|| PROPOSITION 8 ||
1 2 3 NEXT  Page 1 of 3

Story Updated : 7/23/2009 3:56:44 AM

Gay Is the New Black?



The following is the cover story from the December 16 issue of The Advocate. Selected stories from that issue will be posted November 19 on Advocate.com; subscribers will receive the issue the following week. Accompanying Michael Joseph Gross's piece are photos taken November 12 at New York City's rally against the passage of Proposition 8 in California, which rescinded the right of same-sex couples to marry.For more coverage of the New York rally, click here. Top Photo: Gregory Gillbergh

The night before Election Day, a black woman walked into the San Francisco headquarters of the No on Proposition 8 campaign. Someone had ripped down the No on 8 sign she’d posted in her yard and she wanted a replacement. She was old, limping, and carrying a cane. Walking up and down the stairs to this office was hard for her.

I asked why coming to get the sign was worth the trouble, and she answered, “All of us are equal, and all of us have to fight to make sure the law says that.” She said that she was straight, and she told me about one of the first times she ever hung out with gay people, in New Orleans in the 1970s. “I thought I was so cool for being there, and I said, ‘You faggots are a lot of fun!’ Well, that day I learned my lesson. A gay man turned on me and said, ‘A faggot is not a person. A faggot is a bunch of sticks you use to light a fire.’ ”

The next day, Barack Obama was elected president, and gay marriage rights in California were taken away. At the same time, Arizona voters amended their state constitution to preemptively outlaw gay marriage. Florida went further, outlawing any legal union that’s treated as marriage, such as domestic partnerships or civil unions. Arkansas passed a vicious law denying us adoption rights.

NY Prop 8 Rally 05 X390 (Jon Barrett) | Advocate.com The combination of Obama’s win and gay people’s losses inflicted mass whiplash. We were elated, then furious. I’d spent the week in the No on Prop. 8 office in the Castro, a neighborhood where our defeat was existential. For the next few days, wherever I went -- barbershop, grocery store, gym, bars -- I heard people talk of almost nothing else. Incredibly, strangers on the street walked up to me and started conversations about Prop. 8. Taking the long view, some found hope and consolation: 52.3% of Californians voted against us, but 47.7% voted with us, which was the closest we’ve ever come to winning a ballot measure for marriage equality in the state. Other election results were even more encouraging: In New York State, where a marriage bill is pending, we won enough legislative seats to secure a pro-equality majority; Connecticut voters rejected a constitutional convention that could have reversed that state’s legalization of marriage.

Still, the election was a blindsiding reminder that the majority of voters, even in a state as liberal as California, still see gay people as second-class citizens. These past few years we’ve made so much progress that we’d begun to think everybody saw us as we see ourselves. Suddenly we were faced with the reality that a majority of voters don’t like us, don’t think we're normal, don’t believe our lives and loves count as much or are worth as much as theirs.

History compounds the insult and suggests hypothetical scenarios rendering the mixed result of this election even more absurd. If the California supreme court and the U.S. Supreme Court decisions overturning antimiscegenation laws -- Perez v. Sharp and Loving v. Virginia -- had been blocked by popular vote, Barack Obama might never have been born. His parents would not have been able to marry in several states (although Hawaii, where they were married, had never enacted a law against interracial marriage).

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. 1 2 3 NEXT  Page 1 of 3
Reader Comments
  • Name: Clayton
    Date posted: 8/14/2009 5:34:00 PM
    Hometown: Canada

    Comment:

    what's problematic about this article is that it only seems to targets black people. Why not target white women who voted yes. White women did not get to vote in the states until 1920 and had to fight for equal rights, why not target hispanics who represented a higher proportion of voters in prop 8 and a majority voted yes. What about other minority groups for the way they voted. By only talking about black voters the article dminishes the role that all the voters played in this vote. It insinuates that black people owe gays something. While the author tiptoed around the issue in the article....it started off wrong by focusing on one group of people and not valuing the uniqueness of each struggle. Shame on the Advocate for creating division to get publicity!

  • Name: Matt
    Date posted: 7/27/2009 1:38:00 PM
    Hometown: Grand Rapids, MI

    Comment:

    The title is clearly offensive - but I think prudent people can agree that the parallels are the fight against discrimination and equal rights under the law.... I think its proper to compare in that context. In the context of degree of hardship, obviously the African American hardship and LGBT hardship ought not be compared. However - we should stop fighting to be the biggest victims, rather come together as common victims and overcome.

