Scroll To Top
Voices

Decriminalizing same-sex relations is an imperative for universal human rights

VOICES Decrim same sex relationships global effort caribbean lgbtq pride
Mario De Moya F/Shutterstock

The historic decriminalization of same-sex conduct in Dominica joins a growing global trend, disproving the notion that such measures are "Western imposed" and affirming that the decriminalization of same-sex intimacy is a universal human rights imperative, writes Human Rights Watch's Cristian González Cabrera.

In April, Dominica became the latest country to decriminalize consensual same-sex conduct. A local court ruled that provisions banning "buggery" and "serious indecency," understood to criminalize gay sex, were unconstitutional. The ruling is historic for Dominica because it finally cast off a colonial legal relic that had been an obstacle to equality for sexual and gender minorities. But beyond this Eastern Caribbean nation, the ruling has significant implications.

The Dominica ruling adds to a growing body of jurisprudence from the "Global South" that challenges the notion that decriminalization of same-sex conduct is "foreign," "Western," or "against national values." This idea, sometimes used by authorities in the 64 countries that still make such relations a criminal offense, often ignores the demands of many local activists and stakeholders. It is also frequently used to scapegoat sexual and gender minorities. But today, such rhetoric flies in the face of well-reasoned, human rights-based decriminalization rulings arising from Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa, Asia, and Oceania that firmly establish that the decriminalization of same-sex conduct is a universal human rights imperative.

VOICES Decrim same sex relationships global effort sydney harbor australia rainbow lights lgbtq world prideDr_Flash/Shutterstock

Some of the very early cases of decriminalization were indeed from the "Global North." The European Court of Human Rights ordered the decriminalization of same-sex intimacy in cases arising from the United Kingdom (1981), Ireland (1988), and Cyprus (1993). The United Nations Human Rights Committee ordered the same for Australia (1994). Yet, the bulk of national-level jurisprudence decriminalizing same-sex conduct has come from countries outside of these regions.

In Latin America, the Constitutional Court of Ecuador's Case No. 111-97 TC (1997) was an early example of national jurisprudence ordering the decriminalization of same-sex conduct. There, the court found that "homosexuals are, above all, holders of all the rights of the human person and therefore have the right to exercise them in conditions of full equality." In recent years, five other Caribbean nations have decriminalized in landmark rulings: Belize (2016), Trinidad and Tobago (2018), Antigua and Barbuda (2022), Saint Kitts and Nevis (2022), and Barbados (2023).

The case of the National Coalition for Gay & Lesbian Equality & Others v. Ministry of Justice & Others (1998) in South Africa was the first to decriminalize same-sex relations on the African continent. A concurring opinion affirmed that the case occurs "in the context of evolving human rights concepts throughout the world" and "should be seen as part of a growing acceptance of difference in an increasingly open and pluralistic South Africa." Recent decisions in Botswana (2019) and Mauritius (2023) further solidified this trend.

Meanwhile, courts in Asia and Oceania, including Fiji (2005), Nepal (2007), Hong Kong (2007), and India (2018), have also affirmed that the criminalization of same-sex conduct violates fundamental human rights. In the Indian ruling after a protracted legal fight, justices held that the "role of the Courts gains more importance when the rights which are affected belong to a class of persons or a minority group who have been deprived of even their basic rights since time immemorial."

VOICES Decrim same sex relationships global effort Mumbai india lgbtq pridebodom/Shutterstock

The contributions made by courts in these varied parts of the world confirm the continued criminalization of gay sex is not a niche issue that is the domain of "the West." The rulings are context-specific and highlight how criminalization infringes upon the rights of sexual and gender minorities and their communities, including the rights to non-discrimination, life and security, family, housing, health, work, and education, and freedoms of expression and assembly. While rulings are multifaceted, these diverse courts have generally found that criminalization is draconian and erodes the rule of law for everyone.

There have been some legal setbacks, such as Uganda's Constitutional Court upholding the Anti-Homosexuality Act in April and the dismissal of a constitutional challenge to "buggery" and "gross indecency" laws in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in February. However, rulings upholding criminalization remain outliers, in part because of the strength and diversity of the decriminalization rulings. Findings such as that of the Uganda Constitutional Court, that legislators "know the sentiments of the people that they represent on the subject," now appear painfully biased and myopic.

While courts play a crucial role, governments should refrain from punting their legislative duties to the judiciary, especially since court cases can take years to litigate. Many governments around the world have passed legislation to decriminalize same-sex conduct, either explicitly to protect sexual minorities or indirectly by implementing broader criminal law reforms. This has led to real progress. However, the rulings in a wide variety of countries make clear that arguments about decriminalization being "Western imposed" are disingenuous and shield authorities from addressing substantive underlying human rights issues.

Instead of presenting straw-man arguments, authorities should stop using such rhetoric, heed the findings of courts around the world, and urgently recognize that the decriminalization of same-sex intimacy is essential for the equal advancement of human rights.

Cristian González Cabrera is a senior researcher with the LGBT rights program at Human Rights Watch.

Voices is dedicated to featuring a wide range of inspiring personal stories and impactful opinions from the LGBTQ+ and Allied community. Visit Advocate.com/submit to learn more about submission guidelines. We welcome your thoughts and feedback on any of our stories. Email us at voices@equalpride.com. Views expressed in Voices stories are those of the guest writers, columnists and editors, and do not directly represent the views of The Advocate or our parent company, equalpride.

Advocate Channel - The Pride StoreOut / Advocate Magazine - Fellow Travelers & Jamie Lee Curtis

From our Sponsors

Most Popular

Latest Stories

Cristian González Cabrera