|| News ||
1 2 3 NEXT  Page 1 of 3

View From Washington

DADT repeal may finally be dead after Senate majority leader Harry Reid set a floor calendar for this week that left no room for debate of the defense authorization bill.

CAPITOL1 X390 (GETTY) | ADVOCATE.COM

I have to level with you — “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal is most likely dead. Goodness knows, I hope to be wrong, but nothing short of a December-induced miracle on 34th Street could resurrect it now.

Of course, no one in Washington is going to come right out and say it because business here is done within a complicated strata of subterfuge that’s rarely decipherable to outsiders. But there hasn’t been so much as a single smoke signal suggesting that the White House or the Democratic leadership has the will to push repeal through.

The near-final nail in the coffin was delivered by Senate majority leader Harry Reid over the weekend when he announced the floor schedule for the week of December 6: nothing Monday, on Tuesday/Wednesday an impeachment trial of a federal judge from Louisiana, with the first votes of the week likely to come on Thursday.

Once the impeachment is a wrap, Reid noted that left “a pretty clear path” to what else needed to be addressed – tax cuts, a Continuing Resolution to keep the government funded, and the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty plus votes on some other extraneous bills, one of which included the DREAM Act.

Reid said the schedule should leave the Senate “ample time” to complete those priorities and that they hoped to adjourn on December 17.

"That's the plan, we hope we can execute it," he said with an air of finality from the Senate floor Saturday.

Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Sen. Carl Levin — perhaps slightly dismayed at no mention of the National Defense Authorization Act — prodded Reid to “say something about the Defense bill.”

Oh yeah ... that. “We’re also trying to figure out a time to move forward on the defense authorization bill,” Reid added, along with offering some minutiae about process and time being too scarce to debate the bill without putting limitations on the number of amendments and length of debate. (Gay.Americablog.com has the full video here if you're feeling super-wonky.)

But as I see it, what Reid said after being prompted by Levin is beside the point. The majority leader laid out the must-gets and they line up perfectly with what the White House has been pushing as its lead lame-duck items for the past couple months: extending the middle-class tax cuts and passing START. Press secretary Robert Gibbs has continually pounded these two points home in the White House briefings, rarely mentioning the defense authorization bill unless responding to a direct question about the policy. And a listing of White House talking points that was distributed to Congress members after last week’s bipartisan meeting made no mention of the National Defense Authorization Act. But guess what was mentioned? START and taxes.

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. 1 2 3 NEXT  Page 1 of 3
Reader Comments
  • Name: John
    Date posted: 12/17/2010 4:52:28 PM
    Hometown: Merced

    Comment:

    The buzz of committee hearings, conference debates, and a military study has involved so many people. All that effort by those individuals to justify the repeal of DADT has resulted on 12-17-10, Fri. afternoon, an announcement by Senator Reid that a vote will be taken on Sat. 12-18-10 afternoon. Failure to repeal DADT by the U.S. Senate will invite the Federal Courts to rule DADT unconstitutional. Such a decision then becomes a blackeye upon Congress and a blackeye upon the Pentagon in the law books of our society. Will the Senate heed Secretary of Defense Gates' warning to get this done before the courts attain jurisdiction over both the Congress and the Pentagon?

  • Name: J Marc
    Date posted: 12/7/2010 6:30:20 PM
    Hometown: Vancouver, BC

    Comment:

    @Bill - "The correct term is `undocumented worker'". Ah, that's the PC term for "illegal immigrants", thanks. "... remember accusing me of making a `Germanic slur?'" - No, reread my post, I said that it "sounded like" it might be a slur; I have no control over what you infer. " ... you didn't even understand that Tyler Helm's is an account executive at Deutsch ... " It's not that I didn't understand your reference; it is, rather, that when I read that particular article I didn't find his place of business a salient piece of information to be committed to memory. "I'm still waiting for my apology . . . [sic]" For what, your misreading of what I wrote?

  • Name: Dave
    Date posted: 12/7/2010 12:36:57 AM
    Hometown: Santa Ana, CA

    Comment:

    So the Executive Branch of our Government is useless, the Legislative Branch is useless. Let's hope the Judicial Branch can do something to save America from itself, if its not too late.

  • Name: Bill
    Date posted: 12/6/2010 10:42:30 PM
    Hometown: Arlington

    Comment:

    @J Marc - Actually, immigration reform is an important issue in the country and nothing to be mocked. The correct term is "undocumented worker." Also, remember accusing me of making a "Germanic slur?" As I stated, you didn't even understand that Tyler Helm's is an account executive at Deutsch, Inc., a full-service ad agency headquartered in New York City. I'm still waiting for my apology . . .

  • Name: BOB
    Date posted: 12/6/2010 9:42:57 PM
    Hometown: waynesboro ,va

    Comment:

    I actually despise this MF's their boneless backless wimpy aholes. All the money that has been wasted on this problem is sooooooo, I could scream. There shouldn't be an argument about this subject. IT'S DESCRIMINATION,WHEN IN THE HELL ARE GOING TO REALIZE THIS AND STOP SCREWING WITH THE PEOPLE THAT WANT TO SERVE IN THE MILITARY.

  • Name: Bryan
    Date posted: 12/6/2010 7:27:25 PM
    Hometown: Los ANgeles

    Comment:

    MSNBC talking heads are claiming that the billioniaire tax cut Obama just announced (capitulating to the Republicans) will somehow "free up" DADT repeal. Of course it wont. McCain will filibuster repeal anyway, and Obama will start next year with egg on his face. WHY didn't he put DADT on the table in this deal???

  • Name: abe
    Date posted: 12/6/2010 5:51:19 PM
    Hometown: new york city

    Comment:

    I'm Asking AND I'm Telling. http://huff.to/fzFMhc

  • Name: pepa
    Date posted: 12/6/2010 5:24:42 PM
    Hometown: gayrea51.blogspot.com

    Comment:

    "Bottom line, if "don't ask, don't tell" repeal dies on the vine, the White House earned this epic failure and they own it." -- Amen. Great piece Kerry. I usually disagree with you, but now your writing is now more relevant than ever. This was a good read and it helped explain a lot (without the usual partisan rhetoric) since of course you are in DC and at the frontlines. *Ahem* Now you phony-baloney liberals have a "lotta spelainin' tu doo." The only good that would come out of this is that if repeal fails (which in all instances it looks like it will) is that hopefully enough gay people will wake up and stop being defrauded by these pick-pocket liberals. If repeal fails Joe Solomonese HAS to resign and all of your liberal hacks will have no one else to blame BUT YOURSELVES for (as one commenter on here puts it) "farting for the last two years" and WAITING this long to do anything about it. You weasels have done enough damage and misery to our community. Enough is enough.

  • Name: J Marc
    Date posted: 12/6/2010 2:47:22 PM
    Hometown: Vancouver, BC

    Comment:

    You could, I suppose, claim to be illegal aliens (or, is the PC word just Illegals?) and demand to be soldiers, sailors and marines. You'd be inducted into the Armed Forces before you could get your heels off.

  • Name: J Marc
    Date posted: 12/6/2010 2:39:22 PM
    Hometown: Vancouver, BC

    Comment:

    So, your Fierce Advocate farted around for 2 years with DADT; the gov't spent a small fortune on that asinine study with results which just happened to be scheduled for the lame duck session; McCain races round spluttering and slobbering like Daffy Duck; Harry Reid and the White House announce that they were committed to taking a vote on DADT during the lame duck session (taking a vote, not ensuring its passage!); and, you're FA sics the DOJ on the court system. You're gov't certainly knows how to shit on you. As much as the FA, Senate and Brass wept and wailed about wanting to get rid of DADT themselves (only they know how to do it properly and only they knew how to introduce the changes over several years), it appears that the only hope now is the judicial system - FA and the DOJ be damned. They didn't want the courts to mandate the repeal of DADT; but, they sat there with their thumbs up their asses for too long - except for McCain who continued to make noises from his ass.



 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity