
Even though at least two other members of Congress have dallied with pages in the past (Democratic representative Gerry Studds of Massachusetts, with a male page in 1973, and Republican representative Dan Crane of Illinois, with a female page circa 1983), Mark Foley's current scandal and admission of being gay seem to have set the D.C. closet on fire.
One of the few out politicians on Capitol Hill, Massachusetts congressman Barney Frank (who survived his own scandal involving a male prostitute in 1989) gives us his take on Foley and on being a gay politician in Washington.
What do you think will be the political fallout of
the Foley scandal?
This makes it very, very likely the Democrats
will win the House back in November. It's easy to
punish a party when it's not the presidency itself.
Was it common knowledge in Washington that Foley
was gay?
Both sides of the aisle knew; it was an open secret.
Foley would get people in Florida thinking he was out
up north, but that was not the case. Once, at a
congressional Christmas party at the White House, my
ex-boyfriend Herb went up to Foley, who was with a female
date, and said to him, "Why don't you get a real
date?" Foley didn't say anything.
It's funny how a lot of gay male politicians in Washington came with male dates to these events during the Clinton years, but then showed up with females under Bush.
What do you think was the role of gay Republicans
in all this?
Apparently, Kirk Fordham, Foley's ex–chief of
staff and Rep. Thomas Reynolds's chief of staff, is a
very active gay Republican [and] also had some role in
the hush-up. [As of Wednesday, Fordham is no longer on
Reynolds's staff.] There are others who were involved that I
can't mention since they aren't out. They are all more
like secret Jews.
How do the gay Republicans reconcile their consciences?
A lot of them chose between their gayness and their
party. I'm sure the group of gay Republican staffers
hid Foley's actions as best they could.
This is a real crisis, since before, gays in the Republican Party were willing to be tolerated, but Republicans will now be more nervous having gay people in positions of power. They have been critical of people who are out and gay—there could be a real purge of gays in the Republican Party now. It's probably just enough for people to be perceived to be gay.
Do you think the media has unfairly exploited the
gay angle to the scandal?
Newt Gingrich said the Republicans couldn't have
publicly reprimanded Foley or they would be accused of
gay-bashing. That's just gibberish. There would
probably be just as much uproar if it was an underage
female, because of Foley's work with children. In
fact, I think the media has been fairly good about not
gay-bashing this scandal.
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.