In his first speech as a Nobel laureate, Barack Obama has a chance Saturday to show the world that the U.S. is ready to move beyond tolerance to equality. But a message replete with soaring rhetoric and shy on specifics might not placate LGBT activists.
President Barack Obama’s big speech on Saturday awaits and
what it will bring is anybody’s guess.
A spokesperson for the White House said on Friday evening
that the president “looks forward to speaking directly to the LGBT community
about the steps his administration has taken thus far and the progress he hopes
to achieve in the coming weeks and months.”
That statement suggests Obama might deliver some fresh
piece of information Saturday, but White House press secretary Robert Gibbs on
Friday didn’t presage anything new during Friday’s briefing, saying only that
he expected the president to talk about “a range of issues.”
When I asked Gibbs if the president would highlight anything
beyond the recently nominated openly gay ambassador and the nearly sealed hate-crimes legislation, Gibbs said he didn’t want to “zoom past” the hate-crimes
achievement.
“Hate-crimes protections are long overdue, in the president's opinion,” Gibbs said. “He believes that their passage represents an
important step, and looks forward to, when that legislation gets to his desk,
signing it and making that the law of the land. I think that's certainly part
of what he'll discuss on Saturday night.”
Based on that response, I think it’s safe to say that hate
crimes will clearly be a major emphasis of the speech.
Then there was a tidbit in The Washington Post suggesting, “Obama
will stress incremental advancements as evidence of progress.”
The article sources “a Democratic source familiar with the
White House’s thinking,” which, if true, suggests that the White House is
trying to soft-pedal the speech.
The incremental concept brought a scathing rebuke from John
Aravosis at Americablog, who wrote: “And now, to add insult to the injury, we
face the subtle bigotry of ‘incrementalism.’ The White House has found a new
buzzword -- a rhetorical silver bullet to get the president off the hook for yet
another forgotten promise.”
But I keep wondering, if the president can’t offer anything
new to the LGBT community in what sources say will be a 20-minute speech, why not just have family night at home with Michelle and the
girls and eat pizza?
Sure, Obama might get some credit just for showing up at the dinner, but
my guess is that his inner circle would deem that far riskier than not showing
up. So why take the risk unless you believe you can pull something out of your magic hat?
Lt. Col. Victor Fehrenbach, who is in the process of being
discharged under the military’s gay ban, called on the president to provide details
about ending the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.
“The president told me in June, ‘We’ll get this done,’” said Fehrenbach,
who spoke to Obama at the White House Stonewall celebration in June. “I hope to
hear from him this weekend about timing -- specifically when the president plans
on working with Congress to reverse the law.”
Fehrenbach’s call to action was joined this week by
Congressman Alcee Hastings of Florida, who also pressed Obama for a repeal
timeline. “Congress has yet to receive indication from the Executive that it is
ready to proceed with a repeal process that requires leadership on all fronts,”
read a letter Hastings sent to the president.
And then there was Congressman Joe Sestak of Pennsylvania, a
former Navy officer, who wrote, “I cannot imagine
denying equal rights to anyone I served with. How can anyone say, we fought and
served together, we depended on one another, we risked our lives for this
country, but back home you shouldn’t enjoy the rights that you defended?”
Setting out a path to overturning the gay ban on Saturday
would certainly be noteworthy, but earlier this week, Gibbs’s reaction to questioning about a Senate sponsor for repeal or a timeline led me to believe
that the policy hadn’t been a hot topic of conversation recently at the White House.
Longtime activist David Mixner looked outside the Beltway
and said he would be “thrilled” if the president took a stance on the upcoming
referendum on Maine’s same-sex marriage law. But based on Washington buzz, the
CBO might score those odds at slim to none.
So what’s left and will it be enough for LGBT activists? As
a political insider said to me, “It’s easy to dress up presidential remarks.”
And the backdrop for this speech is that Obama's words will be the first he delivers as a Nobel laureate.
“I will accept this award as a call to action, a call to
all nations to confront the common challenges of the 21st century,” Obama said
of his unexpected honor Friday.
Certainly differing degrees of homophobia around the world
qualify as a “common challenge,” continuing to mock and ravage the promise of
peace for people who love outside the boundaries of common acceptance.
Saturday night offers the new Nobel Peace Prize winner a
perfect opportunity to send a message to the world that human rights are not
simply tolerated -- but elevated -- right here at home.
Click here to follow The Advocate on Twitter.
Page 1 of 1