CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Proponents of a Maine ballot measure to repeal marriage rights for
same-sex couples in November have emphasized the need for "real
Mainers" to speak out in television and radio spots for their cause.
But the anti-equality playbook is straight out of California.
A recent ad for Yes on Question 1 tapped Charla Bansley, a private school teacher in Ellsworth, Maine, who also happens to moonlight as state director of the conservative group Concerned Women for America, to use a well-worn boogeyman strategy: Shift the argument from equality and discrimination directly to gay marriage being taught in public schools.
The strategy was the linchpin behind the Proposition 8 campaign, which stripped same-sex couples of marriage rights through a constitutional amendment. Schubert-Flint Public Affairs, the Sacramento, Calif.-based political consultancy firm that ran the Prop. 8 campaign, was tapped by Stand for Marriage Maine (financially backed by the National Organization for Marriage) to be Yes on 1's campaign manager.
"[Question 1] has everything to do with schools!" Bansley says in a recent TV ad. Standing in a classroom, she then clicks on a television that shows a Massachusetts Mormon couple whose son's second-grade class had read the children's book King & King by Linda de Haan and Stern Nijland. The couple, Robin and Robb Wirthlin, were also used in ads that ran throughout California during the Prop. 8 fight.
The Wirthlins sued the school, but lost. A U.S. court of appeals ruled that "public schools are not obliged to shield students from ideas which are potentially offensive to their parents" (the U.S. Supreme Court subsequently declined to hear the case).
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
FBI agents fired for kneeling at George Floyd protest sue Kash Patel and other officials
December 08 2025 4:46 PM
Colin Allred targets first LGBTQ+ congresswoman from Texas for House seat as Jasmine Crockett runs for Senate
December 08 2025 4:00 PM
True
There are no out NHL players. Could 'Heated Rivalry' change that?
December 08 2025 3:26 PM
World Cup LGBTQ+ Pride Match will feature two countries where being gay is illegal
December 08 2025 1:33 PM
Marjorie Taylor Greene says Trump was 'extremely angry' over vote to release Epstein files
December 08 2025 11:58 AM
Cynthia Erivo makes Golden Globes history with second nomination
December 08 2025 11:48 AM
Another University of Oklahoma instructor suspended in biblical psychology paper grading controversy
December 08 2025 10:01 AM
The next out member of Congress may be a gay man from Utah
December 08 2025 7:00 AM
Opinion: When museums go silent, erasure speaks louder
December 08 2025 6:00 AM
HHS replaces name on transgender admiral’s official portrait with deadname in act of ‘pettiness and bigotry’
December 05 2025 8:57 PM
True
Joe Biden says MAGA Republicans want to make LGBTQ+ people ‘into something scary’
December 05 2025 8:20 PM
'Finding Prince Charming's Chad Spodick dies at 42
December 05 2025 3:45 PM
Supreme Court to hear case on Trump order limiting birthright citizenship
December 05 2025 3:01 PM




































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes