
There was a time not too long ago when a typical evening in Mike Oberg and Gregg Valdez’s home involved a quiet family meal in the kitchen of their comfortable residence in Salem, Utah. During the meal they’d chat about their day and ask Little Mike, Valdez’s 13-year-old son, about school or skateboarding; if Valdez’s 17-year-old daughter wasn’t out with friends, she might join them at the table.
But that quiet evening ritual changed when Valdez’s niece, Antoinette Rudman, 34, had a drug relapse in mid September and called her uncle on a Friday afternoon to ask if he’d temporarily take care of her four young children. Valdez, who works as a case manager at a local prison, immediately jumped in his car to pick them up.
Though the family still gathers for dinner every evening, now there’s an excited energy at the table as the older kids chat and squabble. After dinner, the couple, who have been together for more than four years, spend most of the evening prodding the children to do their homework and to take their baths. Though Valdez calls the experience a “fun challenge,” he also wryly notes that “it’s not quiet anymore. And there aren’t leftovers anymore.”
In most states and in most cases, the agreement Rudman had made with Valdez about the care of her children wouldn’t merit much attention, since the person that a parent chooses as a temporary guardian is a private matter. But an assistant attorney general representing the state’s Division of Child and Family Services has argued that because Rudman was being monitored by the state for drug use, the arrangement violates a Utah state law that prohibits those cohabitating in a sexual relationship from becoming foster or adoptive parents -- a law that some critics say was designed to target gay and lesbian couples.
Following the legal challenge, the children have been allowed to remain in Valdez’s custody only because of an emergency court order; a hearing scheduled for October 29 will determine whether the children will be returned to their mother, will stay with Valdez or other relatives, or will be placed elsewhere.
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.