CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
An appeal of Arizona's gay marriage ban is being considered by the state supreme court on Tuesday, but it is still uncertain whether the court will decide to hear arguments in the case. The case involves Don Standhardt and Tod Keltner, who were denied a marriage license last July by a superior court clerk. The Arizona court of appeals has already ruled that court clerks acted properly in refusing a marriage license. In the Phoenix couple's appeal to the supreme court, they argue that the justices should hear the case because barring same-sex couples from civil marriage is in violation of state constitutional rights of privacy and equal treatment. Although the case is on the supreme court's agenda, it's no sure thing that the court will agree to rule on the issue. And if the court does accept jurisdiction, oral arguments in the case could be months away. Court watchers say they doubt the justices will take on the case because the lower court's decision was extremely detailed. In its ruling the court of appeals held that there is no fundamental constitutional right to same-sex marriage. It found that the state has a rational basis for prohibiting same-sex marriages because of goals related to procreation and child rearing. Arguing that the ban was based on legislative policies and not discrimination, the attorney general's office has urged the supreme court to allow the court of appeals ruling to stand. Others claim that different motivating factors are involved. "The legislature here is a huge threat to the court system, and they all know that," said Wally Straughn, an openly gay legislator who sits on the house judiciary committee. "I'm afraid that what they will do is just not hear [the case], as their safe way out."
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Sarah Paulson & Holland Taylor's cutest moments on the Walk of Fame
December 03 2025 3:25 PM
Here's what Zohran Mamdani has promised to do for LGBTQ+ New Yorkers as mayor
December 03 2025 2:20 PM
Upstate New York Methodist minister comes out as transgender to congregation during Sunday service
December 03 2025 9:24 AM
Transgender Army vet running for state delegate in red Maryland district is all about showing up
December 03 2025 7:00 AM
7 times Pete Hegseth was the definition of toxic masculinity
December 02 2025 5:46 PM
Man pleads guilty to murder of gay University of Mississippi student Jimmie 'Jay' Lee
December 02 2025 2:32 PM
Florida man partially paralyzed after neighbor allegedly shot him and used anti-LGBTQ+ slurs
December 02 2025 1:30 PM
Queer comedian Cameron Esposito has first baby with wife Katy Nishimoto
December 02 2025 12:49 PM
Trans National Guard employee in Illinois sues Trump over restroom ban
December 02 2025 11:59 AM
Oklahoma University instructor suspended for failing student’s unscientific anti-trans psychology essay
December 02 2025 11:03 AM
Trending stories
Recommended Stories for You




































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes