
CONTACT
Staff
CAREER OPPORTUNITIES
ADVERTISE WITH US
PRIVACY POLICY
PRIVACY PREFERENCES
TERMS OF USE
LEGAL NOTICE
© 2023 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
Don’t miss our latest news!
Sign up today for our free newsletter.
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use .
Oral arguments begin on Friday in a U.S. district court in San Francisco concerning a health benefits case challenging the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act.
Lambda Legal is arguing Golinski v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, which seeks to have health benefits extended to the wife of Karen Golinski, a San Francisco employee of the U.S. ninth circuit court of appeals. Back in January 2009, ninth circuit chief judge Alex Kozinski ruled it was illegal for Golinski to be denied spousal benefits, since the ninth circuit has a rule banning discrimination based on sexual orientation. The federal government's human resources department (the Office of Personnel Management) told Golinski's carrier, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, to not enforce the judge's order and the insurance company complied.
Judge Kozinski said in November 2009 that he had authority to interpret laws governing the rights of judicial employees and that not offering the benefits violated the ninth circuit court's guarantee of equal employment opportunity. Kozinski also argued that same-sex spouses were entitled to benefits under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan. But the next month, OPM said it would not offer benefits to Golinski's spouse, Amy Cunninghis, because Judge Kozinski was presiding over an administrative proceeding; OPM argued that he was not serving in his official capacity as a ninth circuit judge when he ordered the benefits be provided, but was presiding over an employee dispute. OPM, headed by gay Obama appointee John Berry, said it had final say in the matter and that it could not offer benefits to Cunninghis because of DOMA, which forbids federal recognition of state-sanctioned gay marriages.
Part of Lambda's argument against OPM in this case is that DOMA is unconstitutional, specifically because it discriminates based on sex and sexual orientation and it infringes on the right to privacy. Lambda is arguing that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas, which in 2003 overturned laws against sodomy, set a precedent for the federal government respecting one's familial relationships.
Lambda Legal also plans to tell district court judge Jeffrey White that he need not find DOMA unconstitutional to rule that Golinski's spouse is entitled to health insurance. "OPM, under the authority of President Obama, is part of the Executive Branch of the federal government, and lacks authority to override internal personnel decisions made by the Judicial Branch as it works to end discrimination against lesbian and gay court employees," says a press release from Lambda Legal.
"Different branches of government have different machinery for hiring and firing and the terms of employment," says Jennifer Pizer, Lambda Legal's senior counsel, who emphasized that OPM's maneuvering contradicted the ninth circuit's nondiscrimination policies. "One of the questions [of this case] is whether DOMA is unconstitutional or not, but the other existential question is whether we have one unitary federal government, or do we have separate entities?"
Nbroverman
Don't miss the untold
LGBTQ
+ stories of NEW HOPE, PA!
Five short documentaries that capture the diversity & rich history of its deeply rooted LGBTQ+ community.
QUEER CUTS: New Hope!
Watch it ON-DEMAND on the Advocate Channel App until November 15th.
Download our App for your mobile phone and your favorite streaming device!
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Lauren Boebert Caught Fondling Date’s Genitals During Family-Friendly Musical: Video
September 15 2023 11:20 PM
Don’t miss our latest news!
Sign up today for our free newsletter.
Watch Now: Advocate Channel
Trending Stories & News
For more news and videos on advocatechannel.com, click here.
Trending Stories & News
For more news and videos on advocatechannel.com, click here.
Latest Stories
Republicans Advocate Transphobic, Authoritarian ‘Project 2025’’ Even After Election Failures
November 11 2023 11:37 AM
Homophobic Colorado Web Designer Returns to Trial Court After Supreme Court Win
November 10 2023 6:12 PM
Watch Jamie Lee Curtis Tell Homophobes and Transphobes to 'Back the F*ck Off'
November 10 2023 3:18 PM
Transgender Man and Former Athlete Opens Up About What It Means to Be ‘A Real Man’
November 10 2023 1:30 PM
Republicans Try and Fail to Cut Karine Jean-Pierre's White House Salary to $1
November 10 2023 12:16 PM
After Pastor's Suicide, a Man Took to TikTok to Explain What It's Like to Be Outed
November 10 2023 12:06 PM
Trending stories
Most Recent
Recommended Stories for You
Neal Broverman
Neal Broverman is the Editorial Director, Print of Pride Media, publishers of The Advocate, Out, Out Traveler, and Plus, spending more than 20 years in journalism. He indulges his interest in transportation and urban planning with regular contributions to Los Angeles magazine, and his work has also appeared in the Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He lives in the City of Angels with his husband, children, and their chiweenie.
Neal Broverman is the Editorial Director, Print of Pride Media, publishers of The Advocate, Out, Out Traveler, and Plus, spending more than 20 years in journalism. He indulges his interest in transportation and urban planning with regular contributions to Los Angeles magazine, and his work has also appeared in the Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He lives in the City of Angels with his husband, children, and their chiweenie.