Issue Number 994 | The Accidental Homo | Advocate.com The Accidental Homo  | Commentary | Advocate.com

||  Spectator: DVD  ||
     
The Accidental Homo
Project Greenlight star Pete Jones never envisioned his second film as a gay movie, but he managed to make one anyway. Is this progress?
From The Advocate  October 9, 2007
The Accidental Homo

Pete Jones has a wife and kids, and at this moment, he’s fidgeting with his wedding band.

“Did I have a gay experience or am I gay? Trust me, everyone asks me now,” says the director, referring to his direct-to-DVD comedy Outing Riley, about a “beer-drinking, sports-watching” guy who’s comfortable with his own sexuality but still in the closet to his family -- until he finally comes out to his macho Chicago brothers after their parents’ death. “I never thought of it as a gay movie. That’s the honest-to-goodness truth. I wanted to create a movie about a family, and I came up with the scenario where I asked myself, ‘What would happen in my family if one of us came out as gay?’ ”

When pressed, Jones will admit he actually doesn’t have any experience with gay people, making one wonder why he would decide to write, direct, and star in a gay film. Basically, Jones thought it would be funny. Had Jones written this film in the ’50s, the joke might have been that his Catholic-raised character is secretly a Protestant; in the ’60s, comic tension might swirl around his best friend being a black man, à la Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner. Has being gay become just another viable fish-out-of-water plot?

Rather than showing straight family members as intolerant bigots, Outing Riley paints a nuanced, comic portrait of men learning that someone they love deeply isn’t who they thought he was. And our hero’s response -- he’s still the same person; hiding the truth didn’t mean he doesn’t trust and love them -- will resonate with gay audiences.

Jones was the star of HBO’s Project Greenlight, a filmmaking reality show, in its first season, which aired in 2001. He directed his first film, Stolen Summer, under the microscope of that weekly TV series. The film was panned by critics (Jones still recalls it being coined an “after-school special”) and brought in a paltry $135,000 at the box office. What’s more, the TV show often portrayed Jones as incompetent, bumbling, and demanding.

“Stolen Summer was a fluke,” he explains. “I wrote this script, I knew it didn’t have much commerciality, and I put it on the Internet in this contest because I was an unemployed writer. The next thing I know, I win the thing.” Jones says the sensibilities of his first film aren’t in keeping with his own, which is why the Chicago native wanted his sophomore offering to be more edgy -- closer to his own aesthetic. “I thought it would be interesting to make a film where the gay guy wasn’t just a flamboyant ‘Sean Hayes in Will & Grace’ sidekick.”

Prior to its first screening, Jones worried that the gay community wouldn’t be receptive to Outing Riley. But after the film received an overwhelmingly positive response at the Miami Gay and Lesbian Film Festival, Jones suddenly realized the gay audience wouldn’t be the problem.

“When we showed the film to [the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation], they called it a ‘breakthrough movie,’ ” says producer Judd Nissen. “That was the first time we were like, Uh-oh, that’s what we have.” Straight audiences, like the one at the Chicago International Film Festival, seemed puzzled. Says Jones: “People come up after the film, pat me on the shoulder, and go, ‘Good movie. Good job,’ and they’re walking away going, Huh? Did we not just see you making out with a guy on-screen? What the hell’s going on here?”  

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.