Love and activism in Wisconsin  | First Person | Advocate.com

||  First Person  ||
Love and activism in Wisconsin
Wisconsin couple Richard Taylor and Ray Vahey were coming up on their 50 years together when Taylor died in July. But in their last year together they not only decided to finally come out to family and friends but also joined a very public fight against a constitutional marriage ban on the November ballot.
By Ray Vahey
An Advocate.com exclusive posted September 15, 2006
Love and activism in Wisconsin

My husband, Richard Taylor, died in July just shy of our 50th anniversary on September 16. During our last year together, we finally found the courage and the strength to tell the world who we really were. And together we became activists, joining the gay rights group Fair Wisconsin in publicly opposing a proposed constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and civil unions that will appear on the November ballot in Wisconsin.

I met Richard Taylor (pictured above, right; I am on the left) in September 1956. We fell in love during my first solo vacation. Richard was managing a toy warehouse for a department store in Cleveland, and I had just graduated from high school in Youngstown, Ohio.

We first passed each other on Euclid Avenue in Cleveland, and my heart raced as I saw him in a black leather jacket, Levi's, and motorcycle boots. A few hours later we saw each other at the Greyhound Bus Station Post House. Soon we were on our way to my hotel. When we checked Richard into my room, the clerk offered to have a cot brought up, but I assured him we’d make out—and we certainly did.

It was the height of his busy season, so we spent our honeymoon in a 100-year-old warehouse. He set out work schedules for the following days and put me to work shooting price tags on Madame Alexander dolls. Those hours together were more romantic than a trip to any destination because they transported us to a special place of our own creation.

Over the years Richard always kept his indomitable spirit, his courage, his gentle and loving ways, and his joy for life—but ours was a necessarily secret place. We were living in a deeply homophobic era that in spite of some progress continues to this day.

Out of self-preservation we hid our feelings from family, friends, and above all, from our employers. We drew closer and closer over the years as we encountered the challenges and the ups and downs of life together. We saw each other as the most important person in the world, which made it easier to make choices and compromises that kept each other's hopes and well-being primary in our minds.

But living in the closet built walls of fear and misunderstanding between us and our families—walls that we only started to break down last year. Society had not progressed to the point that our families could understand and be accepting of us, and for 49 years we could not be frank—but out of caution and habit we were also tardy in giving some family and friends the chance to accept us.

Our parents and some of our siblings died without having known who were really were. If we had taken the chance to put our love on the table, we might have been so much closer to them over these many years.

Last year we came to see that no matter how deeply we were in the closet, the door is transparent, and folks who had their wits about them and knew us for a while were aware of us anyway. That lifted a great burden from our shoulders.

In 2005 we came out publicly and spoke of our love at Milwaukee’s PrideFest community rally. That was our epiphany. We began to speak to church groups and various organizations and testified at the Wisconsin state capitol in opposition to the proposed amendment that would ban civil unions and marriage for couples like us.

We knew that we were part of the Over the Hill Gang, and that more of our lives were behind us than ahead of us. But we vowed to each other that we would speak out against injustice for as long as each of us drew breath. Richard kept his promise, and I am going to do my best to keep mine. I would not change one moment of our lives, but this last year was the most glorious of them all because we were being open and because of our involvement in this effort.

Vahey is a communications consultant in Milwaukee

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.