Wolfson: Lingle Veto "Profoundly Disingenuous"
BY Julie Bolcer
July 07 2010 10:05 AM ET
“Even on her own terms, people did vote, and they voted to allow the legislature to do exactly what she vetoed last night,” said Wolfson.
He also blasted Lingle, who opposes marriage equality, for her assertion that civil unions and same-sex marriages are essentially the same.
“Civil unions do bring important protections,” he said. “They do not provide the full measure of protection or perhaps even more important, intangible security, clarity and dignity. If the governor took weeks and weeks and weeks of dragging people thorough a delaying process, I’m sure she learned that.”
Almost immediately after the governor’s announcement, Lambda Legal and the ACLU announced they would activate a lawsuit waiting in the wings since January. As for a legislative remedy, lawmakers previously indicated they would not attempt to override a veto.
Legal and legislative tactics need to be combined with public education for redoubled efforts on all three fronts, said Wolfson.
“There are these three areas: public education, litigation and legislation,” said Wolfson. “I think we need to move forward on all of them. At the heart of it is really having a deeper conversation with the people of Hawaii and others around the country about why marriage matters. To not have that conversation, and to only talk about civil unions, gets us a veto and a disingenuous claim that it’s all the same. If that’s the case, we might as well fight for what we deserve.”
- Tennessee Hardware Store Puts Up 'No Gays Allowed' Sign
- Girl Scouts Return $100K When Donor Demands It 'Not Be Used' For Trans Girls
- Why Is the Duggar Family Paying the Cops Investigating Them?
- Girl Scouts Raise $100,000 in One Day After Dropping Transphobic Donor
- Why These Four Justices Rejected Marriage Equality
- #TBT: They Died in the Closet