Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Rising anti-LGBTQ+ censorship efforts pull directly from the playbooks of modern authoritarian leaders

As Congress advances anti-LGBTQ+ legislation and states expand restrictions on queer and trans visibility, PEN America experts warn the tactics increasingly resemble those used by modern authoritarian governments.

A display of LGBTQ+ books at a California bookstore

A display of LGBTQ+ books at a California bookstore

Michael Barajas/Shutterstock

Across the U.S., a campaign to seclude and suppress queer and trans lives from public visibility is continuing to spread. In public schools, libraries, universities, art galleries, museums, government websites, and national monuments, we are seeing art, books, terms, and symbols of LGBTQ+ identity disappear at a quickening pace.

We don’t need to wonder where this is coming from or where it’s going. Wielding state power against LGBTQ+ communities has been a hallmark of authoritarian regimes.


In Nazi Germany, LGBTQ+ culture and literature was purged as “un-German.” More recently in Putin’s Russia and Orban’s Hungary, officials have claimed children need “protection” from LGBTQ+ “propaganda,” rhetoric used to justify not only strict controls on LGBTQ+ topics in schools and universities, but also restrictions on museum exhibitions and across media, film, books and advertisements.

This didn't begin with Trump’s re-election, but the current administration is applying the playbook well, declaring in executive orders that “gender ideology” is “anti-American,” and that the government needs to protect children from what they claim is “indoctrination,” – including the basic fact that queer and trans people exist. In Congress, there is now not one, but three bills gaining traction that would implement anti-LGBTQ+ restrictions on certain federal education funds.

As with Florida’s 2022 “Don’t Say Gay” law that clearly echoes Russia’s 2013 law prohibiting showing “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations” to minors, this trio of Congressional bills (H.R. 2616, H.R. 8705, and H.R. 7661) each seeks to weaponize funding to prevent schools teaching about made-up terms, largely pulled from Trump executive orders: “gender ideology,” “transgenderism,” “divisive equity ideology,” and “sexually oriented material.” Censors often resort to vague language like this, but the intention behind it is clear: to exclude trans and queer representation in schools. All three bills have already made it past committee, and just last month, H.R. 2616, alarmingly, passed the House with a combination of votes from Republicans and several Democrats.

Authoritarians target public schools because they are a convenient site for advancing mass cultural change, a place where the government can have the most impact on what young people are allowed to learn and think. It’s an unsettling point, but if the goal is to enact an extreme agenda to enforce a homogenous national identity, schools are a good bet to mold minds.

Despite the Supreme Court’s adage that “no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion,” we have seen government officials use their offices to do just that, bypassing the First Amendment and passing laws and policies to exclude and erase LGBTQ+ identities from our institutions.

The work of remaking popular culture through official state repression cannot be accomplished overnight. That’s why the campaign to purge LGBTQ+ expression is continuing to evolve, from banning books to prohibiting music, from closing DEI offices to defunding research on LGBTQ+ public health, to dismantling gender studies as an academic field. Texas Tech university has recently moved to prohibit any teaching or student research projects that “center on” gender or sexuality whatsoever. And we are seeing public library funding threatened in more communities over books with trans or queer representation. The current FCC has taken up the cause too, recently announcing it was weighing adding viewer warnings to alert parents to any “transgender or nonbinary programming.”

These censorship tactics are moving from classrooms to campuses and from libraries to living rooms with increasing ease, because the ideologues behind this will not be satisfied until their project of suppression is complete.

This aggressive campaign has not yet led to what we’ve seen in other authoritarian regimes –a ban on pride celebrations, prohibition of LGBTQ+ people on primetime TV, government fines for retailers selling books like Heartstopper or websites streaming shows like Heated Rivalry. But anti-LGBTQ+ policy never ends at censorship alone. Though vetoed, Hungary passed a law in 2023 that would have allowed citizens to report same-sex families and trans-affirming parents; and Russia continues to arrest and prosecute people for so much as having a rainbow pride flag on display or publishing LGBTQ+ books. In Germany, where they burned books, they later burned people.

In the U.S. we are now in danger of repeating that pattern, as progress made for LGBTQ+ rights in the decades since the “Lavender Scare” of the 1950s and the height of the AIDS epidemic is being reversed. Already at the state level, prohibitions on gender-affirming care and a law revoking state IDs for trans people have been enacted, and a number of state lawmakers are campaigning to end marriage equality.

For the LGBTQ+ community, the message from these actions is clear: we are not supposed to live authentically nor be seen or heard in public life. With our educational and cultural institutions running full steam ahead with our erasure, we know that without serious intervention, things will not stop there.

Jonathan Friedman oversees PEN America's U.S. efforts to protect free expression, including the freedom to write, read, and learn. Madison Markham is program coordinator for PEN America's Freedom to Read program, which works to combat book bans and censorship in schools and libraries.


Opinion is dedicated to featuring a wide range of inspiring personal stories and impactful opinions from the LGBTQ+ community and its allies. Visit Advocate.com/submit to learn more about submission guidelines. We welcome your thoughts and feedback on any of our stories. Email us at voices@equalpride.com. Views expressed in Voices stories are those of the guest writers, columnists, and editors, and do not directly represent the views of The Advocate or our parent company, equalpride.

FROM OUR SPONSORS

More For You