CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Proponents of a Maine ballot measure to repeal marriage rights for
same-sex couples in November have emphasized the need for "real
Mainers" to speak out in television and radio spots for their cause.
But the anti-equality playbook is straight out of California.
A recent ad for Yes on Question 1 tapped Charla Bansley, a private school teacher in Ellsworth, Maine, who also happens to moonlight as state director of the conservative group Concerned Women for America, to use a well-worn boogeyman strategy: Shift the argument from equality and discrimination directly to gay marriage being taught in public schools.
The strategy was the linchpin behind the Proposition 8 campaign, which stripped same-sex couples of marriage rights through a constitutional amendment. Schubert-Flint Public Affairs, the Sacramento, Calif.-based political consultancy firm that ran the Prop. 8 campaign, was tapped by Stand for Marriage Maine (financially backed by the National Organization for Marriage) to be Yes on 1's campaign manager.
"[Question 1] has everything to do with schools!" Bansley says in a recent TV ad. Standing in a classroom, she then clicks on a television that shows a Massachusetts Mormon couple whose son's second-grade class had read the children's book King & King by Linda de Haan and Stern Nijland. The couple, Robin and Robb Wirthlin, were also used in ads that ran throughout California during the Prop. 8 fight.
The Wirthlins sued the school, but lost. A U.S. court of appeals ruled that "public schools are not obliged to shield students from ideas which are potentially offensive to their parents" (the U.S. Supreme Court subsequently declined to hear the case).
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Gen Z men do care about abortion, actually
November 14 2025 11:26 AM
Texas A&M bans teaching 'race or gender ideology' at universities
November 14 2025 11:17 AM
TSA officer sues Kristi Noem over trans personnel being banned from doing pat-downs
November 14 2025 10:07 AM
Which gayborhoods are the most affordable? These are the top 10 — all under $300k
November 14 2025 7:00 AM
A devastating reality: New report finds violence and erasure ahead of Transgender Day of Remembrance
November 13 2025 5:09 PM
Laura Dern says the love from her LGBTQ+ fans has been 'the greatest gift ever'
November 13 2025 4:55 PM
Watch 15 videos of LGBTQ+ and ally protestors making clowns of ICE
November 13 2025 4:53 PM
Christy Martin calls Sydney Sweeney an 'ally' amid epic 'Christy' flop
November 13 2025 4:50 PM
Gay NYC city council member Erik Bottcher joins Jack Schlossberg in packed race for Jerry Nadler’s House seat
November 13 2025 2:19 PM
True
Which gayborhoods are the most expensive? Here are the top 10
November 13 2025 1:35 PM
Democratic lawmaker calls Libs of TikTok's Chaya Raichik a 'pedophile protector'
November 13 2025 12:54 PM
Catholic Church formally bans gender-affirming care at its hospitals
November 13 2025 11:22 AM
Newly sworn-in Rep. Adelita Grijalva vows to protect LGBTQ+ rights in fiery floor speech
November 13 2025 10:03 AM
12 far-right groups with extreme anti-LGBTQ+ positions that threaten civil rights
November 12 2025 5:03 PM
HRC drops sponsorships from weapons manufacturers after pressure from advocacy groups
November 12 2025 3:15 PM

































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes