
CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Mike Honda, a Democrat representing California's Silicon Valley, wants a House hearing to address the rapidly rising price tag for keeping the Defense of Marriage Act alive -- where legal bills could now total $1.5 million.
Honda is a ranking member of the House Legislative Branch Appropriations Subcommittee. In a letter sent yesterday to the Subcommittee's Chairman -- Ander Crenshaw (R-Florida) -- Honda asked for a hearing so the American people can understand why the House is spending taxpayers' money on the defense of DOMA. Initially, House leadership agreed to spend no more than $500,000 on legal services for DOMA. The House general counsel upped that amount to $750,000, then said up to $1.5 million can be spent with written consent.
"In a time of professed fiscal responsibility, it is unconscionable for the House Republican Leadership to continue to spend taxpayer money to protect discrimination, especially through a process that has, thus far, lacked any semblance of transparency," reads the letter. "I ask that you immediately hold a hearing on this matter so that we can shine light on this irresponsible, backdoor use of taxpayer money. Our subcommittee and the American people deserve to know why the House Republican Leadership is pursuing this effort to protect a discriminatory law, an effort which, at a time of high unemployment, only serves to create jobs for Speaker Boehner's hand-picked, high-priced lawyers. We also deserve to know why the cost has escalated so rapidly in such a short time, and how much the Republican Leadership plans to spend on this unwise endeavor. We should not be handing over a blank check that will allow unlimited taxpayer dollars to be spent on the Republican Leadership's political agenda."
Nbroverman
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Heritage Foundation cofounder Edwin Feulner dead at 83
July 22 2025 4:37 PM
Bob the Drag Queen says, 'No one should be speaking to Charlie Kirk'
July 22 2025 1:00 PM
Heavy metal icon and gay rights supporter Ozzy Osbourne dies at 76
July 22 2025 2:48 PM
Trump's new strategy to restrict abortion nationwide — don't say ‘ban’
July 22 2025 1:17 PM
U.S. Olympic Committee bars trans women from competing, caving to Trump
July 22 2025 4:47 PM
Women’s contributions and men’s racism erased from history of national monument
July 22 2025 1:48 PM
Trending stories
Recommended Stories for You
Neal Broverman
Neal Broverman is the Editorial Director, Print of Pride Media, publishers of The Advocate, Out, Out Traveler, and Plus, spending more than 20 years in journalism. He indulges his interest in transportation and urban planning with regular contributions to Los Angeles magazine, and his work has also appeared in the Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He lives in the City of Angels with his husband, children, and their chiweenie.
Neal Broverman is the Editorial Director, Print of Pride Media, publishers of The Advocate, Out, Out Traveler, and Plus, spending more than 20 years in journalism. He indulges his interest in transportation and urban planning with regular contributions to Los Angeles magazine, and his work has also appeared in the Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He lives in the City of Angels with his husband, children, and their chiweenie.