Lobbying group supports pro-gay Massachusetts candidates
September 08 2004 11:00 PM ET
A lobbying group that supports same-sex marriage has started making campaign contributions to Massachusetts candidates in tight races for state office in an effort to tip the legislative balance against a proposed amendment to the state constitution banning same-sex marriage. The Freedom to Marry Political Action Committee, formed earlier this year, has already raised nearly $15,000 and spent nearly $6,000, the bulk of it in $500 contributions to 10 legislative candidates, according to campaign finance
records released Tuesday. Tuesday was the filing deadline for candidates and political action committees ahead of next week's primary election. The goal is to help backers of gay marriage put their money where their mouths are by giving them another vehicle to support candidates sympathetic to their cause, group spokesman Josh Friedes said. "The gay and lesbian civil rights community is very serious about supporting candidates. They know it's not enough just to call their lawmakers," he said.
A group formed to support candidates who oppose gay marriage, the Heritage Alliance Political Action Committee, has not been able to raise a significant amount of money and has not made any contributions. Michael Carl, who formed the group, has decided that instead of raising money
he will concentrate his efforts on volunteering time for the campaigns of candidates who oppose gay marriage. "I've signed on with several campaigns," he said. "I'd rather go out and press the flesh and talk up the candidates I'm personally supporting, those who support mainstream values."
Friedes said the contributions are not necessarily timed for the primaries but are also designed to help candidates preparing for November's general election. "We're clearly putting our money into races that we think are important--races that are contested, typically where there is a significant challenger who
opposes gay rights," he said.
One of those races is a rematch of a special election earlier this year that pitted Democrat Angus McQuilken and Republican Scott Brown for the state senate seat held by McQuilken's former boss, Cheryl Jacques. Jacques resigned her seat to head the Human Rights Campaign, a national gay rights organization. Brown, who won a narrow victory, voted in favor of the proposed amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman but establishing civil unions for same-sex couples. McQuilken opposes the amendment, saying gay couples should have full marriage rights. Friedes's group made a $500 contribution to McQuilken, the maximum allowed under state campaign finance laws. The group also gave $500 to state senator Pam Resor, a Democrat from Acton, who supports gay marriage and opposed the proposed amendment. Resor is among a handful of Democratic incumbents that Republicans believe they have a chance of ousting in November.
A joint session of the Massachusetts house and senate voted 105-92 in favor of the proposed ballot question in March. The amendment must be approved a second time during the next legislative session, which begins in January. The soonest it could go before voters is 2006.
- Artist Spotlight: Carlos Barahona Possollo
- Op-ed: Male Gays and the Male Gaze
- A Best-Case, Worst-Case Look at the Supreme Court's Options
- Op-ed: 6 Lessons a Straight Couple Learned From Owning a Gay Bar
- Alabama Marriage Equality on Two-Week Hold
- WATCH: George Takei Parodies TLC's My Husband’s Not Gay