marriages.

''I think it would be very hard to argue that gays and lesbians are powerless in Connecticut in 2007,'' Wolfgang said after the hearing.

If justices agree with the same-sex couples, they could order the case back to the trial court, with instructions to rule in favor of the couples. They could also order the general assembly to consider overhauling the current marriage laws.

Currently, only Massachusetts allows same-sex couples to marry.

Connecticut, Vermont, California, New Jersey, Maine, and Washington have laws recognizing either civil unions or domestic partnerships, and a civil unions law is expected to take effect in New Hampshire in January. Hawaii extends certain spousal rights to same-sex couples and cohabiting heterosexual pairs. (Stephanie Reitz, AP)

Stonewall Brick AwardsOut / Advocate Magazine - Jonathan Groff & Wayne Brady

From our Sponsors

Most Popular

Latest Stories

Outtraveler Staff