  • Name: Shekia
    Date posted: 5/25/2009 9:28:00 AM
    Hometown: TX

    Comment:

    Simply put...Being Black is a skin color, never changing. Being Gay is who you want to have sex with. The two cannot and should not be compared. Gay people were not brought to a new country on ships, taken away from their homes, severely beaten by their Masters, etc. Black people built this very country all of the important National buildings were built on the blood, sweat and tears of slaves. Gay people have NEVER been told that they would be segregated from schools, or even had the National Guard escort them into a school for protection. Gay people have NEVER had police beat them with billyclubs, have police dogs attack them, just so that they can eat in the same places, have the same education, vote, etc. just like anyone else. I am sick and tired of this talk. Black people have had to work very hard and fight for the rights that we have received. And if anyone tells me that there is still not racism out there, I will SCREAM!

  • Name: Jamal
    Date posted: 5/21/2009 4:32:00 PM
    Hometown: Pomona, California

    Comment:

    First of all I am very offended by the title. I really don't care if gays get married. But the whole idea of prop 8 was to teach about gay marriages in schools. Second how can you dare compare your self to a black man as my self. We have been hated and treated like second class citizens our whole life. For years in history black people were killed, hung, beaten and in slaved for years. Black people have had no real rights since 1968 and even then we were still treated different. But oh gays have a little struggle getting rights and they decide to compare them selves to blacks. Blacks have fought and fought for over 500 years just to have equal rights as are fellow Americans.

  • Name: Jamal
    Date posted: 5/21/2009 4:28:00 PM
    Hometown: Pomona, California

    Comment:

    First of all I am very offended by the title. I really don't care if gays get married. But the whole idea of prop 8 was to teach about gay marriages in schools. Second how can you dare compare your self to a black man as my self. We have been hated and treated like second class citizens our whole life. For years in history black people were killed, hung, beaten and in slaved for years. Black people have had no real rights since 1968 and even then we were still treated different. But oh gays have a little struggle getting rights and they decide to compare them selves to blacks. Blacks have fought and fought for over 500 years just to have equal rights as are fellow Americans.

  • Name: eddie
    Date posted: 5/16/2009 5:59:00 PM
    Hometown: oc

    Comment:

    I was so offended with the cover of this issue. Mostly, I don't take The Advocate magazine too seriously, but this "Gay Is The New Black: The Last Civil Rights Struggle" was symbolic of the divisiveness between the gay community. You're never going to win any marriage-equality victories in California or in any other multicultural, diverse state if the White queer leadership of this country fails to include African Americans and other people of color in this struggle. While the struggle acknowledges the differences between both movements (gay rights and civil rights), it struggled to link commonalities to justify that ridiculous cover. Wake up, Advocate. This movement has a long way to go...

  • Name: Jackson Bing
    Date posted: 5/7/2009 12:56:00 PM
    Hometown: Brooklyn

    Comment:

    It's ironic but typical that when it suits the WASP gay agenda, it falls back to comparing inequalities based on sexuality to the black civl rights struggle. The Advocate, as anyone with eyes knows, never has an article or even any ads featuring black gay men or women. The only time you see a black face in any gay publication is in reference to an HIV medication. Otherwise, blacks are invisible in the alleged gay "community." The fact remains that WASP gays are some of the most passively racist individuals, either arbitrarily rejecting black inclusiveness in the gay world or objectifiying them as sexual fetishism.

  • Name: Marilyn
    Date posted: 4/5/2009 5:31:00 PM
    Hometown: Oakland CA

    Comment:

    This cover is problematic in so many ways but I will focus only on one issue. When you pose the questions "Is Gay the New Black" it renders Black Gay people invisible. Why talk about the categories as if they are mutually exclusive. It isn't as if there are no Gay Black people, we exist! We need to complicate this oversimplification of the issue. It just goes to show how much more work the Gay rights movement has to do in regards to it's racism. Annoying but not surprising.

  • Name: Jil
    Date posted: 1/29/2009 11:34:00 PM
    Hometown: Oakland

    Comment:

    No matter how you slice it, quote it or read it- This cover, article, argument, premise, comparison is wrong wrong wrong. And always will be. Male privilege? White skin privilege? WTF? Are you really serious? As a light skinned black gay woman who can pass for straight- i will say it again. This article is reckless and irresponsible and wrong wrong wrong. Shame on you Advocate. Shame. On. You.

  • Name: Jil
    Date posted: 1/29/2009 11:32:00 PM
    Hometown: Oakland

    Comment:

    No matter how you slice it, quote it or read it- This cover, article, argument, premise, comparison is wrong wrong wrong. And always will be. Male privilege? White skin privilege? WTF? Are you really serious? As a light skinned black gay woman who can pass for straight- i will say it again. This article is reckless and irresponsible and wrong wrong wrong. Shame on you Advocate. Shame. On. You.

 PREVIOUS 1 2 3 4 5  ... NEXT  


 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity