CONTACTStaffCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2024 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates announced new enforcement regulations Thursday for the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, part of an interim plan while the Pentagon completes a full review.
The new guidelines, which are detailed here, are intended to enforce the existing policy in a fairer way. Changes announced by Secretary Gates will raise the rank of a person who can initiate a DADT inquiry to a general or admiral, and elevate standards for evidence to be presented in discharge cases, according to reports in The New York Times and Reuters. The changes also aim to lessen the number of expulsions based on "third party" outings.
"Officials said the new steps would include a requirement that only a general or admiral could initiate action in cases where service members were suspected of violating the prohibition against openly gay service in the armed forces," reported the Times.
A complete Pentagon review of how the military might implement a repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" is expected to be completed by December 1.
In a letter to Gates last July, Servicemembers Legal Defense Network executive director Aubrey Sarvis laid out a set of recommendations for what would/wouldn't meet the standard for triggering an investigation into someone's sexuality.
They included that the third party must be another service member, not a civilian, and not anonymous. They also suggested that evidence must be based on firsthand knowledge rather than hearsay, that any sexual misconduct occurring prior to a soldier's service not be deemed admissible, and that statements made to chaplains, doctors, psychologists, and other health professionals be kept off limits.
The letter also recommends that the Pentagon adopt as policy the ruling of the ninth circuit court of appeals in Maj. Margaret Witt's case (Witt v. Department of Air Force), which stipulated that the government must prove that a service member's presence disrupts unit cohesion and good order rather than the service member having to prove that his or her presence is not disruptive.
The letter is below in full:
Dear Secretary Gates:
I
am writing on behalf of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network to follow
up on your comments last week concerning the way the "Don't Ask, Don't
Tell" law has been implemented by the armed services.
SLDN is a
non-profit organization that provides free legal services to military
personnel affected by "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." Since 1993, we have
responded to more than 9,000 requests for legal assistance.
SLDN
advocates the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." While Congress is
considering repeal, we have urged that legislation be passed stopping
investigations of possible "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" violations. In
particular, we propose that the DOD authorization bill include the
following provision:
Directs the Secretary of Defense to instruct
the Secretaries of each of the armed services that there may be no
investigation of or inquiry into, or any administrative action relating
to, conduct described in 10 U.S.C. SS 654(b), "Policy concerning
homosexuality in the armed forces," until the end of the 111th Congress;
provided that, this shall not limit the authority of the Secretaries of
the armed services with respect to conduct that would violate the
Uniform Code of Military Justice.
We hope that you will consider
this proposal and that you will be able to support it.
In the
meantime, we would support any measures that would make the application
of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" less draconian. We believe that you have
flexibility in the way to apply "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and that you can
exercise this flexibility immediately. In particular, you can instruct
the services when it is permissible to initiate an inquiry or
investigation under that law, that
1. To be sufficient to
support the initiation of an inquiry into a possible violation of "Don't
Ask, Don't Tell," the source of the allegation must be another service
member. Information from a civilian is not sufficient.
2. An
anonymous tip is not a sufficient basis to start an inquiry into a
possible violation of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."
3. Hearsay cannot
support the initiation of an inquiry; the allegation must be based on
personal knowledge.
4. The alleged homosexual conduct must have
occurred after the service member joined the armed forces.
5.
Statements made to chaplains, doctors, psychologists and other health
professionals cannot be a basis of an inquiry into a possible violation
of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."
In addition, the Secretary should
ensure that the court's decision in Witt v. Dep't of Air Force, 527 F.3d
806 (9th Cir. 2008), is faithfully implemented and that it is applied
throughout the armed services. This decision requires the armed
services to handle DADT cases in a way that ensures that service
members' constitutional rights are not violated. In order to find a
violation of the policy and to order discharge of a service member, the
military must show that there is a justification for the application of
the policy to that particular service member and that there is no less
intrusive way to achieve the governmental interests recognized by the
court. Although this decision technically applies only in the nine
states and two territories that make up the Ninth Circuit, this standard
should be applied uniformly throughout the military.
These
changes would address the situations you referred to in your remarks as
well as other cases in which there could be no possible justification
for applying "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." Members of SLDN's legal staff and I
would be happy to meet with you and your legal advisors to discuss
these proposals.
Sincerely,
Aubrey Sarvis
Executive
Director
Servicemembers Legal Defense Network
Want more breaking equality news & trending entertainment stories?
Check out our NEW 24/7 streaming service: the Advocate Channel!
Download the Advocate Channel App for your mobile phone and your favorite streaming device!
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Here Are Our 2024 Election Predictions. Will They Come True?
November 07 2023 1:46 PM
Meet all 37 of the queer women in this season's WNBA
April 17 2024 11:24 AM
17 Celebs Who Are Out & Proud of Their Trans & Nonbinary Kids
November 30 2023 10:41 AM
Here Are the 15 Most LGBTQ-Friendly Cities in the U.S.
November 01 2023 5:09 PM
Which State Is the Queerest? These Are the States With the Most LGBTQ+ People
December 11 2023 10:00 AM
These 27 Senate Hearing Room Gay Sex Jokes Are Truly Exquisite
December 17 2023 3:33 PM
10 Cheeky and Homoerotic Photos From Bob Mizer's Nude Films
November 18 2023 10:05 PM
42 Flaming Hot Photos From 2024's Australian Firefighters Calendar
November 10 2023 6:08 PM
These Are the 5 States With the Smallest Percentage of LGBTQ+ People
December 13 2023 9:15 AM
Here are the 15 gayest travel destinations in the world: report
March 26 2024 9:23 AM
Watch Now: The Daily
Trending stories from our video partner Advocate Channel.
For more videos and shows go to advocatechannel.com.
Trending stories from our video partner Advocate Channel.
For more videos and shows go to advocatechannel.com.
Latest Stories
Over 90% of trans youth live in states pushing anti-trans legislation: report
April 23 2024 10:08 PM
George Santos pulls out of New York congressional race
April 23 2024 7:04 PM
Biden will hammer Trump over abortion bans in Florida speech
April 23 2024 5:00 AM
Tristan Snell, who brought down Trump University, sees conviction in hush money case
April 22 2024 7:36 PM
Joe Biden admin marks Earth Day with major environmental initiatives
April 22 2024 4:18 PM
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott: 'We want to end' trans and gender nonconforming teachers
April 22 2024 4:13 PM
Nonbinary 17-year-old killed two years after being reported missing
April 22 2024 3:46 PM