CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
A group of Massachusetts lawmakers is trying to ban marriages between gay couples with an amendment to the Massachusetts constitution, a move that would trump any ruling by the state's high court allowing the unions. Massachusetts's supreme judicial court agreed Tuesday to consider an appeal of a ruling that the legislature, not the courts, should decide whether same-sex couples should be allowed to marry. House speaker Thomas M. Finneran, a Democrat, said Wednesday that if the court finds that gay couples have a legal right to marry, he would support an amendment specifically defining marriage as the union between a man and a woman. "I have voted, and would continue to vote, to restrict marriage to one man and one woman," Finneran told The Boston Globe. "The traditional definition and understanding of marriage is the definition that I'm most comfortable with." Democratic representative Philip Travis and 13 cosponsors filed a proposed amendment to the state constitution that would ban marriages for same-sex couples. A similar amendment was killed by the legislature last year through a procedural maneuver that avoided a vote. Travis said final decisions about marriage should be made through the democratic process and promised to bring his amendment up for a vote before the end of the legislative session, which runs through 2004. "The [state] supreme court is trying to rule on something that's up to the legislature and up to the people," he said. State constitutional amendments must advance through two consecutive legislative sessions and then must be approved by voters in a statewide election. Gay rights groups have vowed to fight the amendment, which Gary Buseck, executive director of Boston-based Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, said seems designed to influence the pending case before the state's high court.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
31 Period Films of Lesbians and Bi Women in Love That Will Take You Back
December 09 2024 1:00 PM
18 of the most batsh*t things N.C. Republican governor candidate Mark Robinson has said
October 30 2024 11:06 AM
True
These 15 major companies caved to the far right and stopped DEI programs
January 24 2025 1:11 PM
True
Latest Stories
Federal judge blocks Trump admin's gender-restrictive passport policy
April 18 2025 8:13 PM
Transgender teen can't legally change name until age 21, Mississippi Supreme Court rules
April 18 2025 4:51 PM
Military families sue Trump administration to keep their school system diverse
April 18 2025 2:40 PM
After backlash, Planned Parenthood Arizona resumes gender-affirming care
April 18 2025 2:28 PM
What does WorldPride's travel warning mean for transgender & nonbinary people?
April 18 2025 10:14 AM
Wilton Women’s Week 2025 ushers in a new era of LGBTQ+ empowerment in South Florida
April 18 2025 9:49 AM
Activists stack coffins in front of State Department to protest PEPFAR cuts (in photos)
April 17 2025 3:22 PM
JD Vance wants the UK to repeal its LGBTQ+ hate speech laws to secure a trade deal
April 17 2025 12:37 PM
Chicago Teachers Union ratifies groundbreaking contract cementing LGBTQ+ protections
April 17 2025 7:00 AM
Mahmoud v. Taylor: Everything to know about the Supreme Court case to ban LGBTQ+ books
April 17 2025 6:30 AM
Top 15 safest U.S. cities for LGBTQ+ travel
April 17 2025 6:02 AM