
CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
The state of Maryland will now allow a woman to be named as a parent on the birth certificate of a child born to her same-sex spouse without the court order previously required, Lambda Legal reports.
The Maryland Division of Health and Mental Hygiene sent a letter to state birth registrars last Thursday ordering them to make the change. The letter said the impetus for the change was an opinion issued by Atty. Gen. Douglas Gansler last year that the state would likely soon recognize same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions. The state legislature is also debating a bill that would allow gay couples to marry in Maryland.
The health division said that if a woman who gives birth to a child indicates she is married, birth registrars should enter information on her spouse, regardless of gender, into the state's Electronic Vital Records System in the space currently used for the father's information. Registrars can start following this procedure immediately but must do so by March 1, the letter noted.
Susan Sommer, Lambda's director of constitutional litigation, issued a statement calling the move an "important step for Maryland children," who "will start their lives with the added security of a birth certificate accurately describing their families." Lambda, which advocated for the change, recommended that for further protection, these families should also have the nonbiological parent formally adopt the child. Lambda is also backing the Maryland marriage equality bill; Sommer testified in support of it last week.
The letter said the birth certificate procedure will not change in the case of a surrogate giving birth to the child of a man married to another man. If she is unmarried and an affidavit of parentage is signed, information on the father who signed the affidavit is to be entered into the electronic system, and his same-sex spouse will need a court order to be listed on the birth certificate. If the surrogate is married, her spouse is to be listed as the father; if she refuses to provide her spouse's information, the space for the father's information can be filled in only by court order.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
'Jeopardy!' champ Amy Schneider schools Pete Hegseth on drag in the military
November 07 2025 7:44 PM
Florida attorney general calls for cancellation of 'demonic' Christmas drag show in Pensacola
November 07 2025 5:16 PM
How the government shutdown is affecting LGBTQ+ people — and what bad legislation is upcoming
November 07 2025 4:43 PM
10 LGBTQ+ leaders who've changed the face of global politics
November 07 2025 10:15 AM
Nancy Pelosi, retiring from Congress, leaves a record as a champion of LGBTQ+ equality
November 06 2025 4:28 PM
10 queer slang words that defined the internet in 2025
November 06 2025 4:07 PM
Raven-Symoné shares her opinion on former co-star Bill Cosby
November 06 2025 4:04 PM
Supreme Court allows Trump administration's anti-trans and anti-nonbinary passport policy (for now)
November 06 2025 3:46 PM
D.C. 'sandwich guy' not guilty of assaulting a federal agent, jury finds
November 06 2025 3:44 PM
Why trans storytelling in film is more important than ever
November 06 2025 1:31 PM
Wisconsin bill would allow lawsuits against doctors that provide gender-affirming care
November 06 2025 12:57 PM
Nancy Pelosi, fierce LGBTQ+ ally, announces retirement
November 06 2025 9:04 AM
Is marriage equality at risk? Understanding Kim Davis's Supreme Court appeal
November 06 2025 7:05 AM
































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes