CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Proponents of a Maine ballot measure to repeal marriage rights for
same-sex couples in November have emphasized the need for "real
Mainers" to speak out in television and radio spots for their cause.
But the anti-equality playbook is straight out of California.
A recent ad for Yes on Question 1 tapped Charla Bansley, a private school teacher in Ellsworth, Maine, who also happens to moonlight as state director of the conservative group Concerned Women for America, to use a well-worn boogeyman strategy: Shift the argument from equality and discrimination directly to gay marriage being taught in public schools.
The strategy was the linchpin behind the Proposition 8 campaign, which stripped same-sex couples of marriage rights through a constitutional amendment. Schubert-Flint Public Affairs, the Sacramento, Calif.-based political consultancy firm that ran the Prop. 8 campaign, was tapped by Stand for Marriage Maine (financially backed by the National Organization for Marriage) to be Yes on 1's campaign manager.
"[Question 1] has everything to do with schools!" Bansley says in a recent TV ad. Standing in a classroom, she then clicks on a television that shows a Massachusetts Mormon couple whose son's second-grade class had read the children's book King & King by Linda de Haan and Stern Nijland. The couple, Robin and Robb Wirthlin, were also used in ads that ran throughout California during the Prop. 8 fight.
The Wirthlins sued the school, but lost. A U.S. court of appeals ruled that "public schools are not obliged to shield students from ideas which are potentially offensive to their parents" (the U.S. Supreme Court subsequently declined to hear the case).
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Sarah Paulson & Holland Taylor's cutest moments on the Walk of Fame
December 03 2025 3:25 PM
Here's what Zohran Mamdani has promised to do for LGBTQ+ New Yorkers as mayor
December 03 2025 2:20 PM
Upstate New York Methodist minister comes out as transgender to congregation during Sunday service
December 03 2025 9:24 AM
Transgender Army vet running for state delegate in red Maryland district is all about showing up
December 03 2025 7:00 AM
7 times Pete Hegseth was the definition of toxic masculinity
December 02 2025 5:46 PM
Man pleads guilty to murder of gay University of Mississippi student Jimmie 'Jay' Lee
December 02 2025 2:32 PM
Florida man partially paralyzed after neighbor allegedly shot him and used anti-LGBTQ+ slurs
December 02 2025 1:30 PM
Queer comedian Cameron Esposito has first baby with wife Katy Nishimoto
December 02 2025 12:49 PM
Trans National Guard employee in Illinois sues Trump over restroom ban
December 02 2025 11:59 AM
Oklahoma University instructor suspended for failing student’s unscientific anti-trans psychology essay
December 02 2025 11:03 AM




































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes