Continental promo
|| Home > Commentary  ||
 

Taking back the black gay movement

Why is it all the white-led LGBT groups think they know how to reach out to African-Americans about gay rights? And do they willingly push black queer groups out of the way in the process?
An Advocate.com exclusive posted July 11, 2006
Taking back the black gay movement

Before you cry foul, if what I am about to say doesn’t apply to you, keep up the good work. We need your support to get the job done for all of us. For those of you who read this and think me to be against marriage equality; I am not. Remember, I started one of the first black-led marriage equality campaigns in the nation—but enough with the disclaimers.

You may not know it, but there’s a contingency made up mostly of white gay people who are conspiring on ways to organize blacks. And not only do they want to organize blacks to spread their message of marriage for everyone, but they also want to do it through black gays.

Yeah, I said it. Somebody needed to.

The relationship between black gay organizations and some of the other gay groups is strained. Publicly, those groups embrace us and applaud our efforts as blacks, but behind closed doors they’re figuring out how to move us out of the picture and do the job that we are doing.

Did you know gay organizations are meeting every day to strategize on how to best mobilize black gays for the purpose of “diversity?” Those organizations have somehow gotten it into their heads that nonblack gays hold the key to breaking the cycle of homophobia in the black community.

Can you imagine that?

Let me get this straight, no pun intended. Individuals who are not from black communities—and know little to nothing about our community and for the most part aren’t even remotely interested in really working with our community—know how to talk to blacks about marriage.

And if that wasn’t bad enough, they’ve hired a few Negroes to be the black faces for their organizations so that they can get into rooms where traditionally they’ve been unwelcome. But don’t get me wrong. These Negroes-for-hire work overtime at earning their paycheck, at times even to the detriment of their own community.

Similar to the co-opting of black pulpits to spread the white conservative agenda during the 2004 presidential election, black gay groups are being taken over by the gay agenda, and nowhere is this more prevalent than in California, where one of the more prominent gay groups is working overtime at telling black gays what they need to say to black people about marriage.

To date, this group has hired a resident Negro who has no connection whatsoever to the black community, bought and paid for one of the few black gay groups in California, and is seeking to drive a “coalition” plan to get the other groups on board with their message. All of this in the name of diversity. Yeah, right.

But it gets even worse.

This gay group has now set its aspirations on black politicians in California after hearing from other black gays that it didn’t have a relationship with those officials. As with everything else, they’ve bypassed the black gay leadership and they are now trying to get the blacks in Sacramento on their team, using any method necessary—which usually means money and a lot of it. This is the reason black politicians and black leaders don’t know anything about the black gay leadership. Gay groups with more money beat us to the punch every time and take credit for everything.

Enough is enough.

Recently, one of the resident Negroes at one of the national gay groups announced that she had single-handedly held a meeting with the editors and executive officers of Johnson Publishing Company in Chicago. What she didn’t say is that she got the idea to have the meeting because a black gay group’s communications director, who quite frankly was wet behind the ears, called her and asked for Johnson Publishing’s contact information and leaked his idea about the meeting. Because she was faster and had more money behind her to arrange the meeting, she beat him to the punch and has now probably earned herself a raise.

It’s that kind of atrocious and cutthroat behavior that is destroying the black gay community.

Which is not to say that blacks working for national gay groups can’t do good work. But in its 20-plus-year history, this particular LGBT organization has never demonstrated a real interest in supporting the African-American community.

Black gays don’t need nonblack gays to organize them. We’ve been down this road before, and it’s not an effective strategy. Black gays can handle the black community on their own. You don’t see us trying to proselytize outside of our community on gay marriage in an effort to organize the LGBT community as a whole. What the hell gives others the right to come into our community and try to undo all of the years of hard work that black gays have put into fighting for our civil rights?

What is the use of having black gay groups if the gay leadership is going to trample all over us and use their money to overstep us at every point?

Page: 1 | 2
Cannick was chosen by Essence magazine as one of 25 Women Shaping the World. She is a founding member of the National Black Justice Coalition, the nation’s black gay civil rights group, and is a member of the National Association of Black Journalists. Based in Los Angeles, she can be reached via her Web site at jasmynecannick.com.
Keywords:  Jasmyne Cannick 
Related stories from Advocate.com

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Tara Diab
    Date posted: 2008-09-28 11:01 PM
    Hometown: Arlington, MA

    Comment:

    After reading all of the stories written by you, Jasmine, I just have one question: How is it that you still have a job? You are the most condescending, bigoted racist that I have ever read. And i feel sorry for people who have to be in contact with you pn a regular basis


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.
  • Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
    When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.
  • Hungry Like the Wolf
    A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.
  • Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
    Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.
  • The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
    With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.
  • Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
    After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.
  • The Pride of Antwerp
    Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.
  • Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
    In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.
  • Top Political Blogs
    From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.
  • The Diva of French Television
    A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.