California assembly scales back gay-inclusive textbook bill

The California assembly on Monday gutted a bill that would have required state textbooks to include the historical contributions of gay people, amending it to say only that school material should not be discriminatory toward gays. Lawmakers voted 56–2 to delete the provision at the request of the bill's author, Sen.Sheila Kuehl, who had feared a gubernatorial veto.

Her bill instead would prohibit any negative portrayal of gay people in textbooks and other instructional material, expanding current antidiscrimination laws that apply to minorities. "I'm not really someone who wants to plop something down on his desk for him to veto," said Kuehl, a Democrat from Santa Monica. "I want a signature."

She said she was upset that Schwarzenegger had taken the unusual step of issuing an opinion about a bill before it reached his desk. Kuehl said Schwarzenegger chief of staff Susan Kennedy told her privately that the governor "has been getting a lot of heat about your bill when he goes to speak to conservatives. He just doesn't want to sign it."

Schwarzenegger spokeswoman Margita Thompson on Monday declined to comment on the amendments to the bill but reiterated concerns about the measure. "The governor will not sign a bill that micromanages curriculum that is better left with the state board of education," she said.

Asked for a response, Kuehl said antidiscrimination language is a question of fairness and equality. "Antidiscriminatory provisions in state law have never been seen as 'micromanaging' education decisions," she said.

Although many assembly Republicans voted for the amendments, they remain opposed to the underlying bill, which continues to elicit opposition from conservative groups. "We took a terrible bill and took some of the sting out of it," Bob Huff, a Republican from Diamond Bar, said in an interview after the vote. "It's still a bad bill."

Huff, a member of the assembly education committee, said additional antidiscriminatory language is not needed because any teacher promoting an antigay message would be sued.

Republican assemblyman Dennis Mountjoy said the proposed changes are "nothing more than putting perfume on a pig."

Randy Thomasson, president of the Campaign for Children and Families, called upon Schwarzenegger to keep his promise to veto the bill. "SB 1437 still requires all teachers, all textbooks, and all instructional materials to positively portray cross-dressing, sex-change operations, bisexuality, and homosexuality, including homosexual 'marriages,'" Thomasson said of the amended bill.

State law prohibits textbooks from portraying people negatively because of their race, sex, color, creed, handicap, national origin, or ancestry. Geoff Kors, executive director of Equality California, said gays and lesbians should be added to the list. "Youth in schools should be able to come to school and not feel disparaged," Kors said.

With the amendments passed Monday, the assembly next will vote on the full bill. If approved, it would be sent back to the senate, which approved the bill in its original form in May.

Assembly speaker Fabian Nunez, a Democrat from Los Angeles who presented Kuehl's amendments, said he expected a spirited floor debate on the bill. "We're removing provisions of the bill that have proactive mandates but keeping the bill intact where it relates to antidiscrimination," he said. "Antigay literature ought not to be presented to our children." (AP)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

Error:Server capacity reached.

Error:Server capacity reached.