All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
In Tallahassee, Florida, a federal judge has ruled that a transgender woman teacher no longer has to be referred to as “Mr.” or “teacher” in the classroom, citing First Amendment protections. Instead, she can use “Ms.” and female pronouns. This decision follows the passage of HB1069 in Florida, which mandated that teachers could not use pronouns that “do not correspond to his or her sex.” Judge Mark Walker enjoined the state from enforcing the law against her, stating, “The State of Florida has not justified this grave restraint, and so the United States Constitution does not tolerate it. Ours is a Union of individuals, celebrating ourselves and singing ourselves and being ourselves without apology.”
The plaintiff, Ms. Wood, a teacher at a Florida high school, has been known as “Ms. Wood” for four years. She regularly would write her name, title, and pronouns on the whiteboard and used these pronouns with students, faculty, and staff, as well as in her personal life. In evaluating Ms. Wood’s usage of her name, title, and pronouns, the judge determined that “The freedom to use the title ‘Ms.’ and to share her preferred pronouns at school is essential to her basic humanity.”
Ms. Wood’s ability to use her preferred title and pronouns was threatened following the passage of House Bill 1069. Enacted into law in 2023, House Bill 1069 prohibits all employees and contractors of public K-12 educational institutions from using their preferred personal titles or pronouns if those “do not correspond to their sex.” After the law's enactment, administrators informed Ms. Wood that she had to remove her pronouns and title from display and could not correct students who referred to her as “Mr.” or “him.”
The judge commenced his ruling with a scathing critique of the state, writing, “Once again, the State of Florida has a First Amendment problem. It has occurred so frequently of late, some might say you can set your clock by it… The question before this Court is whether the First Amendment allows the State to dictate, without limitation, how public-school teachers refer to themselves when communicating with students. The answer is a thunderous ‘no.’”
The judge ultimately determined that prohibiting Ms. Wood from using her pronouns or title constituted an unconstitutional violation of her freedom of speech, deeming it a form of viewpoint discrimination. In his decision, he refuted several arguments presented by the state, including the claim that Ms. Wood using “Ms.” could “impede her job duties.” He found this assertion to be unfounded, noting instead that as a teacher, Ms. Wood's students achieved test scores higher than the district average. Additionally, the state argued that Ms. Wood’s identity itself was at odds with the state’s teachings on gender and sexuality, and thus she could be barred. This argument, based on a novel legal theory, was found by the judge to be entirely unsupported by court precedent.
This case is not the only recent legal action addressing this topic. Two weeks prior, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that repeated and intentional misgendering could constitute a hostile work environment. Similarly, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals determined that teachers do not have the religious right to misgender transgender students. While the Florida case did not grant Ms. Wood an injunction on the basis of a hostile work environment, it does not preclude the possibility that it might recognize she experienced such an environment in addition to the First Amendment violation identified by the judge when the case is fully heard.
It is important to note that although defendants are barred from enforcing the law against Ms. Wood, the injunction is currently limited only to the teacher. However, should other teachers be threatened with retaliation under similar circumstances, it is likely they would also prevail. Similarly, this case will likely be cited in other attempts to bar transgender students and teachers from using their pronouns in school settings nationwide.
This article originally appeared on Erin in the Morning.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
Latest Stories
Lillian Bonsignore will be first out gay Fire Department of New York commissioner
The HIV response on a cliff-edge: advocacy must drive urgent action to end the epidemic
CECOT story pulled by Bari Weiss gets viewed anyway thanks to Canadian streaming service
Burkina Faso issues first sentence for 'homosexuality and related practices'
Transgender NSA employee files discrimination lawsuit against Trump administration
Billy Porter is set to make a 'full recovery' from sepsis
Soccer stars Rafaelle Souza and Halie Mace are engaged & the video is so adorable
What is 'hopecore' and how can it make life better for LGBTQ+ people?
Santa Speedo Run 2025: See 51 naughty pics of the festive fundraiser
Instructor who gave U of Oklahoma student a zero on anti-trans paper removed from teaching
All about the infamous CECOT prison — on which CBS's Bari Weiss pulled a story
Chest binder vendors respond to 'absurd' FDA warning letter: 'Clearly discrimination'
Gay NYC Council member Erik Bottcher drops U.S. House bid, will run for state Senate instead
Massachusetts removes rule requiring foster parents to support LGBTQ+ youth
Dave Chappelle defends Saudia Arabia set: Trans jokes 'went over very well'
Texas judge who refused to officiate same-sex weddings sues to overturn marriage equality
At 50, passing isn’t the goal. Living is
Trending stories
Recommended Stories for You





































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes