Scroll To Top
World

India Supreme Court Won't Reconsider Antigay Ruling

India Supreme Court Won't Reconsider Antigay Ruling

377_iamgayx400

The court today refused to review its December decision reinstating a law that criminalizes gay sex.

trudestress

India's Supreme Court today refused to reconsider its December decision that recriminalized gay sex in the nation.

The court dismissed petitions from the Indian government and LGBT rights groups seeking a review of the ruling, which reinstated a law, dating from the British colonial era, "which says a same-sex relationship is an 'unnatural offence' and punishable by a 10-year jail term," according to the BBC.

The Delhi High Court struck down the law in 2009, but the Supreme Court overturned that ruling December 11, saying only Parliament, not the courts, could change the law -- Section 377 of the nation's penal code, which prohibits activities described as "carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal."

In their petition for a rehearing, activists including the Naz Foundation pointed out that many LGBT people had come out since the 2009 ruling and now faced prosecution, reports India Today. They also noted that criminalizing gay sex impeded HIV prevention efforts and that most of all, it was a violation of fundamental human rights.

"Although the law has rarely -- if ever -- been used to prosecute anyone for consensual sex, it has often been used by the police to harass homosexuals," the BBC notes.

Activists expressed disappointment with today's decision. "The Supreme Court has turned a cold shoulder to these groups and their suffering," Arvind Narrain, one of the lawyers representing the human rights organizations, told Reuters. "The court had an opportunity to correct itself today. This is a court that is meant to be for all human beings."

trudestress
30 Years of Out100Out / Advocate Magazine - Jonathan Groff & Wayne Brady

From our Sponsors

Most Popular

Latest Stories

Trudy Ring

Trudy Ring is The Advocate’s senior politics editor and copy chief. She has been a reporter and editor for daily newspapers and LGBTQ+ weeklies/monthlies, trade magazines, and reference books. She is a political junkie who thinks even the wonkiest details are fascinating, and she always loves to see political candidates who are groundbreaking in some way. She enjoys writing about other topics as well, including religion (she’s interested in what people believe and why), literature, theater, and film. Trudy is a proud “old movie weirdo” and loves the Hollywood films of the 1930s and ’40s above all others. Other interests include classic rock music (Bruce Springsteen rules!) and history. Oh, and she was a Jeopardy! contestant back in 1998 and won two games. Not up there with Amy Schneider, but Trudy still takes pride in this achievement.
Trudy Ring is The Advocate’s senior politics editor and copy chief. She has been a reporter and editor for daily newspapers and LGBTQ+ weeklies/monthlies, trade magazines, and reference books. She is a political junkie who thinks even the wonkiest details are fascinating, and she always loves to see political candidates who are groundbreaking in some way. She enjoys writing about other topics as well, including religion (she’s interested in what people believe and why), literature, theater, and film. Trudy is a proud “old movie weirdo” and loves the Hollywood films of the 1930s and ’40s above all others. Other interests include classic rock music (Bruce Springsteen rules!) and history. Oh, and she was a Jeopardy! contestant back in 1998 and won two games. Not up there with Amy Schneider, but Trudy still takes pride in this achievement.