
A California judge Tuesday appointed a guardian to protect the interests of 14-year-old Brandon McInerney, the accused killer of openly gay 15-year-old classmate Lawrence King, the Ventura County Star reports. The move came after McInerney’s family said it wanted to fire the public defender’s office, which is currently representing McInerney, in favor of a private law firm that has reportedly agreed to defend the case for $1. A preliminary hearing set for Tuesday was postponed until October 14, when the court will also decide who will represent McInerney, in addition to other issues.
According to witnesses, McInerney shot King in the head on February 12 during first period in a packed classroom at E.O. Green Junior High School in Oxnard, a largely blue-collar port city of nearly 200,000 people about 60 miles north of Los Angeles. McInerney is being tried as an adult on charges of premeditated murder with a special hate-crime allegation.
Proposition 21, a controversial law enacted by a state ballot initiative in 2000, affords district attorneys more or less unfettered discretion to try juveniles as young as age 14 as adults for certain felonies. A defense motion to transfer the case to juvenile court on constitutional grounds was denied in July.
McInerney’s family wants to replace the public defender’s office with Scott Wippert, an attorney with the United Defense Group, a nationwide criminal defense firm based in Los Angeles's Studio City, and also with North Hollywood attorney Robyn Bramson. United Defense Group has agreed to take the case on for $1, according to Senior Deputy Public Defender William Quest, who has been representing McInerney. “A law firm for hire that takes on a case of this magnitude for $1?” Quest said. “Red flags are raised.”
Speaking to The Advocate and reporters from other outlets in the courthouse Tuesday, Quest elaborated, saying, “This is a case of high magnitude that’s going to require a lot of resources...unless [United Defense Group] have juvenile justice at heart, this is a for-profit firm.”
He expressed particular concern regarding whether the new firm would provide expert witnesses that might be necessary to McInerney’s defense. “Whether or not [the lawyers] do it for free, experts are not going to testify for free, and this case is going to require the best experts," he said. "Our concern is they don’t have the resources to adequately represent Brandon...monetary resources to pay for the experts.”
Quest declined to identify the specific experts the defense might need. “To do this case properly,” he said, would “cost in excess of six figures easy, and anyone worth their salt would be charging that.”
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.