A National
Institutes of Health panel has voted to continue human
studies under way in Kenya and Uganda that aim to
determine if--and by how much--male
circumcision may reduce the risks of HIV infection, the
San Francisco Chronicle reports. Some AIDS
experts had worried the studies were unethical because they
believe previous research shows that circumcision is
highly effective in preventing HIV infection and that
the uncircumcised men in the current studies should be
offered the procedure. A similar study in South Africa
was halted early last year so that all participants could be
offered circumcision.
The South African
study showed that the risk of men acquiring HIV through
heterosexual intercourse was about 60% lower for men who
were circumcised than those who were not. Although the
studies included only heterosexual men, researchers
believe gay and bisexual men who are circumcised may
also be at a lower risk of HIV infection through insertive
anal intercourse. Experts say uncircumcised men are at
a greater risk of HIV infection because sexual fluids
that contain HIV can remain trapped under the foreskin
and placed in prolonged contact with cells in the foreskin
that are susceptible to infection.
The Ugandan and
Kenyan studies are slated to run at least one more year.
(The Advocate)