Health Promo 03 (Getty) | Advocate.com
||  Election 2008  ||
 

McCain Slyly Refers to Gays in GOP Acceptance Speech

For anyone still wondering, on the left or the right, where John McCain now stands on two of the most divisive social issues of our time -- abortion and gay rights -- the Arizona senator made his beliefs clear as he accepted the Republican Party's nomination for president Thursday night in St. Paul, Minnesota.
An Advocate.com exclusive posted September 5, 2008
McCain Slyly Refers to Gays in GOP Acceptance Speech

For anyone still wondering, on the left or the right, where John McCain now stands on two of the most divisive social issues of our time -- abortion and gay rights -- the Arizona senator made his beliefs clear as he accepted the Republican Party's nomination for president Thursday night in St. Paul, Minnesota. Before a hall of enthralled Republicans at the Xcel Energy Center here, he declared his support for a "culture of life" -- and judges "who dispense justice impartially and don't legislate from the bench." The latter reference, though coded in language about an "activist" judiciary, was an obvious swipe at same-sex marriage, in a year when the California Supreme Court ruled in favor of marriage equality (and when that state and two others, including McCain's home state, face ballot initiatives over the issue).

Pundits had speculated whether the Republican nominee would directly address the conservative base in his speech capping his party's 2008 convention, even though his running mate, Alaska governor Sarah Palin, had sufficiently energized evangelicals (and gun owners) in the heady days before. But his campaign clearly wagered that McCain needed to bolster his critics once more, and that he did, albeit it in a veiled way -- the better to not dissuade the swing voters who will determine this election two months from now.

The references came in a town-hall-style talk that was heavy on the former POW's biography, exploited all week long by convention speakers in an effort to prove that McCain, and not Democratic nominee Barack Obama, had the experience and resolve to lead America at a time of numerous geopolitical threats. And while McCain also emphasized his "maverick" reputation in taking on his own party during his career in Congress -- and his commitment to bipartisanship in getting things done there -- his jabs at supporters of abortion rights and gay rights showed that the man who once defiantly denounced religious "agents of intolerance" is no longer the independent thinker on the issues that social conservatives feel most strongly about.

Gays and lesbians watching the speech may have noted one other statement that could be interpreted as divisive: that education is "the civil-rights issue of this century." While McCain was specifically referring to the differing levels of "access" that white students and their black and Latino peers have to quality schools, members of the LGBT community would be forgiven for thinking that their struggle for equal rights was of paramount concern.

McCain's speech, complete with several diversions by protesters -- including a man two tiers above a media work section bearing a sign that said YOU CAN'T WIN AN OCCUPATION -- was an anomaly in a week that featured little outright criticism of gay marriage from convention speakers, in marked contrast to the Republicans' 2004 convention, when the Federal Marriage Amendment was frequently (and strategically) cited. Indeed, except for a remark by McCain's former rival Mike Huckabee about not changing "the very definition of marriage from what it has always meant throughout recorded human history," there was an utter lack of explicit rhetoric on gay issues -- contrary to the strong statements of support heard at the Democratic convention in Denver last week.

Sure, high-level McCain campaign staffers like national political director Mike DuHaime and senior strategist Steve Schmidt addressed the Log Cabin Republicans this week, but it was hard to square their outreach with the GOP's overall silence when it comes to LGBT people. McCain is known for gambles, but only Election Day will tell whether his and his party's strict avoidance of the same voters Obama's campaign is assiduously courting will pay off.

Kennedy is the news & features editor of The Advocate.
Keywords:  2008 Election  John McCain 

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: David
    Date posted: 2008-09-09 5:29 AM
    Hometown: Phoenix AZ

    Comment:

    Both parties do not have the answers we want to hear., However I believe if we all unite and vote for Obama, we can continue to fight for our rights, without having to worry about McCain taking us a step back instead of forward. I love my country but equal rights is a load of BS! We're not treated equally, I don't undertand how neither one Obama/McCain can enforce their true power and support those citizens that have never been truely recognized as equal!


  • Name: Donovan
    Date posted: 2008-09-08 4:41 PM
    Hometown: Lake City, MN

    Comment:

    I'm a 40 year old gay man and voted Democrat my entire life. After reading this article, I'm appalled at how biased it is. We've all felt discrminated against. How can you exclude the Republican faction of our commnunity? We strive for acceptance. Apparently you don't accept those whose views differ from yours. Show both sides so we can make our own decisions. Be fair! If you're going to qoute a speech , review the WHOLE speech for an informed response. McCain was talking about judges giving terrorists the right to a trial. He stated that. You can't take pieces and make them into what fits your views. Come on, we're all adults. This is a time to unite not divide. A time to inform. Don't exploit us by using on us the same hatred and bias we've experienced for generations. I've subscribed to The Advocate for many years. I will not be renewing nor will I support this magazine any longer and that saddens me.


  • Name: Peter Barnard
    Date posted: 2008-09-08 9:48 AM
    Hometown: St. Paul, MN/Bennington, VT

    Comment:

    Someone MIGHT want to remind the religious right that the Roman Empire married gays during the height of the Pax Romana (Homophobia: A History). They might also want to refer to how the "institution of marriage" has changed in the last 200 years from one of ownership to mutuality and from being single ethnic/religious to being quite thoroughly mixed (my own jewish/catholic parents who are middle eastern/Scandinavian).


  • Name: Hedron
    Date posted: 2008-09-08 2:46 AM
    Hometown: Orlando, FL

    Comment:

    Half of the candidates in the Florida primary last month were Republicans running as Democrats. The Republicans are so desparate to take over everything, and so disgusted with the failure of the last 8 years that they are infiltrating the Democratic party to make it moot and useless. Be careful for whom you vote this and in future years.


  • Name: Scott
    Date posted: 2008-09-07 7:29 PM
    Hometown: Wichita, KS

    Comment:

    With the great "Decider" in the White House, we forgot basic civics about the three equal branches of Federal government and the immense authority granted to the States. Congress legislates and confirms appointees and treaties. The Judicial branch insures we follow the Constitution. The President executes the laws of the land, vetoes bills in which he disagrees, appoints judges, is head of state, commander-in-chief, and chief executive of government departments. If the Constitution doesn’t spell it out, it is a State responsibility. Obama, a constitutional scholar, is ideologically aligned with the Constitution not his voter base. He doesn’t support gay marriage, but won't sign any law outlawing it, and refers it to the States. Repealing "don't ask, don't tell," and giving all government employees equal rights is about all the President can or should do on these issues. Being nearest “the people” State and U.S. Representative are accountable for legislating the rest.


  • Name: billie
    Date posted: 2008-09-07 9:14 AM
    Hometown: atlanta

    Comment:

    how could anyone say obanna is righ choice, he is a puppet on dnc strings and will do as daily says oprah will keep him in line with what she wants, and we all know how open she is, hides gail in corner, will not allow rnp vp to be on her show (is this reverse discrimation) oh but it ophra and obanna so we should look the other way hmmmm didnt he also refuse to have a woman on the ticket or was that dnc /ophra talking now the rnc has them on a run i will the first time in 30 years of voting swith to republican voting i would never vote for someone who discrimates when it is convient to him and his party the race is over


  • Name: S.
    Date posted: 2008-09-07 7:46 AM
    Hometown: NYC

    Comment:

    Gay couples in NJ are already discovering that their civil-unions are not being recognized by the companies who issue benefits (insurance, health, etc) because the companies that issue benefits do not recognize civil-unions as marriges, and therefor they deny benefits to gay couples. SEPERATE BUT EQUAL DOES NOT WORK (and it never has). Obama is wrong, flat out wrong. His stance on marriage equality is so similiar to McCain's that they are almost identical. Not to mention Obama's troubling history of associating with proponents of the "ex-gay" movement (McClurkin, Meeks, Kirbyjon Caldwell). Don't get it twisted.


  • Name: Morris M
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 8:28 PM
    Hometown: Franklin, IN

    Comment:

    Carol- I agree, I think Obama is the choice. I happen to believe that we deserve better and that his policy is discriminatory, that his message is duplicitous and that an authentic leader of change and civil rights would stand up for equality- FOR ALL!. That such an orator would lend his voice to the cause for marriage when it applies to Gay and Lesbian citizens. You may be comfortable waiting around decades for all the Federal Civil rights denied you, your love, and your children. I'm not. And the youth of the world are not. Obama will be on the wrong side of history when this country and many others continue to embrace same gender marriage. It's hard to be a champion and friend of civil rights when you are so out of touch with what this Gay community is overwhelming fighting for and asking leadership from Senator Obama on.


  • Name: Carol
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 7:14 PM
    Hometown: MO

    Comment:

    Morris M, IN, I understand what you say, but everything that changes is changed in degrees. Obama is a just, and serious thinking man, intelligent and understands his country, its citizens, and the mess this administration has given us. Trust him, he's the best we have. If we changed our laws and made all marriages civil unions and gave everyone the same perks as 'marriage' now gives heterosexuals we would finally be on the same page. The Religious Right could still maintain their religious beliefs about what constituets marriage because they will marry in their churches after the Civil Service Ceremony. There are many Churches of various denominatlons that will marry gay people if they want a religious service. People will call everyone married, and no one will be able to copyright the word so some groups can't use it.


  • Name: Carol
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 6:47 PM
    Hometown: MO

    Comment:

    DF from Lumberton, your idea is a good one. The first ammendment gives the same rights to every American, or it should be doing that. It would take this bickering away in our country. We have been married for fifty-five years, but if we were just starting out I would gladly have two ceremonies if that meant my gay friends and relatives could have the civil rights that our country says they are entitled to. So when do we start? Today?


  • Name: Dray
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 6:40 PM
    Hometown: NYC NY

    Comment:

    Blacks and gays that support McCain/Palin are so desperate to be identified with the rich and powerful that they are willing to throw their own people and ultimately themselves off a cliff. A sad sickness.


  • Name: michael
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 5:33 PM
    Hometown: boston

    Comment:

    Regardless of the gay issues... to think Palin is as fundamentally christian as she is (sending troops to Iraq is "a task that is from God"), is a HUGE concern. She could become the next president if they win this election. Her views, if tested in a military context, could be very destructive. I want a president who will THINK and be reasonable in his (or her) actions. What's frightening? "President Palin". That's what. This election is not just about where these two parties stand on the gay issues (although Obama is closer on our side than McCain/Palin are).


  • Name: DF
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 4:15 PM
    Hometown: Lumberton

    Comment:

    maybe it's time for a different tack. Recognize that marriage is a RELIGIOUS institution best left to the various religions/denominations to regulate as they best see fit. Then demand the USA, due to the First Amendment establishment clause, that government MUST get out of the marriage business entirely. Let the government do ONLY civil unions and civil unions, NOT marriages, would be the basis for all taxes, benefits, legal recognition, etc. Precedence exists in Europe. When Eva Longoria made Tony Parker her life partner in France, she first had a civil ceremony to make it legal for the government and then a separate religious ceremony. Ditto for Germany. Only a civil ceremony officiated by a public official is recognized as legal. Marriage is an optional religious affair. Wouldn't that just twist the shorts of the religious fanatics if marriage was no longer a government function subject to their interference and would be only a matter of civil rights.


  • Name: mike
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 3:36 PM
    Hometown: chicago

    Comment:

    While I agree that for a presidential candidate to come out and say that they support same-gender marriage is political suicide, I also believe that until this happens we will never be acknowledged as equal. Unfortunately American society has established marriage as the bar by which people are either "normal" or not. Marriage has become the litmus test by which we are deemed "acceptable" and therefore "worthy" of true equality. It's also become a catch 22 for our community: you have to be "normal" in order to get the right that, by popularity alone, affords you the characteristic. Neither candidate considers us truly equal. Neither candidate (nor party, for that matter) truly deserves our votes. What we are left with, yet again, is the democrats as the lesser of two evils to "lead" this country. Let's just hope they lead us to a more equal future.


  • Name: RICARDO SANTANA
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 3:26 PM
    Hometown: OAKLAND PARK, FLORIDA

    Comment:

    Name: Wallace Date posted: 2008-09-05 8:21 AM Hometown: Baltimore Comment: I don't understand how any gay or lesbian person could support such a racist, sexist, and homophobic party as the Republican party. I understand many of these gay people think they are "rich", and want to not have pay their fair share in taxes...But John McCain says you are only middle class if you make less than 5 million, so I don't know many gay people making that kind of money...It would seem that from him, most of us are poor. VERY INTERSESTING COMMENT -VERY REALISTIC AND TRUE! UNFORTUNATE BUT TRUE WE NEED TO EDUCATE AND CHAT WITH GAY REPUBLICANS & AFRICAN AMERICAN REPUBLICANS- VERY SAD AND PATHETIC-IT TELLS US THAT AOT OF PEOPLE ARE SELF HATRED! I AM A REALIST . RELIGION IS POISON! SEPARATION OF CHURCH & STATE!!!-RICARDO SANTANA-FREETHINKER


  • Name: Morris M
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 3:21 PM
    Hometown: Franklin, IN

    Comment:

    Carol- Yes, Obama does "say" he supports Gay rights. Funny thing, he does not support our right to marry. And marriage is the only national and international vehicle that grants over a 1000 of these rights that we deserve and our fighting for ourselves and our children. Civil Union's don't give us ANY of these Federal rights that treat us equally. His talk is duplicitous and cheap.


  • Name: RICARDO SANTANA
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 3:15 PM
    Hometown: OAKLAND PARK, FLORIDA

    Comment:

    LIKED YOU ARTICLE! YES WE DEPEND ON THE STATE! ITS AMAZING THE BIGGEST LIE IN AMERICA IS: THAT WE THE PEOPLE ARE CREATED EQUAL" NOT TRUE!!!! THE BIGGEST LIE!!!!!!!! WE HAVE TO FIGHT AND FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHTS LIKE WOMEN AND AFRICAN AMERICANS, VETERANS DID! THEY FOUGHT!!!


  • Name: Keith
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 1:34 PM
    Hometown: San Francisco

    Comment:

    Obama views us as second class citizens. He has repeatedly stated that marriage has a religious component and, as such, we are rightly excluded from participating in the legal aspects. He may go on about civil unions with equivalent rights, but he knows very well that achieving this is impossible and that separate is still not equal. Supporting Obama is supporting the further institutionalization of gays as inferior members of this society. Palin is on the Republican ticket because they believe the fundies might actually vote Democratic. One reason Biden is on the ticket is because the Demos know that gays are rolling over for whatever they are dishing out. Until gays tell them to piss off, we get what we deserve. State issues are our only hope for the next 4 years. Prop 8 is our most important electoral issue this time around.


  • Name: RonK
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 11:39 AM
    Hometown: Clifton, NJ

    Comment:

    You know, gay people can be just as stupid as non-gay people. The fact of the matter is that neither party is fielding a candidate worthy of the LGBT community so it comes down to the lesser of two evils. Homophobia exists in the hearts of our families, the rich and the poor, as well as blacks, whites, yellows and reds. Separation of church and state does not exist anymore. (If it did, marriage would not exist in the tax laws; tax equality should be our focus, not marriage equality.) So, the bottom line is that gays prosper (flourish, thrive, succeed, grow, burgeon, profit, get ahead, boom) only when Democrats are in power. When Republicans are in power, everyone and everything is squandered at the feet of the rich and the powerful. So anyone who thinks the Republicans want education equality, or any kind of equality for that matter, is indeed delusional.


  • Name: Carol
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 11:15 AM
    Hometown: MO

    Comment:

    If everyone listened to everything that Obama says you'd know that he believes that Gay people should have the same civil rights as everyone else. I have yet to hear these words coming out of John McCains lips. Cindy McCain's outfit for the biggest night was supposed to cost three hundred thousand dollars, according to online gossip. It was beautiful, the color, the style....but her hair stylist bombed! Maybe the set just fell apart, or maybe she instructed her stylist to give her what she wanted, who knows? It needs to be shorter, and shaped differently for her face. Clothes are only as attractive as the wearer's hairdo. I'm not a stylist, but I've worked in fashion and have a very critical eye for what is right in this dept.


  • Name: David
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 2:05 AM
    Hometown: Jersey City, NJ

    Comment:

    How can B.O honestly stand in front of the U.S. public and say 'I support gay marriage'. This is politics, so in that one simple statement he writes off 50% of the voting public. Instead, he says 'don't LGs at least deserve to see one another in the hospital?'. Sure it's insulting, but smart politically. He's trying to generate some sense of emphathy and give a carrot to the LGBTs. Honestly, I just don't see B.O rushing to advocate nor advertise LGBT issues from here on out. He'll be reaching for the moderates through employment, education, healthcare and the envir. If elected, this is an admin I can see having a dialogue with the HRC and others. Perhaps we won't see full equality, but I'm positive we won't see a vote on the floor to amend the constitution as we would with McCain/Palin. I realize it's disheartening that a political leader can't just stand up and say this isn't about LGBT rights but equal rights - but then they wouldn't be a political leader would they?


  • Name: gays4palin
    Date posted: 2008-09-06 12:14 AM
    Hometown: westhollywood, ca

    Comment:

    Galen: That is exactly what he meant! That Education is the civil rights of the 21st Century. He specficially called for re-education of workers for 21st Century jobs and government paying you the difference while you work at a lower paying job WHILE being educated for 21st Century well-paying jobs in energy! This statement is a fact in his speech! To succeed, his forward thinking energy plan is going to take high-skilled educated American workers! Jobs! High Wages! Educated!! HELLO!!!!


  • Name: Galen
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 10:18 PM
    Hometown: San Diego, California

    Comment:

    I am not going to defend McCain, but I think it should be noted here that "Education" actually leads directly to Civil and Religious rights for all Americans. Homophobia only exists in ignorance. The truth shall set us free. We have to believe that. I know that's not what McCain meant, but it's true. And btw, I want to acknowledge and thank all those outrageous and courageous heroes made it possible for us to even be HAVING this conversation today. If anyone endured hell on earth it was they who who fought and suffered so that we could take up the cause for equality and justice for all. They are the HEROES to me. I'm no knee-jerk liberal, having graduated from the Naval Academy and being a VietNam era veteran myself, but McCain is just wrong for our times, and he's wrong for America. I am so proud to be alive in these times to be able to see someone like OBAMA being elected President. WOW...who knew?


  • Name: Rich Greedbottom
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 8:46 PM
    Hometown: Moneysville, USA

    Comment:

    Congratulations once more to us Log Cabin Gay Republicans! Once more we have - FROM WITHIN - changed the Republican Party's stance on Gay Rights! See, they used to want to throw us in concentration camps and kill us outright and we've gotten them to the point that they merely want to legislate away our civil rights and ignore the fact that we exist otherwise! HURRAY FOR US!!! We've done SO much good for the Gay community! More than those libruls with their damned same-sex marriage, and their asking to repeal Don't Ask-Don't Tell, and their Hate Crimes legislation, and all those other things they've done. Well - poo on all of that! We Gay Republicans don't WANT any of those things! We'll glady give them up, just so we can show how committed to the Cause of Conservatism!!! That's right, you won't see us in any bars or OUT in public anymore. We're going BACK in the closet! We don't need no silly civil rights! WE WANT CONSERVATISM!!! YEA!


  • Name: David
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 8:37 PM
    Hometown: Jackson, Ohio

    Comment:

    I totally agrre with Daniel from San Francisco!!! Everyone we need to get our head out of the sand. Who is going to represent us a president for 4 years is nothing compared to the people he will appoint to the Supreme Court for the entire rest of thier life and probably the rest of most of our lives. The court has way more effect on our daily life than does the office of President. A vote for McCain is a vote for absolutely more of the same. WE DESERVE BETTER THAN THIS!!!!


  • Name: Judy
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 8:27 PM
    Hometown: Tucson

    Comment:

    Govt health care is not a panacea - but it is vastly better than no health care at all.


  • Name: Kathleen
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 7:30 PM
    Hometown: Baltimore

    Comment:

    As an urban teacher and a lesbian, I take absolutely no offense to McCain's comment about education and civil rights. I think that rights for LGBT people, underserved students, and the uninsured are all such pressing issues that they tie for the position of "civil rights battle." No one who has seen my students or classroom can claim that the struggle for African American civil rights is over. We have 30 books for 100 students, no paper, and high schoolers who can't read- and a 99% African American student body who doesn't fully realize how they've been cheated. I don't support McCain (at all), but I find no fault with anyone who brings attention to the atrocious state of our schools.


  • Name: Daniel
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 6:52 PM
    Hometown: San Francisco

    Comment:

    Bottom line - Anyone who would vote for someone who is going to appoint supreme court justices to LIFETIME positions who don't support full equality for all people is an idiot.


  • Name: Michael
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 5:49 PM
    Hometown: Sacramento

    Comment:

    All schools in this country are failing gay students. They are subjected to ridicule, missinformation, discrimination and violence by students, faculty, administrators and parents. Of course we have to look at the world through a gay prism. No one else is looking out for our survival.


  • Name: Wayne
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 5:27 PM
    Hometown: Leesburg, VA

    Comment:

    They do not hate us. Enough of this talk of hate. For the first time ever, Log Cabin Republicans were fully accredited guests of the National Republican Committee and met with McCain's Campaign Manager which you can read about on this site. Obama does not support gay marriage either. Whether he supports local bans, I honestly do not know as Dems running for office usually evade the question. Only Hillary came out in support of same sex unions. Again stop the the hate and demonizing. I do not hate Obama, I just disagree with him on several issues including universal healthcare that you are appear to be for. I have had family on government health plans, I would not wish that on anyone.


