Continental promo
< Back Comments (0)Post a Comment Bookmark and Share   Page: 1 | 2
 

Glass on glass

In an interview with Advocate.com, This American Life's handsome host, Ira Glass, defends his decision to bring his radio show to TV, reveals his favorite This American Life stories, and admits how living with the gym bunnies of Chelsea seriously messes with his self-esteem.
An Advocate.com exclusive posted April 9, 2007
Glass on glass

With its folksy, funny, and sometimes heartbreaking vignettes of everyday existence, radio program This American Life—produced by Chicago Public Radio and widely heard on National Public Radio—has captivated listeners for over a decade. Now host Ira Glass brings the program to Showtime, and talks to The Advocate about everything from crazed fans to Tyra Banks.

 

Hey, Ira. I just saw the whole series and I loved it.
Oh, thank you.

How much self-analyzing went into bringing the radio show to TV? Was there a lot of inner turmoil?
[The This American Life staff and I] believed it would be impossible to do more self-analyzing than we did. I feel like the staff and I took it as far as we could possibly go because there was a long period where Showtime was asking us to do [the TV show] and we simply weren't sure it could be done at all. Once we started working on the pilot, there was the incredibly horrible process of figuring out the aesthetic of this thing we were inventing. In the beginning we talked about doing a lot of animation and a lot of fancy stuff, but in the end we felt like that stuff wasn't as expressive for what we wanted to do. In the end you want to come to solutions that are simple.

Do you have a stock response that you keep handy for the people who think you sold out by bringing This American Life to TV?
I really need one, don't I? I mean, people aren't saying to me, "You sold out." It's more like people, the fans of ours, don't understand. It's total incomprehension. It doesn't go as far as selling out. Sometimes there's a feeling of betrayal because I think there are still people who view anything to do with television as just being bad. I feel that's a little out of date, truthfully. Television has gotten so much better in the last 10 years. But I think that still, for many people, if it's television, that means it's a force of evil. So when I'm getting this incredibly skeptical response from our own fans, the thing I've been saying is that we did this because we thought we could make a nice show. We didn't do [the TV show] wanting to do anything different. We thought we could make a show that has exactly the feeling and the values of our radio show. And it seemed worth trying.

So no nefarious reasons.
There's no dignity in saying this, but the radio show had been on the air for over a decade, and it just seemed like it would be fun to try something new. It wasn't more complicated than that. We knew that we weren't going to stop making the radio show, and it just seemed like, well, we have this TV network that wants to throw all this money not at us but at this project. When do you get a chance like that? When we were doing the pilot, we got all sorts of guarantees from the network, like if we did the pilot and we found that the things they needed for it to be a TV show were simply things we didn't agree with, we could kill the whole project.

That's a lot of control.
In the end, they basically said, if we were going to be unhappy with it, chances are they were going to be unhappy with it too.

Do you believe the TV show packs the same punch as the radio show?
If I didn't think that, we wouldn't be doing it. The thing I would say to the radio listeners is, just look at the preview online. I feel like once people see that stuff they feel much more confident. We just did this six-city tour, and I would say to the audience, "Were you worried when you heard we were doing a TV show?" In every city they roared back, "Yes!" In Minnesota a guy yelled out, "Judas!"

The people in them all start out a little silly, but by the end you've give them credence and the audience is no longer judging them. How do you manage to tell the stories without being condescending? Is it in the stories you choose?
I don't think it's the stories we choose as much as it is our general sense of aesthetics. I don't think it's that interesting to laugh at people. Stories are more interesting if you're empathizing. As soon as you start empathizing, basically you've opened up the entire world of feelings that are possible to have as a person. If you're laughing at somebody, that's a feeling, but it's a very finite feeling. I don't knock reality shows. I watch those shows. I just feel like it's human drama, and it's interesting, but that's not our way.

I don't think people would be screaming "Judas" if there was a Temptation Island 3 .
Even with a pretty good show like Project Runway there's a certain amount of laughing at a certain character because they're just an ass. Runway gets great when there is someone you really love and you want to win. Of course you feel this about Tim Gunn.

Page: 1 | 2
Broverman is associate editor of The Advocate.

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.
  • Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
    When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.
  • Hungry Like the Wolf
    A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.
  • Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
    Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.
  • The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
    With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.
  • Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
    After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.
  • The Pride of Antwerp
    Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.
  • Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
    In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.
  • Top Political Blogs
    From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.
  • The Diva of French Television
    A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.