Howard Dean says he's sorry

In an exclusive interview with The Advocate, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee says that his mistake on The 700 Club should not blind LGBT voters to his party’s ongoing, hands-on work for equality. Does he support marriage equality himself? Sort of.

By Bruce C. Steele

An Advocate.com exclusive posted May 17, 2006

Howard Dean screwed up, and he’s sorry. Appearing May 10 on the Christian Broadcasting Network talk show The 700 Club—antigay preacher Pat Robertson’s home base—the chairman of the Democratic National Committee misstated his party’s platform on marriage equality. “The Democratic Party platform from 2004 says that marriage is between a man and a woman,” he said. In fact the platform calls for “full inclusion of gay and lesbian families” and says the definition of marriage should be left up to the states.

Speaking to The Advocate by telephone six days later, the former Vermont governor—who signed into law the nation’s first marriage-like civil unions law covering same-sex couples—said simply, “I made a mistake, and it was a bad mistake.” But having won unprecedented LGBT support in his home state and in his 2003 campaign for president, Dean added, “I would hope one misstatement is not going to destroy the relationship that I’ve had with the LGBT community over the past four or five years.” [See the full interview below.]

But the 700 Club incident wasn’t the first bad press the DNC got in the gay media in 2006. In February the Washington Blade reported that the party had, months earlier, abolished all constituent outreach desks—including the staff responsible for LGBT voters—replacing minority-specific outreach efforts with a new program called the American Majority Partnership. Democratic Party fund-raiser Jeff Soref resigned from the DNC in protest, telling the Blade gays were being “remarginalized” in the party.

That same month, a six-page Annual Report to the Grassroots issued by the DNC failed to include any mention of LGBT issues or voters. The party quickly issued a clarification underlining its support for LGBT equality and distancing itself from the apparently unofficial and incomplete “report.” As if that wasn’t enough, the DNC was back in the news in May, when Dean fired the party’s gay outreach adviser, Donald Hitchcock, shortly after Hitchcock’s partner, Paul Yandura, had sent out an e-mail critical of the party. Yandura’s April 20 “open letter” accused the Democratic Party of refusing to battle antigay statewide initiatives, such as state constitutional amendments to outlaw marriage equality, and suggested LGBT people withhold donations from the party.

The DNC immediately hired Brian Bond to replace Hitchcock, and a spokeswoman said that Hitchcock’s firing was “not retaliation.”

A week later came Dean’s gaff on The 700 Club.

At a time when your opponents have perfected the art of mobilizing their base to win close elections, what’s the chairman of the DNC doing on The 700 Club?
We’re also trying to mobilize our base. We have people in all 50 states knocking on doors, and we’re doing specific [organizing] with the LGBT community for the first time. We’re paying for these organizers in every state—there’s 200 of them around the country—and when we train them, among all the other things they have to [learn], specifically, is how to empower our friends and family in the LGBT community. We talk to them about how to talk about LGBT issues, with the straight community and with the LGBT community. We also have an arrangement with Stonewall Democrats—they were very active in our million-household canvass two weeks ago. We’re really trying to integrate the LGBT community so they don’t just talk to each other, they also speak to the straight community—because ultimately, I think, that’s how we’re going to start converting folks to understand that gay Americans are Americans first, who happen to be gay.

But while it’s good to hear that the DNC is doing grass-roots organizing on gay issues that we haven’t necessarily heard about, what we see on the news is you on The 700 Club. Gay voters supported your presidential campaign [in 2003 and early 2004] because they saw you as cutting through the bullshit and speaking your mind. Now you appear to be pandering to the antigay far right. Why should gay voters trust you with their issues when you’re on The 700 Club?
Well, to be honest with you, I was hurt a little bit by the reaction, because I certainly made a mistake in misstating the party’s platform.

How did that happen?
Because that was the position that the presidential candidate had in the last election—I just assumed that that was the party platform, and it wasn’t. I just made a mistake, and it was a bad mistake, but if you look at what else I said on [the Christian Broadcasting Network]—and it’s not the last time I’m going to go on CBN—I went on and I said gay people need to be included. We stand up for equal rights for every American and the belief that everybody deserves to live with dignity and respect. That wasn’t sent around in all those e-mails, but that was part of the transcript too. Look, I don’t defend the mistake I made—I made a mistake and I misstated the party’s platform, but I also stood up for gay and lesbian Americans on that show. Look, with my history, there’s no way I’m going to back away from the LGBT community.

But then why eliminate all discussion of gay issues and gay voters from the DNC’s Grassroots Report, which came out earlier this year?
To be honest with you, I don’t know what the Grassroots Report is, I’m embarrassed to say. [DNC spokesman Damien LaVera explained after this interview that the so-called Grassroots Report was not an official DNC publication but a fund-raising e-mail on which Governor Dean had no input. The e-mail also failed to mention outreach to African-American voters, LaVera noted.]

When we all know that privately, many Democratic politicians support marriage equality, why can’t the Democratic Party take a firm stand on equality?
Well, I think we do take a firm stand on equality; there’s no question about that.

But not for marriage equality.
Well, the question is how we get to equality under the law for all Americans, and I think the Democratic Party has provided that [plan]. It’s obviously a difficult debate, but there’s no backing away from equal rights under the law for all Americans, including gay and lesbian Americans. The question is how do you get there, and I think that’s what’s still being debated.

Do you personally support marriage equality for same-sex couples?
I’ve never answered that question. What I have said is that I support equal rights under the law for every single American.

That sounds like you want to say you’re in favor of marriage equality without saying you’re in favor of marriage equality.
You know, I represent a party that has a very broad constituency. I think there are people who are committed to equal rights under the law but don’t think you have to have [same-sex] marriage in order to do it, and there are people who think you have to have marriage. I’m not a candidate at this point; all I can do is say is that we’re going to continue to work really hard for equal rights under the law, and we’re going to continue to work really hard to kill nasty approaches and divisive approaches like the marriage amendment [which would write antigay marriage discrimination into the U.S. Constitution and has been scheduled for an early-June vote in the U.S. Senate by Majority Leader Bill Frist]. We do not support amendments to the United States Constitution that scapegoat communities.

Why do you think it makes news when someone like Sen. Russ Feingold comes out in favor of marriage equality? Why aren’t more Democratic politicians who privately favor marriage equality putting that into their campaigns and platforms?
Because I think it’s extremely controversial, and we need to work through that controversy. There’s a lot of education that has to be done, and that’s why we decided to ask Stonewall [Democrats] to help us with the [50-state] canvass. It’s why we got rid of the so-called gay desk and all the other desks, because we wanted to integrate folks into our approach to mainstream voters. We don’t want to pigeonhole, for example, gay staff or black staff or Hispanic staff or anybody else anymore. We want to have an outreach [effort] that emphasizes the diversity of our party. My guess is, we have more LGBT staffers at the DNC now than we’ve ever had before. Those folks can do a lot more than just do LGBT outreach, but each time they represent themselves as openly gay or lesbian to an American who happens to be straight, that American finds a human being who’s a competent, qualified person who happens to be gay, and that kicks the ball down the court in terms of equal rights under the law.

Coming out is always a political act, I agree. But it’s a very private one. I think gay and lesbian voters are looking for the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates to take a firm public stand on issues of equality: on overturning the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, on support for gay youth, on rights for gay parents, on scrapping abstinence programs in favor of real AIDS prevention education. Why can’t Democratic candidates stand up and say very firmly that these things need to be addressed?
I’m happy to do that. When I was running for president, I did that. Don’t forget, I’m still on record as opposing [the federal] DOMA [signed by President Clinton] and thinking that “don’t ask, don’t tell” ought to be eliminated. I still publicly make fun of the Bush administration for kicking out Arab translators because they happened to be gay. I’m with you on all these issues. I think it’s very important—I have to underline this—that the LGBT community and the Democratic Party not get divided over the one issue that we’re still having a big conversation about, which is the conversation about marriage equality. Because all the other things, certainly, the chairman of the DNC is with you on. And many Democrats are with you on. Maybe not all; maybe not as many as we think should [be]. But I am with you on “don’t ask, don’t tell”; I am with you on adoption rights; I am with you on DOMA. I’m not perfect, but I think when you compare us to the other side, we’re pretty close.

Story continues on next page...

Page: 1 | 2

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

Error:Server capacity reached.

Error:Server capacity reached.