  • Name: DANTE F.
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 4:14 PM
    Hometown: CHICAGO

    Comment:

    i'm a progressive independent, so i can't rightfully speak to one party or the other being more in my camp, but it is clear that McCain is squarely in the camp of our enemies -- he not only doesn't support gay marriage, he actively supports state amendments (including his own state of Arizona's) to deny us any civil rights when it comes to civil unions. he supports a senseless war that has killed so many, including gay and lesbian U.S. soldiers, he does not support universal healthcare, he does not support reproduction rights, and he doesn't support real protections for the environment. whether you like Obama or not, voting against him or staying home is a vote for the people who hate us. grow up people, and make your vote count.


  • Name: Jay
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 3:37 PM
    Hometown: Nashville

    Comment:

    I'm not being fooled at all by the relatively minimal number of swipes taken at us this year. If anyone can remember back to the past few Republican conventions, the gay community has been their token whipping horse. And don't forget that the offical GOP platform this year still singles us out specifically as deserving of discrimination. During the Bush/Cheney years, some government departments were banning the meetings by their gay employees. Don't forget the current scandal where candidates were being disqualified for judgeships because, among other reasons, they might be friendly to gays. Why on Earth would I want to cast a vote FOR any group holding me in such contempt? It's as stupid as proposing to your abusive boyfriend; hold on to some of your dignity, folks.


  • Name: rgm
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 3:23 PM
    Hometown: wdc

    Comment:

    Just to clarify, John McCain is NOT in favor of civil unions and he fully supports "states" efforts to constitutionally ban gay marriage. He is on record for supporting the repeal of gay marriage in California (proposition 8) and he supports the amendment of Arizona (2008) constitution to ban the recognition of same sex couples. He boasts to evangelicals that he campaigned for the passage of Arizonans 2005 failed referendum which sought not only to ban gay marriage but deny any government benefits to same sex couple banning both civil unions and domestic partnerships.


  • Name: Wayne
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 2:23 PM
    Hometown: Leesburg, VA

    Comment:

    Seeing the comments to this articles makes me have hope for the GLBT movement. Neither party has it right when it comes to gay issues. Neither party support Gay Marriages and both candidates voted against the Federal Amendment for the same reason that it is a state issue and not a federal issue. As a community we do have real issues and problems to face and gay marriage/civil unions is one of them. Our community fails to see that the word marriage means a holy union, a religious union to the majority of Americans. That is why these amendments pass in the states to ban them because it brings people who otherwise have no problems giving us rights and benefits over to the other side because we are seen as attacking their religious beliefs. If you present them with same sex unions with all the benefits of a marriage then the opposition falls and the majority is in our favor.


  • Name: Danny
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 2:15 PM
    Hometown: Seattle

    Comment:

    a recent article in The Advocate pointed out that as much as 24% of the Gay community voted for George W. Bush. Someone you know voted for Bush and will vote for McCain. Ask, and ask why.


  • Name: S.L.Holm
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 1:50 PM
    Hometown: Leesburg FL

    Comment:

    PUBLIC EDUCATION is under attack (STILL) by these right-wingnuts called the GOP. It's not a "civil right": that one was already fought when the concept of "PUBLIC" schools came into being, taking tax money to guarantee that ALL children are guaranteed the opportunity for education. It's the extremists who are trying to force us all to "give" the schools "back" to the CHURCHES to be run. This is a serious attack on all things American. It's pretty clear that the only reason the GOP even exists anymore is to pander to the Christian Extremists who are every bit as much terrorists as any Taliban. McCain/Palin must be defeated.


  • Name: Jill
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 1:49 PM
    Hometown: New York City

    Comment:

    To say that McCain's comments are a thinly veiled dig at gays and lesbians is to not understand--or care, for that matter--that it is African-American children who are overwhelmingly affected by failing schools. They are the children who are not being educated. This is indeed a very important issue for our country. Country First! Must some of us only see the world through a gay prism??


  • Name: AJF
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 1:41 PM
    Hometown: Phoenix

    Comment:

    McCain doesn’t believe that LGBT fight for equal rights it the civil rights issue of the 21st century. In the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries it was women and in the 20th century it was African-Americans fighting for equal rights and equal protection under the law (Martin Luther King Jr.). So McCain is subtly (or not) saying that the LGBT fight for equal rights and protection under the law is not the civil rights issue in this country in the 21st century. He just cast the entire population aside with one comment.


  • Name: Frank Ricketts
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 1:30 PM
    Hometown: Indianapolis

    Comment:

    I was pleased to see many comment on this authors " looking for insult." And to two posters - As a Gay Republican, I do not hate myself, nor do I need healing. Just because I am Republican and gay, does not mean I blindly vote Democratic. I vote candidates, usually Republican, and I have voted Democratic.


  • Name: Keith
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 12:33 PM
    Hometown: San Francisco

    Comment:

    Obama's glass is always half-full and McCain's is always half-empty. I don't support either candidate or party, but I can recognize biased journalism when I read it. Obama insults us with his separate but equal line, then waters that down to all we need is hospital visitation rights (because we're all dying anyway), and the Advocate declares that he's made Gay History. McCain makes two comments which might be references to gay-related issues and the Advocate jumps all over it. Even if I do agree that McCain's statements were thinly veiled homophobia, I have to ask myself why Obama doesn't come under the same scrutiny? Could it be that the Advocate is setting it up to show what good little homos they were by delivering our vote?


  • Name: Daniel
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 11:33 AM
    Hometown: Philly

    Comment:

    The reference is hidden in the fact that, in the minds of conservatives, gays are not really "discriminated" against and thus gay rights issues are not really "civil rights" issues. Conservatives often note that gays are NOT denied the right to marry (they just can't marry someone of the same sex), that things like Hate Crimes and anti-discrimination laws constitute the creation of new "special rights" rather than equal rights and that keeping gays out of the military is not a question of civil rights but rather simply enforcing military policy regarding sexual conduct. Thus saying that education is the main civil rights issue of the 21st Century is a way of contending that the gay rights movement is irrelevant. Since education is widely available and the larger problem is how people are using it making it a "civil rights" issue is a bit of a smokescreen.


  • Name: Jack
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 11:25 AM
    Hometown: Atlanta

    Comment:

    The dig was so thinly veiled that this life-long Democrat and out and proud gay man can not see it at all. Maybe Mr. Kennedy would like to elaborate?


  • Name: Randy
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 10:50 AM
    Hometown: Butler

    Comment:

    Am I the only one who thought there was more meaning to all the "Straight Talk" signs than encouraging honesty?


  • Name: Greg
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 9:58 AM
    Hometown: Bangor, Maine

    Comment:

    Education IS a civil rights issue. But he will make it a capitalist issue. The strongest survive. Parents will take their kids to the schools with the highest SAT scores and college acceptance numbers. This will leave out children with learning disabilities as their pesence will lower scores and therefore income for the school. They will be stuck in 'sink schools', less privilege and resources. Their civil rights will be violated. In the same way, as a partnered gay man I do not begin with same the same civil rights as a 'straight' man with a 'normal' (Palin) family. In a society where a potential president views education in this way, he is privileged and intends his kind to remain so.


  • Name: S.
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 8:34 AM
    Hometown: NYC

    Comment:

    Huh? How did saying "education was the civil rights issue of this century" refer to gays in any way? Sound like you are reaching really hard for something that's not there. You want to dog McCain out for something he hasn't even said. Yet you praise Obama for his insulting "Seperate But Equal" civil unions instead of actually supporting equality.


  • Name: Wallace
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 8:21 AM
    Hometown: Baltimore

    Comment:

    I don't understand how any gay or lesbian person could support such a racist, sexist, and homophobic party as the Republican party. I understand many of these gay people think they are "rich", and want to not have pay their fair share in taxes...But John McCain says you are only middle class if you make less than 5 million, so I don't know many gay people making that kind of money...It would seem that from him, most of us are poor. Anyway, this party wants to turn back the hands of time on all the progress that has been made for gay, lesbian, women, minorities, prisoners of war, immigrants...Everyone that isn't white and privileged and male... Like someone said, these gays and lesbians that identify with this party, are pretty much like black people that do...They hate themselves.


  • Name: Master Bob
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 8:03 AM
    Hometown: Amsterdam

    Comment:

    The Log Cabin Republicans and their supporters who endorse McCain remind one of the German Jews in the 1930s who believed that they were Germans first, so that nothing would happen to them. QED Those GLBT folk who support McCain are riddled with internalized homophobia. They are the ones who need healing.


  • Name: Tim Hulsey
    Date posted: 2008-09-05 3:50 AM
    Hometown: Charlottesville

    Comment:

    The only thing dubious here is Kennedy's sinister interpretation of McCain's innocuous speech.


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • Austerity Chic
    How novelist and performance artist Mike Albo gets by in lean times.
  • Hoping to "Wu" Michelle
    Dressing Michelle Obama in November was a game changer for designer Jason Wu. Now he has his sights set on the future first lady’s most high-profile event: Inauguration Day.
  • Great American Couple
    In an exclusive excerpt from his new book, Hollywood Bohemians: Transgressive Sexuality and the Selling of the Movieland Dream, Brett L. Abrams explores the relationship between Cary Grant and Randolph Scott, who led homosexual lives right under everyone's nose.
  • Mormons Gone Wild
    After one man undresses missionaries for his calendar, LDS Church–owned Brigham Young University strips him of his degree.
  • Constructive Impatience
    Stung by the Warren decision, GLAAD's former executive director Joan Garry offers the Obama transition team some sage advice.
  • Boxer Goes Trans for Eli Stone
    Often perceived as male by confused casting agents, boxer-body builder turned actor Dallas Malloy felt a deep connection to the trans minister she plays on Eli Stone.
  • Mamma Mia! Rises Again
    Meryl Streep and company managed to top Harry Potter and Titanic at the U.K. box office, and now Mamma Mia! is poised to break similar records on DVD. Director Phyllida Lloyd talked to Advocate.com about bringing one of the biggest musicals of all time to the big screen.
  • The Other White Meat
    As one of the subjects of the documentary about the drag pageant circuit, Pageant, opening in select theaters, and one of the contestants on RuPaul's Drag Race, premiering next month on Logo, Victoria "Porkchop" Parker may not look or act like your typical female impersonator, but make no mistake, she is one of the best.
  • The Religious Defense
    In an excerpt from her new book, Bulletproof Faith: A Spiritual Survival Guide for Gay and Lesbian Christians, author Candace Chellew-Hodge incorporates the wisdom of Xena: Warrior Princess to illustrate her theories as to how gay and lesbian people of faith can protect themselves from those who attack their views.
  • Photo Finish
    Did Prop. 8 backlash cause art censorship -- or its reversal -- at Brigham Young University? Could be, as BYU photography student J. Michael Wiltbank found when his contribution to a two-week-long art exhibition -- eight pairs of benign portraits, each depicting an LGBT-identified BYU student alongside a supportive friend -- had been removed.
  • The Divine Miss M.
    Since the death of performer Wayland Flowers in 1988, his over-the-top puppet creation Madame has been seen only sporadically. But with the launch of her new casino tour, Madame is back.
  • Whither NLGJA?
    The leading professional organization for LGBT journalists is facing a crisis that threatens its very survival. In a changing media landscape and a tough economy, how does a small nonprofit live up to its mission and retain members?
  • The Road to Equality
    Barbara Boxer, the U.S. senator from California, understands why her gay constituents are furious over Rick Warren's role in the inauguration -- it feels like Proposition 8 redux.
  • A Call to Action for Barack Obama
    In the wake of the decision by President-elect Barack Obama to select Reverend Rick Warren to give the invocation at his inauguration, Equality California executive director Geoff Kors calls on Obama to live up to his promise of "One America" and prove he is the ardent supporter of LGBT equality he claims to be.
  • Gays Shut Out of Cabinet
    As if the news of antigay pastor Rick Warren's invitation to deliver Obama's inaugural invocation weren't insulting enough to LGBT Americans, we're now hit with the reality that no openly gay people will be seated at the cabinet table to weigh in on the next antigay flap.
  • Wading Your Way Through Hollywood
    Reichen Lehmkuhl switches hats for his second column and leaves the activist at the door as he offers some sage advice for Hollywood hopefuls. Whether you're gay or straight, what Reichen has to say about "talent" puts the business that is entertainment into perspective.
  • The Better Angels?
    President-elect Barack Obama's choice of Rick Warren to give the invocation at his inauguration puts LGBT Americans on notice: While the next four years hold unprecedented promise for our rights, we may sometimes feel forsaken.
  • Stage Doubt, Screen Doubt
    On Broadway, Doubt -- the story of a steely nun facing off against a heroic priest, whom she fixates on for giving special attention to the school’s only black (effeminate) kid -- worked because of a top notch cast and its unique brand of stylized narrative. If only the excellent Meryl Streep and Viola Davis were enough to make the movie work quite so well.
  • People of the Year: Al Gore, Chad Griffin, and Lawrence King
    This week Advocate.com is going to highlight our remaining People of the Year, who range from activists to entertainers, politicians to students. Today we take a look at environmentalist Al Gore, political strategist Chad Griffin, and slain student Lawrence King.