
CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
The Log Cabin Republicans filed papers Friday asking the U.S. Supreme Court to reinstate a worldwide injunction on enforcement of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy while the case is being litigated. (Appendix here.)
Judge Virginia Phillips originally upended the policy in a historic ruling last month that found the law unconstitutional, but the ninth circuit court of appeals stayed Judge Phillips's injunction pending appeal after the U.S. Department of Justice filed an emergency request.
Log Cabin's lead attorney in the case said the group was asking the Supreme Court to get involved because officials believed the ninth circuit had overreached when it suspended the injunction.
"We argue in this application that the ninth circuit order was arbitrary and an abuse of discretion and should be vacated immediately," said Dan Woods of White & Case.
Richard Socarides, a New York lawyer and former LGBT adviser to President Bill Clinton, said the move was unusual because Log Cabin is effectively asking the Supreme Court to take sides very early in the process.
"It's rare for any litigant to pursue an interim stay issue all the way to the Supreme Court. It involves the court in the case at a very early stage of the appeals process and is often considered risky," he explained. "That said, I imagine the plaintiffs feel they don't have much to lose, even though the likelihood of success on this interim request is low. But if they do prevail, they would gain a lot of strategic leverage."
The appeal to Supreme Court justice Anthony M. Kennedy is seemingly a long shot. Justice Elena Kagan may have to recuse herself from the case based on her former role as solicitor general for the government while the case was in its initial stages. That would leave four conservative-leaning justices (John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas) and three liberal-leaning ones (Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer). Justice Kennedy is considered the swing vote, as always, but Kagan's recusal leaves the left one justice short.
The executive director of Log Cabin lamented the fact that the request was necessary in the first place.
"It is unfortunate the Obama Justice Department has forced the Log Cabin Republicans to go to the Supreme Court," R. Clarke Cooper said in a statement.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Celebrated queer poet Andrea Gibson dead at 49
July 14 2025 6:25 PM
19 photos from 1990s San Francisco show the roots of butch and femme culture
July 14 2025 2:12 PM
Ellen DeGeneres shows unexpected support for Rosie O'Donnell in Trump feud
July 14 2025 12:19 PM
Florida Republican official suspended for social posts mocking Pulse murder victims
July 14 2025 11:41 AM
How drag artists can protect themselves from the far-right attacks
July 14 2025 6:00 AM
Donald Trump threatens to revoke Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship — but he can't
July 12 2025 6:04 PM