With all the controversy surrounding same-sex marriage last week, gay Americans tuned into Saturday Night Live to see the political parody that would ensue. While we were expecting one, maybe two mentions, we were surprised to find a show that was almost entirely gay-themed. Some people were amused, and some, particularly several gay bloggers, accused SNL of hurting the movement by creating one-dimensional or stereotypical gay characters. We caught up with 35-year-old SNL head writer Seth Meyers in the middle of his read-through for this week's show, to ask him his response to those claims and also to find out how created the gayest episode of Saturday Night Live ever.
Advocate.com:
I talked to Tina Fey recently, who credited you with
most of her impersonation of Sarah Palin as you wrote
the sketches. When you were writing those, were
you thinking specifically about the moments that
you were discussing gay rights or was it sort of,
everything about Palin is hilarious?
Seth Meyers: We sort of hit everything. As I
keep pointing out, everyone was paying so much attention to
her that you could sort of play with the minutiae.
Fey is really reluctant to admit that she or you
had anything to do with “taking Palin
down,” but I think the public feels that
you and she were very important in pointing out her
hypocrisies in way that pundits were unable to do.
It was funny, because the vice-presidential
debate, which was probably my favorite of the
sketches, we also hit on Biden and that one slips by.
That was a weird moment for gay people in America
when the candidate that they supported was forced into
the corner and came out against us in some ways.
Yeah, when it came down to a yes or no answer,
it was like very clearly no. [Laughs]
But I want to talk about last Saturday. Was it a
conscious effort on your part to write a very gay episode?
This is the honest truth: It really
wasn’t. That’s just not how our show
works. We’re not a top-down show where we have a
meeting on Monday and assign stuff. Everyone goes off
and writes their own thing. Certainly it was more than
I think anyone expected, but I think with what was in the
air and with Proposition 8, I think different people had
different ideas. Once that happens it just turns into
a meritocracy on the pieces.
So were there even more sketches about this subject
that didn’t make the show.
Not that many. For instance, Paul [Rudd] was a
fan of one of our last scenes, “The Mechanic
Bill,” and a couple of others. If you went piece by
piece, each one had a reason for why it was in, and the
reason would be boring.
Did you conceive the Snagglepuss sketch?
That is the thing where you have a new cast
member, Bobby Moynihan, and one of the things he
auditioned with was Snagglepuss. I can tell you, as a
new cast member your radar is always up to find ways to get
the stuff you brought with you on the air. As it
turned out that was a pretty funny way to get it in.
Because bringing Snagglepuss on Weekend Update was
going to be a pretty tough sell unless there was some sort
of in.
OK, so everyone comes back from writing and you are
in a room, and I assume Paul Rudd is there and they are
pitching their ideas ...
The way it works is that there is a
read-through. There are about 45 pieces, and of those
we pick about 12, and of those 12, about seven or
eight went into the show.
Right, and so all of you come in the room to pitch
the sketches, and is there a moment where you are like, Look,
a lot of us seem to be doing a lot of gay sketches?
To some degree. Not to minimize, it but we are
having the same issue this week with Thanksgiving.
[Laughs] When you have to do 22 of these shows
a year, sometimes you just do the biggest story or
whatever everyone is talking about. I will say that it
will be much harder with Thanksgiving because they
will all look the same, where as with last week there
were a lot of different looks.
Then you have “The Kissing Family Scene,” not a scene that anybody here considered to be about gay rights or gay themes in general. That was written for a previous episode earlier in the year, and that reached its destination because it was heightening a nonsexual, affectionate family. Against a backdrop of everything else we were doing, I guess some people took it to be about that.
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.