
CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Massachusetts attorney general Martha Coakley (pictured, left) is defending Barbara Lenk (right), a lesbian nominee to the state's supreme court, against accusations that Lenk supports "homosexual incest," The Boston Globereports.
Lenk, currently a justice on the Massachusetts appeals court, joined in a 2000 ruling by that court that the state's incest law prohibited only heterosexual intercourse between family members, not any other type of sexual contact, including that involving people of the same sex. As a result of the ruling, the state legislature changed the law.
Some opponents of Lenk's appointment to the Massachusetts supreme judicial court have brought up this ruling and others regarding the old law to characterize the justice as a supporter of same-sex incest. But Lenk was merely interpreting the law as it was written, Coakley noted in a letter to the Governor's Council, the panel that confirms the state's judicial appointments and is expected to vote on Lenk's confirmation Wednesday. It is "laughable" and "misleading" to suggest that Lenk endorses incestuous relationships, Coakley wrote.
Lenk, nominated to the high court by Gov. Deval Patrick, would be the first openly gay or lesbian member of that body. But even though Massachusetts, as the first state to have marriage equality, has often been in the forefront on LGBT rights, Lenk's road to confirmation has been rough. A member of the Governor's Council questioned whether Lenk notified other appeals court justices about a potential conflict of interest when her wife, attorney Debra S. Krupp, appeared before the court, and some criticized Patrick for mentioning Lenk's sexual orientation when he announced her nomination.
Recently two Boston Herald columnists offered competing views on Lenk's confirmation process. Margery Eagan remarked that some Lenk opponents appearing at a confirmation hearing "seemed unhinged," while Howie Carr asserted that support for the justice demonstrates that "political correctness trumps all." Read Eagan's full column here and Carr's here.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Pete Buttigieg blasts Trump's rant against air traffic controllers and the Biden administration
November 11 2025 3:57 PM
Sarah McBride explains how Democrats’ ‘big tent is bisexual’
November 11 2025 1:39 PM
12 far-right influencers targeting the LGBTQ+ community
November 11 2025 10:02 AM
Meet the lesbian minister whose church clapped back at Texas's ban on rainbow crosswalks
November 11 2025 9:37 AM
Newly elected Virginia lieutenant governor appoints LGBTQ+ advocate to transition team
November 11 2025 9:35 AM
17 queer clergy taking the Gospel back from Christian nationalism
November 11 2025 6:00 AM
Transgender Air Force members sue Trump administration over revoked retirements
November 10 2025 6:37 PM
21 LGBTQ+ movies and TV shows we can't wait to see in 2026
November 10 2025 5:04 PM
Why most LGBTQ+ Congress members oppose deal to end government shutdown
November 10 2025 4:44 PM
15 lesbian led TV shows & where to watch them
November 10 2025 4:11 PM
Candis Cayne discusses new film 'Witchy Ways'—tells trans youth, 'Your aunties are here'
November 10 2025 2:17 PM
































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes