The New American Classic

Rachel Maddow’s not only bringing thinking back to TV news, she’s assuring herself a spot on the Mount Rushmore of broadcasting, right next to Murrow, Cronkite, and Brokaw.

By Suzan Colón

From The Advocate December 2, 2008

It’s deceptively quiet at 9 o’clock on a weeknight in the MSNBC studio at New York City’s Rockefeller Center. Shoulder-to-shoulder workstations rest on a rat maze of tables, and a smiling jack-o’-lantern sits atop the first desk at the door -- an indication that this might not be a typically staid newsroom. At the far end of the floor is a small show set, where Rachel Maddow is typing at breakneck speed during a commercial break, keeping up with the constantly altering face of the U.S. political scene even as her live show is on the air.

“Change” has been the promise of this year’s historic election, but in this small studio a big change has already taken place. MSNBC took a risk in giving a prime-time news show to Maddow, the host of an eponymous radio show on Air America; how would an unapologetically far left–leaning lesbian do with her own news show? The answer came when, her second week on the air, Maddow beat the ratings suspenders right off the mighty Larry King, topping King both in total viewers and in the 25–54 demographic. And in less than two months, MSNBC’s ratings during her time slot spiked from an average viewership of 800,000 to 1.7 million.

“I am a proxy for everyone I know,” Maddow says to New York Times columnist Paul Krugman as she looks for some sign of hope about the country’s financial free fall during that night’s “Talk Me Down” segment. (Things being what they are, even Nobel laureate Krugman is unable to help.) Her offhand statement sums up a large part of Maddow’s sudden, intense appeal: To her viewers, she’s a peer. Other pundits are white men as angry as the angry white men they grill; most political analysts seem detached from what’s happening around them. Maddow clearly knows what she’s talking about, but she speaks plainly, with the familiar pop-culture dialect used in real-people discussions at the bar; she described the presidential debates as “non sequitur-y” and used the jack-o’-lantern to illustrate the economy’s collapse by comparing Lehman Bros. bigwigs to kids who gorge themselves sick on Halloween candy. When exposing the rhetoric and outright lies of politicians, she ditches courtroom-style accusations for barely contained mirth. She’s sarcastic, but not bitingly so, and everyone is in on the joke—even those from whom she’s gleefully demanding honesty. Whether by nature or keen observation, she’s broken from both the holier-than-thou and gloom-and-doom approaches to punditry and offers something different: truth, with a twist. She’s now the go-to gal for people too embarrassed to admit they were getting much of their news from Jon Stewart.

Even more exciting than having achieved this level of success as an out lesbian is the fact that her intelligence, wit, and fresh take on politics have overshadowed the fact that she’s an out lesbian.

“Finally! Me being on television and being out is not a cover story in the mainstream news,” Maddow says after the show wraps and she heads to her office. There, she performs a fascinating transformation. First she switches from one of her tasteful, understated on-camera suits back into her off-duty uniform of baggy jeans, sneakers, a T-shirt, and a track jacket. (Actually, she undressed in the ladies’ room, explaining, “I was in my office, and I looked out the window and saw some guy changing his shirt in his office. And I thought, Hey, if I can see you…”) Then she makes a beeline for the makeup room, where she takes out five-week-old contact lenses -- “I’ve been too busy to get new ones” -- and smears goo all over her eyes, creating huge blue-gray eye-shadow circles that look like cartoon shiners. After it all gets wiped off with a tissue, the horn-rimmed glasses go on and -- ta-da! -- Lois Lane has morphed into Clark Kent.

Since becoming a “10-year overnight sensation,” as Maddow describes herself, she’s had to mix business with dinner, talking to the press about her program every night after the show wraps. “The trick is to find someplace that has decent food at 11 o’clock, good drinks -- I’m a big fan of old-man bars -- and is quiet enough to talk,” she says. Toward that end, she’s become a somewhat incongruous regular at the Waldorf Astoria’s Bull and Bear steakhouse. “You go in first,” she says, “because you’re dressed nicely, and I look like your nerdy cousin.”

There, over a perfectly made old-fashioned, Maddow -- out, proud, and unafraid to go head-to-talking-head with far-right Republican Pat Buchanan -- shows the first sign of not being completely at home in the spotlight. “I feel lucky to have all this attention and all of these people wanting to talk to me about what I’m doing,” she says. “The only hesitation I have is that I’m not interested in media about media. I feel like I sometimes struggle to be interesting in talking about how I got here.”

Story continues on next page...

Page: 1 | 2 | 3

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Name: Damon Hawyer
Date posted: 2008-11-30 3:16 PM
Hometown: Atlanta

Comment:

Assessing the wreckage of W’s first term, as a gay man marooned in a red-state, I was frankly afraid for my viable citizenship. But when he was installed for a second term, I was distraught for a lifeline to sustain my civic moorings through what I consider the darkest period in our history. In 2004, WWAA in Atlanta began carrying Air America. I would lie in bed with my radio clutched in my hands tuned to the Rachel Maddow show – which aired live at 5:00 a.m. – two hours before I would get up – and thinking who is cheery, witty brainiac who comes to work at that time of day – and produces this impeccably-paced program? Accordingly, Rachel became that lifeline. Importantly, her debut was born at the nexus when the mainstream media jettisoned journalism on the altar of ratings. Under her mantra “truth has a liberal bias”, Rachael has informed and entertained me ever since. Her advancement to TV pundit status is more than inspiring. She is my heroine – or would she prefer hero?

Name: Ann
Date posted: 2008-11-22 7:27 PM
Hometown: Northampton, MA neighbor

Comment:

Rachel is awesome. I have such a crush, not just because of her good looks, her personality and intellect is really what lured me in. Thanks for the terrific article and great photos (in the print edition). I think the night David Frum ambushed her on her MSNBC show and the way she handled the situation was the best live tv interview moment I've witnessed. Classy Rachel, keeping her cool, being nice and polite while holding her ground in the face of ridiculous accusations. She makes me proud. To the trolls, get over it, you lost. MSNBC's left leaning hosts at least don't claim to be "Fair and Balanced". They are up front about where they stand and how they view a days events, unlike Faux who has suckered people for 8 years with a White House version of what people should hear. Talk about ignorant followers! Who's going to write Hannity's show after January 20?

Name: Ragfish
Date posted: 2008-11-17 12:40 PM
Hometown: Dallas

Comment:

Praise from a most unlikely fan As one whom Advocate would likely view as their worst nightmare i.e. a fundamentalist, evangelical Christian, who views MSNBC for the purpose of opposition research, I confess to enjoying listening to an intelligent articulate highly skilled newscaster, presenting more than soundbites with an edgy humor. While I differ on most points with the moral relativism, utopian pacifism and historical revisionism of the left, I enjoy Rachel's clarity in disecting current affairs. Advocate has performed a service in giving us a peek into the conflict common to all folk inclined toward erotic same sex attraction, however, Dr. Maddox is much more than her gay identity.

Name: Jo
Date posted: 2008-11-12 4:54 PM
Hometown: Tamarack, MN

Comment:

I have been a Maddow fan forever. I started listening to Maddow way back when. I have to thank MSNBC because my girlfriend will now actually listen to politics. She didn't care until I told her that Rachel Maddow was a lesbian. So, if nothing else, Maddow has educated those who normally wouldn't devote any time to politics and how can we not thank her for that. She has also put the GLBT community into the spotlight with her intelligence and wit. And, Tony from New York, you are simply a whiner. She certainly doesn't pretend to speak for everyone, but when she does speak for herself and upon the issues in which she believes, she is eloquent, dorky, witty and on point, all at the same time. Don't be jealous because there is an intelligent liberal political talk show host who is also a member of the LGBT community. If you are on the other side, eventually the conservatives, after reinventing themselves, will have someone like her, too. We just did it first. Neener.

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.